Digoxin Versus Ivabradine in Heart Failure With Preserved Systolic Function
NCT ID: NCT01796093
Last Updated: 2017-02-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
42 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2008-04-30
2012-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The authors have no conflict of interest and there was no financial sponsoring The study was planned according to the Good Clinical Quality standards using an intention-to-treat analysis. The protocol was approved from the ethics committee. Selected patients gave their written informed consent. The family practitioners agreed and obtained the collected data and analysis. Analysis of collected data was performed by a single-blinded author (without knowledge of the used test drug and time of collection of data).
Study Hypothesis: Compare the effect of digoxin and ivabradine in chronic heart failure with permanent atrial fibrillation (ischemic etiology).
Multiple Time Frames: Primary Outcome is measured before and after each medical intervention.
Measurements at baseline and after 3 month of therapy (twice, with the 2 different drugs):
Measurements Severity of dyspnea. Digoxin serum concentration. ECG: Heart rate at rest and during 6-min walking test. Cardiac function (echocardiography): systolic function (ejection rate, left trial size,diastolic function.
Participants were followed (ambulatory observation) for at least 3 months
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy Study of Digoxin & Ivabradine to Treat Heart Failure
NCT01699776
Digoxin Versus Ivabradine in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
NCT02046044
Efficacy of Ivabradine in Patient With Both Persistent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure With Reduce Ejection Fraction
NCT04308031
Intensive Versus Conventional Digoxin Use in Patients With Heart Failure
NCT02797145
Effect of Ivabradine and Beta-blockers Combination Versus Beta-blockers Up-titration on Right Ventricular Pacing
NCT01868880
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1 Inclusion criteria:
Dyspnea class III NYHA.
Abnormal left ventricular relaxation with preserved (≥52%) ejection fraction (LVEF).
Patients either in sinus rhythm or with permanent atrial fibrillation.
2\. Exclusion criteria:
Unstable angina pectoris.
Reduced systolic cardiac function (LVEF\<52%).
Normal diastolic function.
Diabetes requiring insulin.
Moderate or severe renal or hepatic dysfunction.
Technically insufficient echocardiography.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CROSSOVER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Digoxin cross-over ivabradine
Digoxin 0,125 mg once a day 5 days per week during 3 months. Ivabradine, 7,5 mg b.id. during 3 months.
Digoxin and ivabradine
No more details
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Digoxin and ivabradine
No more details
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
60 Years
78 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cardiology Office, Rheinfelden, Switzerland
OTHER
Cocco, Giuseppe, M.D.
INDIV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Cocco G., M.D.
M.D., FESC
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Giuseppe Cocco, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cardiologist, senior lecturer
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cardiology office
Rheinfelden, Canton of Aargau, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cocco G, Jerie P. Comparison of digoxin and ivabradine in heart failure with preserved systolic function. Submitted to the American Heart Journal.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Cocco G, M.D.
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
GC&PJ-Dig-Iva-2009-2012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.