Prescribe Exercise for Prevention of Falls and Fractures: A Family Health Team Approach

NCT ID: NCT01698463

Last Updated: 2019-02-18

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 11 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2012-01-31
• Study Completion Date: 2012-07-31

Brief Summary

Falls and fractures are a leading cause of death and disability in the older adult population. The consequences of falls and fractures contribute substantially to health care costs and can have a significant negative impact on the quality of life of the individual. Exercise has been studied as an option to reduce fracture risk and prevent falls though improving balance and muscle strength. The prevention of falls is important, as a history of falls is strongly predictive of suffering another. Those who are at a high risk of fracture or falling require a patient specific assessment and individualized exercise prescription that is tailored to their needs. This kind of program may not be typically available within the community and at a low cost. These individuals may experience difficulty when trying to engage in exercise due to barriers such as a lack of transportation, and a lack of knowledge. As the first point of contact with the health care system for many family doctors are in the ideal position to deliver exercise advice to their patients. However, a lack of time and specialized skills in prescribing exercise make this difficult for many of them. As a result, family health teams who provide interdisciplinary patient centered care are becoming popular. In this model the care is shared and provided by the most appropriate team member (e.g. doctor, nurse, exercise specialist). Additionally, many exercise interventions do not include a behavior change aspect, which may be an important component when trying to get individuals to engage in a new health behavior like exercise. Therefore the purpose of this project is to assess the feasibility of implementing a tailored exercise program to those at high risk of falls or fractures over the age of 65 in a primary care setting using an interdisciplinary model of care that is based on a health behaviour change model.

Detailed Description

Falls and fractures together represent one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality within the older adult population. Additionally, the consequences of falls and fractures contribute substantial costs to the health care system and negatively impact the quality of life of the individual. Given that Canada's aging population in increasing at an unprecedented rate, it is imperative that the prevention and management of falls and fractures is made a priority. One such population particularly vulnerable to falls and fractures are those diagnosed with osteoporosis or low bone mass.

It has been estimated that approximately 10 billion individuals have been diagnosed with osteoporosis and another 34 million are at risk with low bone mass. Osteoporosis-related fragility fractures are a common consequence of osteoporosis and result in increased morbidity and mortality. Approximately 50% of those who suffer a hip fracture do not regain their previous level of mobility and functional independence thus resulting in many of these individuals relying on the use of assistive devices.

Currently the emphasis of osteoporosis treatment and management is to prevent the occurrence of fragility fractures and the subsequent side effects that accompany them. A recent meta-analysis has shown that exercise can assist in the prevention and maintenance of bone loss in postmenopausal women. Other benefits of exercise such as increases in muscle strength and balance have been strongly established to indirectly prevent fractures through a reduction in falls risk. Those who are at a high risk of falls or fracture require patient specific assessment and individualized prescription that is not typically available within the community or at a low cost. Further, it may be difficult to engage these individuals if they have spent most of their life in a sedentary state and experience barriers such as a lack of transportation, and a lack of knowledge on appropriate types of exercise or how to initiate exercise into their daily living. Furthermore, many exercises may not be appropriate for all individuals depending on location of fracture and level of physical function. It has been emphasized that the focus should be on an individualized exercise program, which would encompass individual needs while recognizing individual limitations.

Family physicians may be in an ideal position to deliver an exercise prescription to a patient, as they are often the first point of contact with the health care system. However, there have been a number of problems cited with using family physicians to implement the delivery of an exercise prescription. Among those barriers, a lack of time and a lack of knowledge have been identified as the most problematic. An interdisciplinary family health team model of care is becoming increasingly important in regards to the treatment of chronic conditions such as osteoporosis. Family health teams provide an ideal form of care where team members work together to deliver the program and enhance adherence.

A limitation of many exercise interventions is that they fail to include a behavior change component which may be an important factor to consider when attempting to facilitate adherence to an exercise program. The Health Action Process Approach is a model of behavior change that has been widely used in a variety of health contexts including but not limited to physical activity. The rationale for the selection of this model is that it incorporates key principles of other behavior change models. Furthermore, the model has been cited as being a valid and reliable tool for predicting physical activity levels in older adults.

This project outlines an exercise intervention that is multidisciplinary in nature and tailored to the individual to be employed within an interdisciplinary family health team. Additionally, a behavior change component is built into this intervention with key principles such as action planning and coping planning that are based on the HAPA model to facilitate the uptake of physical activity in this vulnerable population.

Conditions

Fall and Fractures Prevention

Study Design

• Allocation Method: NA
• Intervention Model: SINGLE_GROUP
• Primary Study Purpose: PREVENTION
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

Identify Patients at Risk/Exercise Prescription

The intervention was delivered in two visits and two follow-up phone calls. Physician identifies that the patient is at risk of falls or fractures Visit one: individualized exercise prescription by a physiotherapist. Visit two: motivational interviewing (behavioural counselling) by kinesiologist Phone call 1 and 2: Kinesiologist reviews behavioural components (action planning, coping planning, coping self-efficacy, intentions.

Group Type: OTHER

Identification of patients at risk, tailored exercise prescription, motivational interviewing, review of behavioural outcomes

Intervention Type: OTHER

The intervention was delivered in two visits and two follow-up phone calls.

• Physician identifies that the patient is at risk of falls or fractures
• Visit one: individualized exercise prescription by a physiotherapist.
• Visit two: motivational interviewing (behavioural counselling) by kinesiologist
• Phone call 1 and 2: Kinesiologist reviews behavioural components (action planning, coping planning, coping self-efficacy, intentions.

Interventions

Identification of patients at risk, tailored exercise prescription, motivational interviewing, review of behavioural outcomes

The intervention was delivered in two visits and two follow-up phone calls.

• Physician identifies that the patient is at risk of falls or fractures
• Visit one: individualized exercise prescription by a physiotherapist.
• Visit two: motivational interviewing (behavioural counselling) by kinesiologist
• Phone call 1 and 2: Kinesiologist reviews behavioural components (action planning, coping planning, coping self-efficacy, intentions.

Intervention Type: OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• > age 65
• Patient of the Centre for Family Medicine Family Health Team (CFFM FHT)

Have at least one of the following:

• 2 or more falls in the past 12 months
• age 75 +
• high risk of fracture based on the CAROC
• difficulty with walking or balance as determined by attending physician
• acute fall
• history of a fragility fracture after the age of 50

Exclusion Criteria

• moderate to severe cognitive impairment
• moderate to severe neurologic impairment
• not able to communicate in English
• contraindications to exercise as determined by physician
• uncontrolled hypertension
• palliative care, current cancer, on dialysis
• participation in a similar exercise program including resistance training at least 3 times a week

• Minimum Eligible Age: 65 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

The Centre for Family Medicine, Ontario

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

University of Waterloo

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Lora M Giangregorio, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Waterloo

Locations

Centre for Family Medicine (CFFM)

Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

Countries

Canada

References

Boonen S, Dejaeger E, Vanderschueren D, Venken K, Bogaerts A, Verschueren S, Milisen K. Osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture occurrence and prevention in the elderly: a geriatric perspective. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Oct;22(5):765-85. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2008.07.002.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19028356 (View on PubMed)

Guideline for the prevention of falls in older persons. American Geriatrics Society, British Geriatrics Society, and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Panel on Falls Prevention. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 May;49(5):664-72. No abstract available.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 11380764 (View on PubMed)

Leslie WD, O'Donnell S, Jean S, Lagace C, Walsh P, Bancej C, Morin S, Hanley DA, Papaioannou A; Osteoporosis Surveillance Expert Working Group. Trends in hip fracture rates in Canada. JAMA. 2009 Aug 26;302(8):883-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1231.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19706862 (View on PubMed)

Brown AP. Reducing falls in elderly people: A review of exercise interventions. Physiother Theory Pract 1999;15:59-68.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Statistics Canada. Estimates of population, by age group and sex for July 1, Canada, provinces and territories, annual (CANSIM Table 051-0001). Ottawa: Statistics Canada 2010.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

World Health Organization. WHO Global Report on Falls Prevention in Older Age. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. 2007; Available at: http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/Falls_ prevention7March.pdf. Accessed Retrieved Aug, 2011.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med. 1993 Jun;94(6):646-50. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90218-e. No abstract available.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 8506892 (View on PubMed)

National Osteoporosis Foundation. America's bone health: the state of osteoporosis and low bone mass in our nation. Washington DC: National Osteoporosis Foundation. 2002.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Ioannidis G, Papaioannou A, Hopman WM, Akhtar-Danesh N, Anastassiades T, Pickard L, Kennedy CC, Prior JC, Olszynski WP, Davison KS, Goltzman D, Thabane L, Gafni A, Papadimitropoulos EA, Brown JP, Josse RG, Hanley DA, Adachi JD. Relation between fractures and mortality: results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. CMAJ. 2009 Sep 1;181(5):265-71. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081720. Epub 2009 Aug 4.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19654194 (View on PubMed)

Papaioannou A, Kennedy CC, Ioannidis G, Sawka A, Hopman WM, Pickard L, Brown JP, Josse RG, Kaiser S, Anastassiades T, Goltzman D, Papadimitropoulos M, Tenenhouse A, Prior JC, Olszynski WP, Adachi JD; CaMos Study Group. The impact of incident fractures on health-related quality of life: 5 years of data from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int. 2009 May;20(5):703-14. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0743-7. Epub 2008 Sep 19.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 18802659 (View on PubMed)

Wiktorowicz ME, Goeree R, Papaioannou A, Adachi JD, Papadimitropoulos E. Economic implications of hip fracture: health service use, institutional care and cost in Canada. Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(4):271-8. doi: 10.1007/s001980170116.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 11420776 (View on PubMed)

Papaioannou A, Morin S, Cheung AM, Atkinson S, Brown JP, Feldman S, Hanley DA, Hodsman A, Jamal SA, Kaiser SM, Kvern B, Siminoski K, Leslie WD; Scientific Advisory Council of Osteoporosis Canada. 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. CMAJ. 2010 Nov 23;182(17):1864-73. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.100771. Epub 2010 Oct 12. No abstract available.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 20940232 (View on PubMed)

Martyn-St James M, Carroll S. Meta-analysis of walking for preservation of bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Bone. 2008 Sep;43(3):521-31. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.05.012. Epub 2008 May 26.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 18602880 (View on PubMed)

Gillespie LD, Robertson MC, Gillespie WJ, Lamb SE, Gates S, Cumming RG, Rowe BH. Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD007146. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007146.pub2.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19370674 (View on PubMed)

Eakin EG, Glasgow RE, Riley KM. Review of primary care-based physical activity intervention studies: effectiveness and implications for practice and future research. J Fam Pract. 2000 Feb;49(2):158-68.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 10718694 (View on PubMed)

Health Council of Canada 2010. Family Physicians as Gatekeepers.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Abramson S, Stein J, Schaufele M, Frates E, Rogan S. Personal exercise habits and counseling practices of primary care physicians: a national survey. Clin J Sport Med. 2000 Jan;10(1):40-8. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200001000-00008.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 10695849 (View on PubMed)

Yarnall KS, Pollak KI, Ostbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):635-41. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.4.635.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 12660210 (View on PubMed)

Petrella RJ, Wight D. An office-based instrument for exercise counseling and prescription in primary care. The Step Test Exercise Prescription (STEP). Arch Fam Med. 2000 Apr;9(4):339-44. doi: 10.1001/archfami.9.4.339.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 10776362 (View on PubMed)

Nupponen R. What is counseling all about--basics in the counseling of health-related physical activity. Patient Educ Couns. 1998 Apr;33(1 Suppl):S61-7. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00010-x.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 10889747 (View on PubMed)

Ritchie CS, Stetson BA, Bass PF 3rd, Adams KJ. Talking to patients about aerobic exercise for disease prevention: an educational exercise for medical students. Nutr Clin Care. 2002 May-Jun;5(3):103-14. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-5408.2002.00041.x.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 12134565 (View on PubMed)

Walsh JM, Swangard DM, Davis T, McPhee SJ. Exercise counseling by primary care physicians in the era of managed care. Am J Prev Med. 1999 May;16(4):307-13. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00021-5.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 10493287 (View on PubMed)

Health Canada. Database on the Internet 2011; Available at: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hl-vs/physactiv/index-eng.php. Accessed June 8 2011.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Barling NR, Lehmann M. Young men's awareness, attitudes and practice of testicular self-examination: a Health Action Process Approach. Psychol Health Med 1999; 4(3):255-263.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Cao D, Xie G. From intention to health behavior: An overview on Health Action Process Approach. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology 2010; 18(6):809-812.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Chiu C. Testing schwarzer's health action process approach (HAPA) model of health promotion for people with multiple sclerosis: A path analytic approach. University of Wisconsin - Madison; 2009. 217 pp. Available from: UMI Order AAI3384139.:M1: Ph.D.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Luszczynska A, Goc G, Scholz U, Kowalska M, Knoll N. Enhancing intentions to attend cervical cancer screening with a stage-matched intervention. Br J Health Psychol. 2011 Feb;16(Pt 1):33-46. doi: 10.1348/135910710X499416.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21226782 (View on PubMed)

Schwarzer R, Luszczynska A. How to overcome health-compromising behaviors: The health action process approach. European Psychologist 2008; 13(2):141-151.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Williams RJ, Herzog TA, Simmons VN. Risk perception and motivation to quit smoking: a partial test of the Health Action Process Approach. Addict Behav. 2011 Jul;36(7):789-91. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 Mar 21.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21463920 (View on PubMed)

Schwarzer R. Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. Self-efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors: Theoretical approaches and a new model. Washington: Hemisphere; 1992. p. 217-243.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Luszczynska A, Schwarzer R. Planning and self-efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of breast self-examination: A longitudinal study on self-regulatory cognitions. Psychology and Health 2003; 18:93-108.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Renner B, Spivak Y, Kwon S, Schwarzer R. Does age make a difference? Predicting physical activity of South Koreans. Psychol Aging. 2007 Sep;22(3):482-93. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.3.482.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17874949 (View on PubMed)

Buman MP, Hekler EB, Haskell WL, Pruitt L, Conway TL, Cain KL, Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Frank LD, King AC. Objective light-intensity physical activity associations with rated health in older adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Nov 15;172(10):1155-65. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq249. Epub 2010 Sep 15.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 20843864 (View on PubMed)

Gerdhem P, Dencker M, Ringsberg K, Akesson K. Accelerometer-measured daily physical activity among octogenerians: results and associations to other indices of physical performance and bone density. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008 Jan;102(2):173-80. doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0571-z. Epub 2007 Sep 29.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17906874 (View on PubMed)

Matthews CE, Ainsworth BE, Thompson RW, Bassett DR Jr. Sources of variance in daily physical activity levels as measured by an accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Aug;34(8):1376-81. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200208000-00021.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 12165695 (View on PubMed)

Hughes DA. Feasibility, validity and reliability of the Welsh version of the EQ-5D health status questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 2007 Oct;16(8):1419-23. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9238-9. Epub 2007 Jul 25.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17653613 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

17664

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id