Preventing Falls in Older Adults With Cognitive Frailty

NCT ID: NCT06854731

Last Updated: 2025-08-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

328 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-15

Study Completion Date

2029-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Problem: The proposed trial will address the problem of how to effectively prevent subsequent falls in community-dwelling cognitively frail older adults with a history of falls.

Primary Question: In community-dwelling older adults with cognitive frailty and a history of falls, can a home-based exercise program with behavioural change techniques significantly reduce falls vs. health education (i.e., control; CON)?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale: Falls are a significant cause of functional decline and often a sentinel event. Older adults with cognitive frailty - those with concurrent physical frailty and mild cognitive impairment - are at particular risk for falls. Notably, falls can cause a sudden and severe change in their health state from one of independence to one of dependence. Thus, effective falls prevention strategies need to be identified for older adults with cognitive frailty.

The Otago Exercise Program (OEP) - a physical therapist (PT) delivered home-based exercise program - is an evidence-based falls prevention program for community-dwelling older adults. Our pilot data show the OEP vs. usually care significantly reduced subsequent falls in 192 community-dwelling older adults with cognitive frailty and a history of falls; the incident rate ratio was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.43-0.98; P = .042). These preliminary findings need to be confirmed in a rigorously designed RCT powered for falls in older adults with cognitive frailty; none exist to date.

We also observed lower OEP adherence among older adults with cognitive frailty vs. those without cognitive frailty. Thus, strategies to support adherence must be considered in RCTs of exercise to prevent falls in this high-risk population. Evidence-based strategies include health coaching.

Thus, we propose a 12-month multi-site randomized controlled trial (RCT) in older adults with cognitive frailty and a history of falls to assess the efficacy of the OEP combined with health coaching (i.e., OEP+) to prevent falls.

Primary Question: In community-dwelling older adults with cognitive frailty and a history of falls, can the OEP+ significantly reduce falls vs. health education (i.e., control; CON)?

Secondary Questions: 1) What are additional benefits of the OEP+ vs. CON? 2) Do the benefits of OEP+ persist 6 months post cessation? 3) Can the OEP+ reduce falls or improve quality of life at similar or lower costs vs. CON?

Methods: A 12-month assessor-blinded, multi-site RCT, with a 6-month follow-up, in older adults, with cognitive frailty - defined by a Short Physical Performance Battery score \< 9/12 and a Montreal Cognitive Assessment score between 18-25/30 - and a history of falls. Participants will be randomized to either: a) OEP+ or b) CON. The OEP+ intervention will include Brief Action Planning-based health coaching. The CON group will include monthly interactive education sessions via Zoom. Measurement will occur at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months, with falls tracked daily.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Falls Frailty Mild Cognitive Impairment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Educational Control

All active control participants will be invited to join monthly interactive education sessions via Zoom or in-person.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Education Session

Intervention Type OTHER

All active comparator participants will be invited to join monthly interactive social and education sessions via Zoom or in-person (hybrid delivery).

Otago Exercise Program (OEP) Plus

The OEP+ intervention integrates the OEP with health coaching by a physical therapists or kinesiologist. The OEP is an individualized home-based balance and strength exercise training program delivered by a PT or kinesiologist coach over 5 home visits

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Balance and Strength Training Exercises with Health Coaching

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The OEP+ intervention integrates the OEP with health coaching by a physical therapists or kinesiologist. The OEP is an individualized home-based balance and strength exercise training program delivered by a PT or kinesiologist coach over 5 home visits.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Balance and Strength Training Exercises with Health Coaching

The OEP+ intervention integrates the OEP with health coaching by a physical therapists or kinesiologist. The OEP is an individualized home-based balance and strength exercise training program delivered by a PT or kinesiologist coach over 5 home visits.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Education Session

All active comparator participants will be invited to join monthly interactive social and education sessions via Zoom or in-person (hybrid delivery).

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Otago Exercise Program Plus (OEP+)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* We will include individuals who: 1) are aged 70 to 89 years\*; 2) live in Greater Vancouver; 3) are community-dwelling (i.e., not residing in a nursing home or extended care unit); 4) experienced a non-syncopal fall in the prior 12 months; 5) scored \< 9/12 on the SPPB; 6) have subjective cognitive complaints based on interview; 7) scored 18-25/30 on the MoCA; 8) are able to walk independently; use of cane is acceptable; 9) are able to safely engage in exercise as indicated by the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire Plus (PAR-Q+) and confirmed by their physician; 10) have internet at home; and 11) are able to provide written informed consent.

* The age maximum of 89 was set due to the increased risk of significant adverse health outcomes cognitively frail older adults face. As this population has an increased risk of falls, functional disability with loss of independence, hospitalization, and death, setting an age maximum aims to increase the likelihood that participants will be able to complete the 18-month study without interruptions due to health complications. This age limit has been reviewed and approved by CIHR.

Exclusion Criteria

* We will exclude those who are: 1) diagnosed with dementia, as measured by a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score above 0.5, a neurodegenerative disease, or stroke; 2) self-report engaging in strength training and/or balance training exercises \> 2 times per week, in the prior 3 months; or 3) unable to understand, speak, and read English proficiently.
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

89 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of British Columbia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Teresa Liu-Ambrose

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Teresa Liu-Ambrose, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of British Columbia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre for Aging SMART at VCH, University of BC

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Teresa Liu-Ambrose, PhD

Role: CONTACT

6046178047

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H23-01584

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.