Improving Recovery After Stroke Via Electrical Stimulation of Proprioceptors
NCT ID: NCT01689883
Last Updated: 2017-04-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
1 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-08-31
2013-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Marker for Stroke Recovery
NCT05256368
Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With Physical Therapy in Post-Stroke Upper-Limb Motor Hemiparesis
NCT07153536
Effect of Neuro20 Functional Electrical Stimulation Suit on Autonomic Function, Muscle Performance, and Gait
NCT07164846
Passive Tactile Stimulation for Stroke Rehabilitation
NCT03814889
Robotic Interventions for Spasticity Treatment
NCT05006248
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To assess if delivering small currents to the arm has an effect on the accuracy of the movements performed by the study participants, they will receive actual stimulation for some trials and sham stimulation for other trials. Because the investigators will deliver very small currents, study participants will be unable to perceive such currents and hence tell if they are performing the movements while receiving actual or sham stimulation. By comparing trials performed while subjects receive actual stimulation with trials performed while subjects received sham stimulation, the investigators will determine if the stimulation has an effect on the accuracy of the movements performed by the subjects.
It is worth noticing that the investigators collected primary outcome data to assess changes associated with the use of actual stimulation vs sham stimulation. Data during a follow-up session was also collected, but not for the purpose of collecting outcome measures.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Current stimulator
The investigators have developed a device to deliver very small currents to the arm. The device will be used while subjects perform upper-limb movements using a device for upper-limb rehabilitation. Subjects will perform multiple trials of movement. During half of the trials, they will receive actual stimulation. During the other half, they will receive sham stimulation.
Current stimulator
This is a device developed by the investigators to produce sub-sensory electrical stimulation delivered via subcutaneous electrodes placed on the skin.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Current stimulator
This is a device developed by the investigators to produce sub-sensory electrical stimulation delivered via subcutaneous electrodes placed on the skin.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 6 months post-stroke
* Upper extremity impairments but able to move upper extremity against gravity 25% of the range
* Ability to understand directions and follow simple instructions
* Medically stable
* Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer between 28 and 55
* At least four (4) months since last botox treatment
* Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 23
Exclusion Criteria
* Upper extremity or trunk fractures
* Severe fixed contractures affecting the upper limbs
* Severe perceptual deficits or visual field impairments
* Severe cognitive deficits
* Pregnant women
* Presence of an implanted electrically operated medical device
* Evidence of more than one clinical stroke
* Serious medical or neurological illness
* History of head trauma or cerebral infectious disease
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Wyss Institute at Harvard University
OTHER
Center for Integration of Medicine & Innovative Technology
OTHER
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yong-Tae Lee
Physiatrist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Paolo Bonato, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Boston
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011-P-001592
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.