Traditional Balance vs Vibrotactile Feedback Training for Vestibular Rehabilitation

NCT ID: NCT01672658

Last Updated: 2016-04-04

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

31 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical research study at RIC is to determine the value and benefit of the SK multimodal balance training system through independent clinical evaluations. The functional benefit of the SK Balance system will be measured by any improvements in balance and functional assessments.

This study is primarily funded through Engineering Acoustics as a subcontract for a phase II Small Business Innovation Research by the Department of Defense.

3\) Hypotheses \& Research Objectives and Purpose:

The specific research questions to be addressed are:

1. How does an 8-week SKBS+VRT training intervention compare to an 8-week standard VRT intervention on balance and functional gait measures in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) participants.
2. How do SKBS measurement tools compare to standard clinical assessments of gait and balance in mTBI patients The purpose of this clinical research study is to compare the value and benefit of the SK multimodal balance training system in combination with traditional vestibular rehabilitation vs. traditional vestibular rehabilitation alone through independent clinical evaluations. The functional benefit of the SK Balance system will be measured by any improvements in clinical measures of balance, functional mobility, and gait assessment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) occurs when physical trauma causes temporary or permanent neurological damage. In some cases, symptoms can continue over time and contribute to disability. Dizziness and vertigo are associated with nearly all reported studies of mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) and are a significant and functionally limiting component of the overall disability.

TBI is one of the many risks faced by military personnel in combat activities . In a RAND Corporation survey of service members who had been deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan, 19% reported probable TBI. Dizziness and vertigo are associated with nearly all reported studies of mTBI and are a significant and debilitating component of the overall disability. mTBI are currently caused by both blast and impact injuries resulting in variable disabilities . Overt symptoms may include balance and spatial disorientation problems (vertigo) related to vestibular dysfunction, vision disturbances, inner-ear edema, and/or other sensory integration deficits.

Treatment of this particular population group has several challenges which include: 1) difficulty with early and specific injury assessment 2) the determination of appropriate return-to-duty measures 3) selection of effective individualized balance rehabilitation and treatment tools 4) Prolonged length of rehabilitation and uncertain measureable endpoints. The group is also highly variable in the nature and extent of balance deficits and cognitive and / or related psychological impairments. It appears that almost all subjects with mTBI show some susceptibility to vestibular or vestibular/ocular disorders.

After assessment of disequilibrium, rehabilitation is often a course of remedial physical therapy (PT). To affect change in mobility by standard physical therapy, sensory and motor systems are "habituated" through exercise, with hope of rehabilitating the system and "compensating" by instructing the patient to alter skill sets associated with a task. Compensation (without immediate sensory feedback) is problematic and prone to patient (and caregiver) interpretation and error, because it may not address the underlying problems and may not have long term therapeutic benefits. There is also a very limited pool of PTs who specialize in the treatment of neurological problems resulting from brain injuries. Individual vestibular rehabilitation treatment programs are designed by these specialist PTs who also monitor and participate in each patient's recovery. This approach is labor intensive, time consuming (up to 14 weeks of therapy is often needed) and some patients do not recover fully .

The overall objective of this research effort is to use novel combinations of multi-modal sensory guided feedback (especially tactile) and traditional vestibular rehabilitation to retrain military personnel suffering balance disorders as a result of mTBI. The investigators therapeutic goal is to test technology that will return the patient, in the shortest period of time, to a level of balance performance consistent with return to the community and/or military duty.

The sense of touch is intrinsically linked with the neuro-motor channel, both at the reflex and higher cognitive regions, which makes it uniquely tied to orientation and localization. Vibrotactile arrays are therefore intuitive and are an effective sensory feedback pathway.

Recent research has also demonstrated that tactile cueing yield significantly faster and more accurate performance than comparable spatial auditory cues. Further research has demonstrated this finding is relatively stable across a variety of body orientations, even when spatial translation is required and under physiological stress.

Over a Phase I SBIR and current Phase II effort, Engineering Acoustics Inc. has developed the Sensory Kinetics (SK) Balance System. In the SK system, patients move on a force platform (see Figure 1) while movement and posture data is interpreted by advanced software a mapped to a wearable vibrotactile belt array and visual display. Vibrotactile cueing provides continuous and instantaneous feedback to the patient that compliments their postural and mobility decisions. The investigators believe that vibrotactile feedback can greatly increase spatial awareness and consequently mobility. Further, the ability of the brain to re-organize and relearn functional movement activities provides an intriguing potential pathway for the retention of learned functional mobility strategies.Vibrotactile cueing involves short duration bursts of mechanical vibration from actuators, or tactors, that are mounted within a torso worn belt. The person's position is measured and calculated using a force plate sensor and camera sensors. The computerized system is then used as part of physical therapy balance training to improve the patient's balance and potentially reduce their risk of falling.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Traumatic Brain Injury Vestibular Deficits

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sensory Kinectics Balance System

Subjects will be randomized in to one of two groups. The group that will receive training on the SKBS device along with traditional vestibular and balance training.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sensory Kinetics Balance System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Subjects will participate in balance/gait/functional mobility training twice a week for 8 weeks.

Traditional Vestibular Rehabilitation

Traditional vestibular rehabilitation will include VOT exercises that will work toward increasing the gain of the system as well as walking, balance re-training, and functional mobility.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Traditional Vestibular Rehabilitation

Intervention Type OTHER

Subjects will perform traditional vestibular/balance rehabilitation which will include gait training, balance retraining, vestibular retraining, and functional mobility.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sensory Kinetics Balance System

Subjects will participate in balance/gait/functional mobility training twice a week for 8 weeks.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Traditional Vestibular Rehabilitation

Subjects will perform traditional vestibular/balance rehabilitation which will include gait training, balance retraining, vestibular retraining, and functional mobility.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Mild to moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
* Adults 18 years-75 years old
* Vestibular \&/or balance deficit following mild/moderate TBI and confirmed by healthcare professional
* Subjects reporting head injury from exposure to a blast/concussion injury with one or more of the following symptoms: dizziness, vertigo, headache, migraine, oscillopsia, movement induced vertigo.
* Able to sit unaided for two minutes
* Able to stand independently with or without a cane, or with no more than moderate assistance from the physical therapist/researcher.

Exclusion Criteria

* Multiple trauma
* Severe brain injury as defined above
* Pacemakers
* Weight greater than 250 lbs
* Mini Mental Status Exam score of less than 24 and/or Cognitive Log score of less than 25
* A diagnosis of:
* Peripheral neuropathy
* Severe neuromuscular diseases
* Severe Cardiovascular disease
* Associated high-level stroke or spinal cord injury
* Amputees
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

United States Department of Defense

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Arun Jayaraman

Research Scientist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Arun Jayaraman, PT, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NUSTU58913

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Real-time Neuromuscular Control of Exoskeletons
NCT04661891 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA