Efficacy and Safety of Synera in Osteoarthritis Pain

NCT ID: NCT01654302

Last Updated: 2015-05-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-09-30

Study Completion Date

2015-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) can result in significant pain and limitation of function. A number of topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been shown to reduce pain in this condition. This study examines a different topical approach, utilizing a topical anesthetic agent, to evaluate if application of such an agent would provide relief of exercise-induced knee pain in people with knee OA.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Subjects participated in two visits each at least 1 week apart, where they underwent two exercise interventions - a baseline exercise without treatment and a experimental exercise with intervention (Synera patch or Inactive patch). Participants rated their pain on a NRS-11 1 minute, 5 minutes, and 60 minutes after both exercises, as well as 6 hours after the experimental exercise, before bedtime, and the following morning. Subjects were randomized to receive either Synera at the first visit and the inactive patch at the second visit or the inactive patch at the first visit and Synera patch at the second visit.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Synera

lidocaine/tetracaine patch with heating component which consists of iron powder, activated carbon, sodium chloride, wood flour, water and filter paper.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Synera

Intervention Type DRUG

70 mg lidocaine/ 70 mg tetracaine topical patch applied once for 12 hours

Inactive Patch

placebo patch identical in appearance and composition (namely, the heating components) to the active patch other than lacking the lidocaine and tetracaine active ingredients.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Inactive patch

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo patch applied once for 12 hours

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Synera

70 mg lidocaine/ 70 mg tetracaine topical patch applied once for 12 hours

Intervention Type DRUG

Inactive patch

placebo patch applied once for 12 hours

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

lidocaine/tetracaine placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Men and women, age 40 years and above
2. Meet American College of Rheumatology criteria for knee OA
3. Knee pain most days of the week for the past month
4. Knee pain \> 5/10 after exercise intervention
5. Capable of undertaking exercise intervention
6. Stable cardiovascular function
7. Able to return for all clinic visits
8. Able to read and understand the informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria

1. Use of a walker to ambulate or inability to ambulate
2. Other forms of arthritis
3. Other major causes of pain that could be expected to interfere with assessment of pain during this trial, e.g., recurrent migraine, back pain, fibromyalgia
4. History of myocardial infarction
5. Blood Pressure \> 140 systolic/100 diastolic
6. Scheduled for and likely to need joint replacement surgery in the next 3 months
7. Any medical condition that in the judgment of the investigator would make the participant not suitable for the study
8. Sensitivity to lidocaine, topical or injectable analgesics/anesthetics.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nuvo Research Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Thomas J. Schnitzer

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Thomas J. Schnitzer

Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thomas J Schnitzer, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Northwestern University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STU00061115

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.