Comparative Effectiveness of Two Approaches to Diabetes Management in the Uninsured

NCT ID: NCT01653951

Last Updated: 2015-07-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

64 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-08-31

Study Completion Date

2015-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The results of the pre-pilot and pilot studies will be used to determine the feasibility of a fully powered trial that will test the effectiveness of two different approaches to diabetes management in an uninsured diabetic population who receives their care from a community based free clinic, namely nurse-directed interdisciplinary care management compared to peer-led self management. Effective programs for the uninsured diabetic will benefit both the individual and society by preventing serious illness, decreasing mortality and disability, decreasing medical debt, stimulating economic growth, improving business productivity, reducing job lock, decreasing health disparities, improving quality of life, and reducing cost shifting by decreasing uncompensated care. Findings will be generalizable to uninsured and insured patients across a wide spectrum of chronic conditions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The randomized pre-pilot and pilot studies will inform the design of a fully powered trial that will test the effectiveness of a nurse-led interdisciplinary care management intervention (CM) for improving hemoglobin A1c in uninsured diabetic patients who receive their primary medical care from a community-based free clinic compared to similar patients who undergo peer-led self management (SM). The comparative effectiveness of these approaches has not been tested in a randomized trial.

To ensure the success of the pilot study the investigators will perform a 6 month pre-pilot study using 10 patients per group. This pre-pilot will be used to establish protocols covering enrollment, HIPAA, consent, interventions and outcome measurement. The subsequent 1 year pilot will be used to demonstrate feasibility, estimate recruitment, attendance and follow up, refine inclusion criteria, provide power analysis, optimize the interventions and determine appropriate secondary outcomes for a fully powered trial. For the pilot, thirty patients will be randomized to the CM intervention for the first 6 months. Major components of the nurse-led CM model include: 1) assessment and goal setting for self-management; 2) education for self efficacy and productive clinical encounters; 3) access to specialist care via an interdisciplinary team; 4) evidence-based treatment recommendations responsive to patients' goals; and 5) care coordination by a nurse care manager. From 6-12 months patients will return to usual clinic care.

The 30 patients randomized to the SM group will be invited to attend weekly peer-led SM training broadly based on the Stanford University Diabetes Self-management Program's Train the Trainer Model. The training will occur over 6 weeks and will cover topics common to most chronic disease SM programs including: goal setting, self-management of chronic conditions, making action plans, feedback and problem solving, handling emotions, symptom management techniques, communication with health care providers, medications and making treatment decisions. The peer advisors and a nurse will then lead 1 hour monthly group sessions for the remainder of the first 6 months for review/revision of action plans, review of self management techniques and ongoing social persuasion and modeling. From 6-12 months patients will return to usual clinic care.

For the pilot, outcome measures will be obtained at 6 and 12 months. For this pilot, the investigators will not test any hypotheses. Instead, effect sizes and confidence intervals will be calculated for each outcome. These results will be used for power analysis. The results will also allow us to see which interventions are most effective on which outcomes and allow us to optimize the interventions to have the greatest impact on the primary outcome, hemoglobin A1c. Cost effectiveness will be determined in a fully powered trial.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Nurse-led care management

Nurse-led care management involves a nurse care manager who performs a comprehensive assessment of the patient then presents those assessment findings to an interdisciplinary team. The team makes care recommendations that are implemented by the care manager in collaboration with the patient's PCP.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

nurse-led care management or peer-led self management

Intervention Type OTHER

peer-led self managment

Peer-led self management follows the chronic disease self management model where peer counselors lead self management classes for 6 weeks, then conduct monthly support groups

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

nurse-led care management or peer-led self management

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

nurse-led care management or peer-led self management

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients will be eligible if they are between the ages of 25 and 75,
* have a diagnosis of diabetes (type II) with a hemoglobin A1c \>\[7.0\] There will be no exclusions based on gender, race or ethnicity.

Exclusion Criteria

* have no other illness that would dominate their care (e.g., terminal cancer, numerous exacerbations of CHF), and
* are not pregnant.
* patients must have no cognitive impairment.
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ohio State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Summa Health System

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Edward Scott

Physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Edward D Scott, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Summa Health System

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R03DK090351-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

shs250014

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

From Clinic to Community Study
NCT02804620 COMPLETED NA