Open-Label Lesinurad Monotherapy Extension Study in Gout

NCT ID: NCT01650246

Last Updated: 2016-05-26

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

143 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-08-31

Study Completion Date

2014-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will assess the serum uric acid lowering effects and safety of lesinurad over a long-term timeframe.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a Phase 3, open-label, uncontrolled, extension study to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of lesinurad monotherapy in subjects who completed the double-blind treatment period in Study RDEA594-303.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gout

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

lesinurad 400 mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

lesinurad

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, 400 mg QD

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

lesinurad

Tablets, 400 mg QD

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject is able to understand the study procedures and the risks involved and is willing to provide written informed consent before the first study related activity.
* Subject completed the double-blind treatment period in Study RDEA594-303 and was actively receiving and tolerating study medication (lesinurad or placebo) at Month 6 visit.
* Subject is willing to adhere to the visit/protocol schedules.
* Subject is male or female; female subjects of childbearing potential must agree to use an effective non-hormonal method of birth control during the study and for at least 14 days after the last dose of study medication.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject has any other medical or psychological condition, which in the opinion of the Investigator and/or the Medical Monitor, might create undue risk to the subject or interfere with the subject's ability to comply with the protocol requirements or to complete the study.
* Subject has a past medical history of urolithiasis, nephrolithiasis, or kidney stone diathesis.
* Subject developed kidney stones during Study RDEA594-303
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ardea Biosciences, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Chris Storgard, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ardea Biosciences, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Glendale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Peoria, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tempe, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Carmichael, California, United States

Site Status

Covina, California, United States

Site Status

Huntington Park, California, United States

Site Status

Irvine, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Englewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Trumbill, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Plant City, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winter Haven, Florida, United States

Site Status

Newnan, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Meridian, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Elizabethtown, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Traverse City, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Olive Branch, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

New Windsor, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Perrysburg, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Landsdale, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Sellersville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Brentwood, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Spring Hill, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Bountiful, Utah, United States

Site Status

West Layton, Utah, United States

Site Status

Chesapeake, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Suffold, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Herston, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Site Status

Genk, , Belgium

Site Status

Gozée, , Belgium

Site Status

Kortrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Yvoir, , Belgium

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Rimouski, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand

Site Status

Tauranga, , New Zealand

Site Status

Silverglen, Durban, South Africa

Site Status

Muckleneuk, Pretoria, South Africa

Site Status

Rondebosch, , South Africa

Site Status

Stellenbosch, , South Africa

Site Status

Thabazimbi, , South Africa

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Belgium Canada Germany New Zealand South Africa

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RDEA594-305

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Gout Dose Response Study
NCT00955981 COMPLETED PHASE2