Lesinurad Monotherapy in Gout Subjects Intolerant to Xanthine Oxidase Inhibitors

NCT ID: NCT01508702

Last Updated: 2016-02-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

214 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-31

Study Completion Date

2013-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will assess the serum uric acid lowering effects and safety of lesinurad compared to placebo in patients who are intolerant or have a contraindication to allopurinol or febuxostat.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Allopurinol is the standard of care for the treatment of gout. In practice, approximately 20% of patients report side effects with allopurinol and 5% discontinue allopurinol due to side effects. Allopurinol can cause gastrointestinal intolerance, such as nausea and diarrhea, which appears to be dosedependent. Rash develops in about 2% of patients treated with allopurinol, and in about 20% of patients treated with allopurinol and ampicillin or amoxicillin. Allopurinol hypersensitivity syndrome remains a major concern among physicians. Mortality has been estimated to be up to nearly one quarter of AHS cases, with multiorgan system disease including hepatocellular changes and renal failure being a serious concern. Allopurinol is also relatively contraindicated for use in combination with 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine, for which 1/4 to 1/3 lower doses must be given in order to avoid hematologic toxicity. Febuxostat, in clinical trials, has shown a similar AE profile to allopurinol. Liver function abnormalities, nausea, arthralgia and rash were the most commonly reported AEs. In postmarketing experience, Stevens Johnson Syndrome and hypersensitivity rashes have been reported (febuxostat prescribing information). Withdrawals due to AEs were similar in frequency to allopurinol as well. Relative contraindications in combination with 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine are similar to allopurinol as well. Lesinurad may be an important therapeutic option for patients who either cannot tolerate or who have a contraindication to the use of allopurinol or febuxostat.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gout

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

lesinurad 400 mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

lesinurad

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, 400 mg QD

placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets, Placebo QD

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

lesinurad

Tablets, 400 mg QD

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Tablets, Placebo QD

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject is able to understand the study procedures, the risks involved and willing to provide written informed consent before the first study related activity.
* Subject meets the diagnosis of gout as per the American Rheumatism Association Criteria for the Classification of Acute Arthritis of Primary Gout.
* Subject has an sUA level ≥ 6.5 mg/dL at the Screening and Day -7 Visits.
* Subject must be able to take gout flare prophylaxis with colchicine or NSAID (including Cox-2 selective NSAID) ± PPI.
* Subject has a history (either by medical record or subject interview) of intolerance or a contraindication to either allopurinol or febuxostat.
* Body mass index (BMI) \< 45 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject who is taking any other approved urate-lowering medication that is indicated for the treatment of gout at the Screening Visit.
* Subject with a documented history or suspicion of kidney stones.
* Subject who is pregnant or breastfeeding.
* Subject who consumes more than 14 drinks of alcohol per week (eg, 1 drink = 5 oz \[150 mL\] of wine, 12 oz \[360 mL\] of beer, or 1.5 oz \[45 mL\] of hard liquor).
* Subject with a history or suspicion of drug abuse within the past 5 years.
* Subject that requires or may require systemic immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment.
* Subject with a known or suspected human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
* Subject with a positive test for active hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection.
* Subject with a history of malignancy within the previous 5 years with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancer that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence, treated cervical dysplasia or treated in situ Grade 1 cervical cancer.
* Subject within the last 12 months with: unstable angina, New York Heart Association class III or IV heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, or deep venous thrombosis; or subjects currently receiving anticoagulants.
* Subject with uncontrolled hypertension.
* Subject with an estimated creatinine clearance \< 30 mL/min.
* Subject with active peptic ulcer disease requiring treatment.
* Subject with active liver disease, or hepatic dysfunction.
* Subject receiving chronic treatment with more than 325 mg salicylates per day.
* Subject taking valpromide, progabide, or valproic acid.
* Subject who has received an investigational therapy within 8 weeks or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to the Screening Visit.
* Subject with any other medical or psychological condition, which in the opinion of the Investigator and/or Medical Monitor, might create undue risk to the subject or interfere with the subject's ability to comply with the protocol requirements, or to complete the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ardea Biosciences, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Chris Storgard, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ardea Biosciences, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Glendale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Carmichael, California, United States

Site Status

Covina, California, United States

Site Status

Huntington Park, California, United States

Site Status

Irvine, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Englewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Milford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Trumbull, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Plant City, Florida, United States

Site Status

Port Orange, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winter Haven, Florida, United States

Site Status

Newnan, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Meridian, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Elizabethtown, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

South Traverse, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Olive Branch, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Southfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Washington, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Hartsdale, New York, United States

Site Status

New Windsor, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Perrysburg, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Willoughby Hills, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Norman, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Lansdale, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Reading, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Sellersville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Rock Hill, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Brentwood, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Spring Hill, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Victoria, Texas, United States

Site Status

South Bountiful, Utah, United States

Site Status

West Jordon, Utah, United States

Site Status

West Layton, Utah, United States

Site Status

Chesapeake, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Suffolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Butterfield, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Site Status

Tasmania, , Australia

Site Status

Anderlecht, Brussels Capital, Belgium

Site Status

Genk, Limburg, Belgium

Site Status

Gozée, , Belgium

Site Status

Kortrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Yvoir, , Belgium

Site Status

Coquitiam, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Coquitlam, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Rimouski, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Dresden, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Leipzig, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Tauranga, Bay of Plenty, New Zealand

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Durban, , South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Rondebosch, , South Africa

Site Status

Stellenbosch, , South Africa

Site Status

Thabazimbi, , South Africa

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Belgium Canada Germany New Zealand South Africa

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Topless R, Noorbaloochi S, Merriman TR, Singh JA. Change in serum urate level with urate-lowering therapy initiation associates in the immediate term with patient-reported outcomes in people with gout. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2022 Oct;56:152057. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2022.152057. Epub 2022 Jun 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35835008 (View on PubMed)

Tausche AK, Alten R, Dalbeth N, Kopicko J, Fung M, Adler S, Bhakta N, Storgard C, Baumgartner S, Saag K. Lesinurad monotherapy in gout patients intolerant to a xanthine oxidase inhibitor: a 6 month phase 3 clinical trial and extension study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Dec 1;56(12):2170-2178. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex350.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29029210 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-003756-39

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

RDEA594-303

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Gout Dose Response Study
NCT00955981 COMPLETED PHASE2