Sacroiliac Joint Fusion With iFuse Implant System (SIFI)

NCT ID: NCT01640353

Last Updated: 2017-03-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

194 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-07-31

Study Completion Date

2016-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of the iFuse Implant System to treat degenerative sacroiliitis (arthritis of the SI joint) and sacroiliac disruption (abnormal separation or tearing of the sacroiliac joint). The iFuse Implant System (iFuse device) is a medical device that is surgically implanted into the sacroiliac (SI) joint during a minimally invasive surgical procedure (one that uses a smaller incision and less damage to the skin and other tissues than standard surgery). The purpose of implanting the device is to stabilize and fuse the SI joint.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Degenerative Sacroiliitis Sacroiliac Joint Disruption

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1\. Age 21-70 at time of screening

2\. Patient has lower back pain for \>6 months inadequately responsive to conservative care

3\. Diagnosis of sacroiliac joint disruption or degenerative sacroiliitis based on ALL of the following:

1. Patient has pain at or close to the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) with possible radiation into buttocks, posterior thigh or groin and can point with a single finger to the location of pain (Fortin Finger Test), and
2. Patient has at least 3 of 5 physical examination maneuvers specific for the SI joint (see Table 3), and
3. Patient has improvement in lower back pain numeric rating scale (NRS) of at least 50% after injection of local anesthetic into affected SI joint(s) (see Section 3.6.4), and
4. One or more of the following:

i. SI joint disruption:

1. Asymmetric SI joint widening on X-ray or CT scan
2. Leakage of contrast on diagnostic arthrography

ii. Degenerative sacroiliitis:

1. Radiographic evidence of SI joint degeneration, including sclerosis,osteophytes, subchondral cysts, or vacuum phenomenon on CT or plain film, or
2. Due to prior lumbosacral spine fusion

4\. Baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of at least 30% 5. Baseline SI joint pain score of at least 50 on 0-100 mm visual analog scale 6. Patient has signed study-specific informed consent form 7. Patient has the necessary mental capacity to participate and is physically able to comply with study protocol requirements

Exclusion Criteria

1. Severe back pain due to other causes, such as lumbar disc degeneration, lumbar disc herniation, lumbar spondylolisthesis, lumbar spinal stenosis, lumbar facet degeneration, and lumbar vertebral body fracture
2. Other known sacroiliac pathology such as:

1. Sacral dysplasia
2. Inflammatory sacroiliitis (e.g., ankylosing spondylitis or other HLA-associated spondyloarthropathy)
3. Tumor
4. Infection
5. Acute fracture
6. Crystal arthropathy
3. History of recent (\< 1 year) major trauma to pelvis
4. Previously diagnosed osteoporosis (defined as prior T-score \<-2.5 or history of osteoporotic fracture).
5. Osteomalacia or other metabolic bone disease
6. Chronic rheumatologic condition (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis)
7. Any condition or anatomy that makes treatment with the iFuse Implant System infeasible
8. Chondropathy
9. Known allergy to titanium or titanium alloys
10. Use of medications known to have detrimental effects on bone quality and soft-tissue healing
11. Prominent neurologic condition that would interfere with physical therapy
12. Current local or systemic infection that raises the risk of surgery
13. Patient currently receiving or seeking worker's compensation, disability remuneration, and/or involved in injury litigation.
14. Currently pregnant or planning pregnancy in the next 2 years
15. Patient is a prisoner or a ward of the state.
16. Known or suspected drug or alcohol abuse
17. Diagnosed psychiatric disease (e.g., schizophrenia, major depression, personality disorders) that could interfere with study participation
18. Patient is participating in an investigational study or has been involved in an investigational study within 3 months prior to evaluation for participation
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

SI-BONE, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bradley Duhon, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Colorado, Denver

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Spine and Neuro Center

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Silicon Valley Spine

Campbell, California, United States

Site Status

BASIC Spine

Newport Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Southern California Center for Neuroscience and Spine (SCCNS)

Pomona, California, United States

Site Status

St. Mary's Spine

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Neurosurgical and Spine Specialists

Parker, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Orthopaedic Clinic of Daytona Beach

Daytona Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

The Orthopaedic Institute/NFRMC

Gainsville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Bartow Regional Medical Center

Lakeland, Florida, United States

Site Status

Piedmont Orhopaedics

Macon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Orthopaedic Center of Southern Illinois

Mount Vernon, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Bluegrass Orthopaedics & Hand Care Research

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Columbia Orthopaedic Group

Columbia, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Midwest Division-RMC, LLC,-Research Medical Center

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Mercy Medical Research Institute

Springfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Alice Peck Day Memorial Hospital

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Manhattan Orthopedic Spine, PLLC

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Orthopedic and Reconstructive Center (formally)Health Research Institute

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Allegheny General Hospital

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

East Tennesse Brain & Spine Center

Johnson City, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Brazos Spine

College Station, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Back Institute

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

Precision Spine Care

Tyler, Texas, United States

Site Status

Virginia Spine Institute

Reston, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Overlake Hospital Medical Center

Bellevue, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dat KO, Cher D, Polly DW. Effects of BMI on SI joint fusion outcomes: examining the evidence to improve insurance guidelines. Spine J. 2024 May;24(5):783-790. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.11.015. Epub 2023 Dec 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38081463 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

300101

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)
NCT04073563 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Advanced Materials Science in XLIF Study
NCT03649490 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Lumbar Interbody Implant Study
NCT04418830 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Modulus in XLIF Study
NCT04418817 COMPLETED