Acute Versus Subacute Angioplasty in Patients With NON-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

NCT ID: NCT01638806

Last Updated: 2019-04-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

500 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-06-30

Study Completion Date

2017-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are categorized according to the electrocardiogram (ECG) findings into: 1) patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), 2) patients with Bundle Branch Block Myocardial Infarction (BBBMI), and 3) remaining patients with so-called NON-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NONSTEMI).

Patients with STEMI or BBBMI are treated with acute angioplasty (PPCI=primary percutaneous coronary intervention), and the sooner PPCI is performed the lower is the mortality. This is why prehospital diagnosis and field-triage of patients with STEMI directly to heart centers with PPCI facilities is recommended.

In patients with NONSTEMI previous trials have indicated that early angioplasty, within 72 hours of symptom onset, is associated with improved outcome when compared to late angioplasty or conservative therapy. No trials have so far been able to diagnose patients with NONSTEMI in the prehospital phase or immediately on arrival at a hospital, and triage them directly to PPCI. Implementation of point-of-care (POC) testing of biomarkers may enable prehospital or early inhospital establishment of the diagnosis NONSTEMI.

The aim of the present trial is to identify patients with NONSTEMI in the prehospital phase or immediately on arrival at the local hospital based on a) symptoms, b) POC testing and c) ECG findings and then randomize patients to I) PPCI, or II) medical therapy and angiography/angioplasty within 72 hours (todays routine).

Se below for detailed description

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the present trial patients with a) typical angina pectoris (AP) combined with b1) rise in biomarkers on POC testing (prehospital/immediately inhospital) and/or b2) ST-segment depression of more than 0.2 mV in two contiguous leads or more than 0.1 mV in four contiguous leads are randomized to I) PPCI (same protocol as in STEMI patients) or II) medical therapy and angiography/angioplasty within 72 hours (todays routine practice).

The primary purposes of the present trial is threefold:

1. To evaluate if it is possible to diagnose patients with NONSTEMI in the prehospital phase or immediately on arrival at the hospital (N=250 patients)
2. To compare a combined endpoint of mortality, re-infarction (during index admission or readmitted), or readmission with Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) between group I (PPCI strategy) and group II (routine strategy) (N=2500 patients).
3. To compare mortality between group I and II (N=4500 patients).

Secondary purposes of the present trial is:

1. To evaluate whether there is difference in the primary endpoints in patients randomized within or after 12 hours of symptom onset.
2. To evaluate whether there is difference in the primary endpoints in patients randomized in the prehospital phase and on admission to the hospital, respectively.
3. To evaluate whether there is difference in the primary endpoints in patients with a final diagnosis of AMI, as adjudicated by a clinical event committee.
4. To evaluate whether there is difference in the primary endpoints in patients with or without diabetes, respectively.
5. To compare a combined endpoint of mortality, readmission with AMI, readmission with CHF, readmission with AP, revascularization (not planned on index admission).
6. To compare a combined safety endpoint of stroke or serious bleeding between group I and II.
7. To evaluate if there is difference in the frequency of PCI and CABG in group I versus II.
8. To compare total admission time between group I and II.
9. To compare total cost between group I and II.
10. To compare total duration where the patient is on sick leave between group I and II

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myocardial Infarction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group I: PPCI

Patients are treated with Aspirin, ADP-blocker and heparin and field-triaged or transferred immediately to an invasive center for PPCI

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Group I: Primary PCI

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients are treated with Aspirin, ADP-blocker and heparin and field-triaged or transferred immediately to an invasive center for PPCI

Conventional: Group II

Patients are treated as today: Admission to local hospital, Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), Aspirin, ADP-blocker and within 72 hours transfer for angiography/angioplasty. Patients with a Grace score \> 140 will be transferred for angiography/angioplasty within 24 hours. Patients with refractory angina, severe heart failure, life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias or haemodynamic instability will be transferred acutely for angiography/angioplasty according to the european guidelines.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Group I: Primary PCI

Patients are treated with Aspirin, ADP-blocker and heparin and field-triaged or transferred immediately to an invasive center for PPCI

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

PPCI in NONSTEMI

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Angina
* Elevated biomarkers (Point-of-care testing) either prehospital or immediately on admission
* ST-segment depression of 0.2mV or more in two contiguous leads or 0.1 mV or more in four contiguous leads.
* Patient can be randomized either in the prehospital phase or within 30 minutes of admission to a hospital

Exclusion Criteria

* Tachycardia \> 120
* Age \< 18 or \> 80 years
* Indication for PPCI already fulfilled
* Dementia
* Patient cannot understand the study information
* Presumed "troponisme"
* Left ventricular hypertrophy
* Known dialysis
* Previous CABG
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aarhus University Hospital Skejby

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Christian Juhl Terkelsen

Associate professor, MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christian J Terkelsen, MD,PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of cardiology B, Aarhus University Hospital in Skejby, Denmark

Hans E Bøtker, MD,DmSc,Prof

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of cardiology B, Aarhus University Hospital in Skejby, Denmark

Carsten Stengaard, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of cardiology B, Aarhus University Hospital in Skejby, Denmark

Jacob T Sørensen, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of cardiology B, Aarhus Unversity Hospital in Skejby, Denmark

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital in Skejby

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rasmussen MB, Stengaard C, Sorensen JT, Riddervold IS, Sondergaard HM, Niemann T, Dodt KK, Frost L, Jensen T, Raungaard B, Hansen TM, Giebner M, Rasmussen CH, Botker HE, Kristensen SD, Maeng M, Christiansen EH, Terkelsen CJ. Comparison of Acute Versus Subacute Coronary Angiography in Patients With NON-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (from the NONSTEMI Trial). Am J Cardiol. 2019 Sep 15;124(6):825-832. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jun 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31324357 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NONSTEMI

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.