Randomized Trial of a Quality Improvement Intervention to Decrease D2B Time in Primary PCI for AMI
NCT ID: NCT01625104
Last Updated: 2017-12-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
882 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-09-30
2006-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hospitals randomized to control were instructed to conduct "business as usual".
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1: Aggressive Intervention Strategy
Hospitals were randomized to an aggressive intervention strategy or to "business as usual". The hospitals randomized to the aggressive intervention strategy underwent the following:
1. Grand Rounds conducted by physician and nurse from the Coordinating Center. This included a formal presentation on the evidence supporting rapid time to treatment in STEMI patients and evidence based strategies for reducing treatment delays.
2. Discussion with staff regarding perceived barriers to treatment and suggestions/ideas for strategies to overcome these barriers
3. Follow-up monthly phone conferences to continue to discuss strategies and ideas sharing
4. Written plan from sites detailing plans to change processes of care.
Agressive Intervention Process Improvement Strategies
Group 2: Control Strategy
Hospitals randomized to the control group were instructed to conduct "business as usual".
Non Intervention
Business as usual
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Non Intervention
Business as usual
Agressive Intervention Process Improvement Strategies
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* non ST segment myocardial infarction patients.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation
OTHER
University of Michigan
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Eva Kline-Rogers
Study Coordinator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mauro Moscucci, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Michigan
Eva M Kline-Rogers, MS, RN
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Michigan
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1998-0080
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id