Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
360 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-12-31
2024-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
DANISH-CRT - Does Electric Targeted LV Lead Positioning Improve Outcome in Patients With Heart Failure and Prolonged QRS
NCT03280862
Effect of Remote Ischaemic Conditioning on Clinical Outcomes in STEMI Patients Undergoing PPCI (CONDI2/ERIC-PPCI)
NCT02342522
CorVad Myocardial Infarction Complicated with Cardiogenic Shock Trial
NCT06886113
Danish ICD Study in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy
NCT00542945
Assessment of Primary Prevention Patients Receiving An ICD - Systematic Evaluation of ATP
NCT02923726
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional circulatory support
Patients randomized to conventional circulatory support.
Conventional circulatory support
Control group treated with conventional circulatory support and observed in intensive care unit for a minimum of 48 hrs.
Impella
Patients randomized to Impella CP
Impella CP
Control group treated with Impella CP for a minimum of 48 hrs.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Conventional circulatory support
Control group treated with conventional circulatory support and observed in intensive care unit for a minimum of 48 hrs.
Impella CP
Control group treated with Impella CP for a minimum of 48 hrs.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Cardiogenic shock of less than 24 hours' duration, confirmed by:
* peripheral signs of tissue hypoperfusion (arterial blood lactate ≥2.5mmol/l and/or SvO2 \<55% with a normal PaO2) and
* systolic blood pressure less than 100mmHg and/or need for vasopressor therapy (dopamine/ norepinephrine or epinephrine), and
3. Left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 45% visually estimated or by wall motion score index \>1,6.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Shock due to mechanical complication to myocardial infarction (papillary muscle rupture, rupture of the ventricular septum or rupture of free wall).
3. Severe aorta valve regurgitation/stenosis.
4. Predominant right ventricular failure.
5. Out of hospital cardiac arrest with persistent Glasgow coma scale \<8 after return of spontaneous circulation.
6. Shock duration\>24 hours.
7. Known heparin intolerance.
8. Already established mechanical circulatory support
9. Do not resuscitate wish.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
OTHER
Hannover Medical School
OTHER
University Hospital, Bonn
OTHER
Jena University Hospital
OTHER
University Hospital Dresden
OTHER
Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf
OTHER
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
OTHER
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
OTHER
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Wuerzburg University Hospital
OTHER
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
OTHER
Odense University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jacob Moller
Professor in Cardiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jacob E Moller, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense
Anders Junker, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital
Christian Hassager, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte
Andreas Shaefer, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Hannover Medical School
Nikos Werner, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University Hospital Trier
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
Aarhus, , Denmark
Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Odense University Hospital
Odense, , Denmark
Charite Berlin
Berlin, , Germany
University Hospital Bonn
Bonn, , Germany
Dresden University Hospital
Dresden, , Germany
Düsseldorf University Hospital
Düsseldorf, , Germany
UKE Hamburg
Hamburg, , Germany
Hannover Medical School
Hanover, , Germany
Jena University Hospital
Jena, , Germany
Brüderkrankenhaus Trier
Trier, , Germany
University Hospital Würzburg
Würzburg, , Germany
NHs Harefield Hospital
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Moller JE, Gerke O; DanGer Shock Investigators. Danish-German cardiogenic shock trial-DanGer shock: Trial design update. Am Heart J. 2023 Jan;255:90-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.10.078. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
Udesen NJ, Moller JE, Lindholm MG, Eiskjaer H, Schafer A, Werner N, Holmvang L, Terkelsen CJ, Jensen LO, Junker A, Schmidt H, Wachtell K, Thiele H, Engstrom T, Hassager C; DanGer Shock investigators. Rationale and design of DanGer shock: Danish-German cardiogenic shock trial. Am Heart J. 2019 Aug;214:60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.04.019. Epub 2019 May 6.
Moller JE, Engstrom T, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Clemmensen P, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Werner N, Frydland M, Holmvang L, Kjaergaard J, Sorensen R, Lonborg J, Lindholm MG, Udesen NLJ, Junker A, Schmidt H, Terkelsen CJ, Christensen S, Christiansen EH, Linke A, Woitek FJ, Westenfeld R, Mobius-Winkler S, Wachtell K, Ravn HB, Lassen JF, Boesgaard S, Gerke O, Hassager C; DanGer Shock Investigators. Microaxial Flow Pump or Standard Care in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2024 Apr 18;390(15):1382-1393. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312572. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
Mikkelsen AD, Beske RP, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze C, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Schrage B, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Engstrom T, Holmvang L, Frydland M, Junker AB, Schmidt H, Udesen NLJ, Wachtell K, Terkelsen CJ, Linke A, Kjaergaard J, Moller JE, Hassager C; DanGer Shock Investigators. Systolic Blood Pressure and Microaxial Flow Pump-Associated Survival in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Post Hoc Analysis of the DanGer Shock Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Aug 30:e253337. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2025.3337. Online ahead of print.
Moller JE, Beske RP, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Schrage B, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Werner N, Holmvang L, Kjaergaard J, Engstom T, Udesen NLJ, Schmidt H, Junker A, Wachtell K, Terkelsen CJ, Christensen S, Linke A, Burkhoff D, Hassager C; DanGer Shock Investigators. Effect of Microaxial Flow Pump on Hemodynamics in STEMI-Related Cardiogenic Shock. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Jul 1;85(25):2456-2468. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.04.062.
Klein A, Beske RP, Hassager C, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Linke A, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Clemmensen P, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Werner N, Engstom T, Holmvang L, Junker A, Schmidt H, Terkelsen CJ, Moller JE; DanGer Shock Investigators. Treating Older Patients in Cardiogenic Shock With a Microaxial Flow Pump: Is it DANGERous? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Feb 18;85(6):595-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.11.003. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
Zweck E, Hassager C, Beske RP, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Clemmensen P, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Kelm M, Engstrom T, Holmvang L, Junker A, Schmidt H, Terkelsen CJ, Linke A, Westenfeld R, Moller JE; DanGer Shock Investigators. Microaxial Flow Pump Use and Renal Outcomes in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Secondary Analysis of the DanGer Shock Trial. Circulation. 2024 Dec 17;150(25):1990-2003. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.072370. Epub 2024 Oct 27.
Udesen NLJ, Beske RP, Hassager C, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Clemmensen P, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Werner N, Frydland M, Holmvang L, Kjaergaard J, Engstom T, Schmidt H, Junker A, Terkelsen CJ, Christensen S, Linke A, Moller JE; DanGer Shock Investigators. Microaxial Flow Pump Hemodynamic and Metabolic Effects in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Substudy of the DanGer Shock Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Jan 1;10(1):9-16. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.4197.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DanShock-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.