Preoperative Counseling in Cholecystectomy

NCT ID: NCT01629992

Last Updated: 2012-06-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

119 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-01-31

Study Completion Date

2011-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators examined whether a written plus verbal preoperative counseling for patients undergoing open cholecystectomy would improve perioperative symptoms such as nausea, vomiting and pain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was a randomized, single-blinded, clinical study carried out at the Julio Muller University Hospital (Mato Grosso State, Brazil). This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving human subjects/patients were approved by the hospital Research Ethics Committee registered under number 697/CEP-HUJM/09. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Except for the preoperative counseling which was received only by the intervention group, all patients received the same protocol of perioperative care.

The main endpoint of the study was the presence and the intensity of postoperative symptoms such as nausea, vomiting and pain. A questionnaire containing a visual analogue scale (VAS) was applied 24h after the operation to measure the intensity of postoperative pain, nausea and the well-being. The VAS consisted of a horizontal line, 100 mm in length, anchored by word descriptors at each end to represent the lowest and the highest intensity of all the symptoms analyzed. The patient was asked to mark in the straight line the point that most likely represents the symptom at the moment. The VAS score of each individual was determined by measuring in millimeters from the left end of the line to the point marked. The questions were: "how severe was your pain during this period of 24h after the operation?", "how severe was the intensity of your nausea during this period of 24h after the operation? ", and "how great is your well-being at the present moment". For the first two questions the words at each end of the line were "no pain" and "severe pain", and "no nausea" and "severe nausea". For the well-being question the words were "no well-being" and "greatest well-being". The Vomiting was also recorded as a categorical variable (yes or no). The length of stay and postoperative complications were also collected.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Vomiting Nausea Postoperative Pain Feeling

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Preoperative counseling

The intervention group received preoperative counseling by both orally and written. A written leaflet containing information was provided to each patient of this group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Preoperative counseling

Intervention Type OTHER

The intervention group received preoperative counseling by both orally and written. A written leaflet containing information was provided to each patient of this group.

Control

The control group received no preoperative counseling either oral or written.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Preoperative counseling

The intervention group received preoperative counseling by both orally and written. A written leaflet containing information was provided to each patient of this group.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Preoperative information

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* adult age (18-65 years-old),
* both sexes and
* candidates for an elective open cholecystectomy

Exclusion Criteria

* having diabetes mellitus,
* chronic kidney failure,
* chronic liver disease,
* serum bilirubin \> 2 mg/dL,
* body mass index (BMI) \> 35 kg/m2,
* American Anesthesiologists Association (ASA) score \> 3,
* gastro-esophageal reflux,
* gastroparesis or intestinal obstruction.

Patients with any non-compliance with the study protocol, who had the choledochus opened or associated operations, who experienced severe intraoperative complications (any type of shock, cardiac arrest or coagulations problems) or experienced prolonged (\> 4 h) operative time were also excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Federal University of Mato Grosso

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jose Eduardo de Aguilar-Nascimento

Chairman Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jose Aguilar-Nascimento, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Federal University of Mato Grosso

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Universitario Julio Mullar

Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

697/CEP-HUJM/09

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

preopcounseling

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.