Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
119 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-01-31
2011-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Low-pressure vs Standard-pressure in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT04146090
Clinical Impact of Routine Abdominal Drainage After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT00886210
Structured Remote Surgical Coaching to Improve Operative Performance in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT04512560
Quality of Recovery Under Low or Standard Pneumoperitoneum Pressure
NCT05040022
Cold Application Effects on Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT06008262
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Except for the preoperative counseling which was received only by the intervention group, all patients received the same protocol of perioperative care.
The main endpoint of the study was the presence and the intensity of postoperative symptoms such as nausea, vomiting and pain. A questionnaire containing a visual analogue scale (VAS) was applied 24h after the operation to measure the intensity of postoperative pain, nausea and the well-being. The VAS consisted of a horizontal line, 100 mm in length, anchored by word descriptors at each end to represent the lowest and the highest intensity of all the symptoms analyzed. The patient was asked to mark in the straight line the point that most likely represents the symptom at the moment. The VAS score of each individual was determined by measuring in millimeters from the left end of the line to the point marked. The questions were: "how severe was your pain during this period of 24h after the operation?", "how severe was the intensity of your nausea during this period of 24h after the operation? ", and "how great is your well-being at the present moment". For the first two questions the words at each end of the line were "no pain" and "severe pain", and "no nausea" and "severe nausea". For the well-being question the words were "no well-being" and "greatest well-being". The Vomiting was also recorded as a categorical variable (yes or no). The length of stay and postoperative complications were also collected.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Preoperative counseling
The intervention group received preoperative counseling by both orally and written. A written leaflet containing information was provided to each patient of this group.
Preoperative counseling
The intervention group received preoperative counseling by both orally and written. A written leaflet containing information was provided to each patient of this group.
Control
The control group received no preoperative counseling either oral or written.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Preoperative counseling
The intervention group received preoperative counseling by both orally and written. A written leaflet containing information was provided to each patient of this group.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* both sexes and
* candidates for an elective open cholecystectomy
Exclusion Criteria
* chronic kidney failure,
* chronic liver disease,
* serum bilirubin \> 2 mg/dL,
* body mass index (BMI) \> 35 kg/m2,
* American Anesthesiologists Association (ASA) score \> 3,
* gastro-esophageal reflux,
* gastroparesis or intestinal obstruction.
Patients with any non-compliance with the study protocol, who had the choledochus opened or associated operations, who experienced severe intraoperative complications (any type of shock, cardiac arrest or coagulations problems) or experienced prolonged (\> 4 h) operative time were also excluded.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Federal University of Mato Grosso
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jose Eduardo de Aguilar-Nascimento
Chairman Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jose Aguilar-Nascimento, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Federal University of Mato Grosso
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Universitario Julio Mullar
Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
697/CEP-HUJM/09
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
preopcounseling
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.