Clinical Impact of Routine Abdominal Drainage After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT ID: NCT00886210
Last Updated: 2009-04-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-10-31
2008-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Efficacy and Safety of Using Prophylactic Abdominal Drainage After Cholecystectomy
NCT05267860
Drainage or Not for Laparoscopic Cholecystetomy
NCT03909360
Optimum-pressure for Reducing Postoperative Shoulder-tip Pain in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT04212936
Optimizing Pain Management Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy RCT
NCT05214157
Low-pressure vs Standard-pressure in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT04146090
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Under general anesthesia, and same antibiotics (3rd generation cephalosporin) Surgery was performed using conventional four ports umbilical port, port below xiphoid and two ports below right costal margin. Pneumoperitonum at pressure 12 mmHg. In group A nelton catheter (no 20) was inserted at the end of operation.
The Intraoperative parameter observed included duration of the operation, amount of CO2 used in the operation, bile escape, saline irrigation during operation and volume of blood loss were recorded.
The patients started oral feeding 8 hours (h) postoperatively; abdominal ultrasound was done for all patients in both groups on day of discharge to show any collection or free fluid in the abdomen. The patients were usually discharged after removal of drain, and when the patient surgically free.
Postoperative pain was evaluated at 6 h, 24 h, 48, 1 week after operation using a visual analog scale (VAS) with which each patients noted the severity of pain at each evaluated time using a linear between zero (no pain) and 10 (severe pain). Postoperative analgesia in the form of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) was administered intramuscularly when required. If the patients still complained of pain and required strong analgesic, (1 mg/kg pethidine intramuscularly) was administered. The total dose of these medications were recorded.
Postoperative maximum body temperatures were recorded at (6 h, 24 h, and 48 h) for all patients.
PONV were assessed postoperative after 6 h, 24 h and after 48 h. Metocloprpamide was given if the patients required reduction of nausea and the total dose of this medication was recorded. The frequency of vomiting was recorded.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1LC with drain
Under general anesthesia, and same antibiotics (3rd generation cephalosporin). Surgery was performed using conventional four ports umbilical port, port below xiphoid and two ports below right costal margin. Pneumoperitonum at pressure 12 mmHg. In group A nelton catheter (no 20) inserted at the end of operation.
intra abdominal drain
Under general anesthesia, and same antibiotics (3rd generation cephalosporin). Surgery was performed using conventional four ports umbilical port, port below xiphoid and two ports below right costal margin. Pneumoperitonum at pressure 12 mmHg. In group A nelton catheter (no 20) inserted at the end of operation.
2LC without drain
Under general anesthesia, and same antibiotics (3rd generation cephalosporin). Surgery was performed using conventional four ports umbilical port, port below xiphoid and two ports below right costal margin. Pneumoperitonum at pressure 12 mmHg. no drain at the end of operation.
LC without drain
Under general anesthesia, and same antibiotics (3rd generation cephalosporin). Surgery was performed using conventional four ports umbilical port, port below xiphoid and two ports below right costal margin. Pneumoperitonum at pressure 12 mmHg. In group no drain at the end of operation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
intra abdominal drain
Under general anesthesia, and same antibiotics (3rd generation cephalosporin). Surgery was performed using conventional four ports umbilical port, port below xiphoid and two ports below right costal margin. Pneumoperitonum at pressure 12 mmHg. In group A nelton catheter (no 20) inserted at the end of operation.
LC without drain
Under general anesthesia, and same antibiotics (3rd generation cephalosporin). Surgery was performed using conventional four ports umbilical port, port below xiphoid and two ports below right costal margin. Pneumoperitonum at pressure 12 mmHg. In group no drain at the end of operation.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* patients with acute cholecystitis
* patients with history of upper laparotomy
* patients with a hemorrhagic tendency due to cirrhosis
* patients refused to give informed consent and patients who were converted to open cholecystectomy
21 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mansoura University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mansoura University
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ayman Elnakeeb, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mansoura University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ayman Elnakeeb
Al Mansurah, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hawasli A, Brown E. The effect of drains in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1994 Dec;4(6):393-8. doi: 10.1089/lps.1994.4.393.
Uchiyama K, Tani M, Kawai M, Terasawa H, Hama T, Yamaue H. Clinical significance of drainage tube insertion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14(6):551-6. doi: 10.1007/s00534-007-1221-x. Epub 2007 Nov 30.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Mansoura university hospital
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
abdominal drainage
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.