Clinical Impact of Routine Abdominal Drainage After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

NCT ID: NCT00886210

Last Updated: 2009-04-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-10-31

Study Completion Date

2008-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients and methods: 100 patients were included in this study. They divided into two groups, group (A) with drain and group (B) without drain. The investigators recorded the effect of drainage on, postoperative pain (Po-P) using visual analogue scale VAS at 6, 24, 48 hours and 1 week postoperative nausea/vomiting at 6, 24, 48 hours postoperative, abdominal collection, hospital stay, chest complication, and postoperative body temperature.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The patients were randomized into two groups using enclosed envelope. Group (A) with drain included 50 patients, and group (B) without drain included 50 patients.

Under general anesthesia, and same antibiotics (3rd generation cephalosporin) Surgery was performed using conventional four ports umbilical port, port below xiphoid and two ports below right costal margin. Pneumoperitonum at pressure 12 mmHg. In group A nelton catheter (no 20) was inserted at the end of operation.

The Intraoperative parameter observed included duration of the operation, amount of CO2 used in the operation, bile escape, saline irrigation during operation and volume of blood loss were recorded.

The patients started oral feeding 8 hours (h) postoperatively; abdominal ultrasound was done for all patients in both groups on day of discharge to show any collection or free fluid in the abdomen. The patients were usually discharged after removal of drain, and when the patient surgically free.

Postoperative pain was evaluated at 6 h, 24 h, 48, 1 week after operation using a visual analog scale (VAS) with which each patients noted the severity of pain at each evaluated time using a linear between zero (no pain) and 10 (severe pain). Postoperative analgesia in the form of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) was administered intramuscularly when required. If the patients still complained of pain and required strong analgesic, (1 mg/kg pethidine intramuscularly) was administered. The total dose of these medications were recorded.

Postoperative maximum body temperatures were recorded at (6 h, 24 h, and 48 h) for all patients.

PONV were assessed postoperative after 6 h, 24 h and after 48 h. Metocloprpamide was given if the patients required reduction of nausea and the total dose of this medication was recorded. The frequency of vomiting was recorded.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Abdominal Drainage Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Gall Stones

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1LC with drain

Under general anesthesia, and same antibiotics (3rd generation cephalosporin). Surgery was performed using conventional four ports umbilical port, port below xiphoid and two ports below right costal margin. Pneumoperitonum at pressure 12 mmHg. In group A nelton catheter (no 20) inserted at the end of operation.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

intra abdominal drain

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Under general anesthesia, and same antibiotics (3rd generation cephalosporin). Surgery was performed using conventional four ports umbilical port, port below xiphoid and two ports below right costal margin. Pneumoperitonum at pressure 12 mmHg. In group A nelton catheter (no 20) inserted at the end of operation.

2LC without drain

Under general anesthesia, and same antibiotics (3rd generation cephalosporin). Surgery was performed using conventional four ports umbilical port, port below xiphoid and two ports below right costal margin. Pneumoperitonum at pressure 12 mmHg. no drain at the end of operation.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

LC without drain

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Under general anesthesia, and same antibiotics (3rd generation cephalosporin). Surgery was performed using conventional four ports umbilical port, port below xiphoid and two ports below right costal margin. Pneumoperitonum at pressure 12 mmHg. In group no drain at the end of operation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

intra abdominal drain

Under general anesthesia, and same antibiotics (3rd generation cephalosporin). Surgery was performed using conventional four ports umbilical port, port below xiphoid and two ports below right costal margin. Pneumoperitonum at pressure 12 mmHg. In group A nelton catheter (no 20) inserted at the end of operation.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

LC without drain

Under general anesthesia, and same antibiotics (3rd generation cephalosporin). Surgery was performed using conventional four ports umbilical port, port below xiphoid and two ports below right costal margin. Pneumoperitonum at pressure 12 mmHg. In group no drain at the end of operation.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Group A Group B

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients with gallbladder stones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Exclusion Criteria

* patients above 80 years old
* patients with acute cholecystitis
* patients with history of upper laparotomy
* patients with a hemorrhagic tendency due to cirrhosis
* patients refused to give informed consent and patients who were converted to open cholecystectomy
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mansoura University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mansoura University

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ayman Elnakeeb, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mansoura University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ayman Elnakeeb

Al Mansurah, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hawasli A, Brown E. The effect of drains in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1994 Dec;4(6):393-8. doi: 10.1089/lps.1994.4.393.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 7881142 (View on PubMed)

Uchiyama K, Tani M, Kawai M, Terasawa H, Hama T, Yamaue H. Clinical significance of drainage tube insertion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14(6):551-6. doi: 10.1007/s00534-007-1221-x. Epub 2007 Nov 30.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18040619 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://home.mans.eun.eg/

Mansoura university hospital

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

abdominal drainage

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.