Safety and Efficacy Study of Dual-axis Rotational Versus Standard Coronary Angiography
NCT ID: NCT01625533
Last Updated: 2015-06-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
576 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-06-30
2013-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Relationship Between Level of GPCR Autoantibodies and Cardiac Structure & Funtions Based on UCG and CMR
NCT05368584
Risk Evaluation by COronary CTA and Artificial IntelliGence Based fuNctIonal analyZing tEchniques - II
NCT05856110
Coronary Artery Geometry and the Severity of Coronary Atherosclerosis
NCT04185493
Routinely Deferred Versus Early Intervention in Elderly Patients With Non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction
NCT02900001
A New Classification and Interventional Therapy for Coronary Artery Ectasia
NCT04265989
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SA group
Patients using SA for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease are assigned to the SA group.
Standard Coronary Angiography
Using standard coronary angiography (SA) for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
DARCA group
Patients using DARCA for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease are assigned to the DARCA group.
Dual-axis Rotational Coronary Angiography
Using dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA) for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Standard Coronary Angiography
Using standard coronary angiography (SA) for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
Dual-axis Rotational Coronary Angiography
Using dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA) for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* A clinical indication for diagnostic coronary angiography to evaluate possible CAD
Exclusion Criteria
* Known allergy to iodinated contrast
* Renal insufficiency (\>1.5mg/dL)
* Cardiogenic shock
* Acute myocardial infarction within one week
* Prior coronary artery bypass graft treatment
* Prior percutaneous coronary intervention treatment
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
General Hospital of Chinese Armed Police Forces
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Liu Huiliang, M.D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Division of Cardiology, General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Beijing 100039, China
Jin Zhigeng, M.M.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Division of Cardiology, General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Beijing 100039, China
Luo Jianping, M.M.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Division of Cardiology, General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Beijing 100039, China
Yang Shengli, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Division of Cardiology, General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Beijing 100039, China
Ma Dongxing, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Division of Cardiology, General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Beijing 100039, China
Liu Ying, M.M.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Division of Cardiology, General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Beijing 100039, China
Han Wei, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Division of Cardiology, General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Beijing 100039, China
Jing Limin, B.S.M.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Division of Cardiology, General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Beijing 100039, China
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Division of Cardiology, General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Garcia JA, Agostoni P, Green NE, Maddux JT, Chen SY, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Hansgen A, Wink O, Movassaghi B, Groves BM, Van Den Heuvel P, Verheye S, Van Langenhove G, Vermeersch P, Van den Branden F, Yeghiazarians Y, Michaels AD, Carroll JD. Rotational vs. standard coronary angiography: an image content analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 May 1;73(6):753-61. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21918.
Maddux JT, Wink O, Messenger JC, Groves BM, Liao R, Strzelczyk J, Chen SY, Carroll JD. Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography versus standard angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004 Jun;62(2):167-74. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20036.
Empen K, Kuon E, Hummel A, Gebauer C, Dorr M, Konemann R, Hoffmann W, Staudt A, Weitmann K, Reffelmann T, Felix SB. Comparison of rotational with conventional coronary angiography. Am Heart J. 2010 Sep;160(3):552-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.06.011.
Gomez-Menchero AE, Diaz JF, Sanchez-Gonzalez C, Cardenal R, Sanghvi AB, Roa-Garrido J, Rodriguez-Lopez JL. Comparison of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (XPERSWING) versus conventional technique in routine practice. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2012 May;65(5):434-9. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2011.12.014. Epub 2012 Apr 1. English, Spanish.
Grech M, Debono J, Xuereb RG, Fenech A, Grech V. A comparison between dual axis rotational coronary angiography and conventional coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Oct 1;80(4):576-80. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23415. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
Klein AJ, Garcia JA, Hudson PA, Kim MS, Messenger JC, Casserly IP, Wink O, Hattler B, Tsai TT, Chen SY, Hansgen A, Carroll JD. Safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography vs. standard coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 May 1;77(6):820-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22804. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
Liu HL, Jin ZG, Yang SL, Luo JP, Ma DX, Liu Y, Han W. Randomized study on the safety and efficacy of dual-axis rotational versus standard coronary angiography in. Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Mar;125(6):1016-22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20120601
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.