Neuromonitoring During the Latarjet Procedure

NCT ID: NCT01621126

Last Updated: 2016-05-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-06-30

Study Completion Date

2014-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In a study performed by the Harvard Shoulder Service, it has been documented that there is a significant incidence of neurologic complications of the Latarjet procedure for shoulder instability. 5 out of 52 patients had neurologic complaints post-operatively. 3 of these nerve palsies were transient, however 2 had not yet recovered fully at time of latest follow-up and returned to the operating room for exploration and neurolysis of the axillary nerve and brachial plexus.

By using intra-operative neuromonitoring to determine exactly when there is a potential nerve injury during the procedure, the investigators will be able to modify what the investigators do at that step of the procedure, in order to decrease or possibly even eliminate the risk of neurologic injury.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators propose to study the intra-operative events which put nerves at risk during the Latarjet procedure. By using neuromonitoring to determine exactly when there is a potential nerve injury during the procedure, the investigators will be able to modify what the investigators do at that step of the procedure, in order to decrease or possibly even eliminate the risk of neurologic injury. Modifications to our surgical technique in response to events observed on neuromonitoring would include repositioning the operative shoulder and upper extremity, and repositioning or removing retractors. The investigators believe this would lead to a significant decrease in the incidence of neurologic complications post-operatively. Since this operation is usually performed on young, active patients, the benefits of reducing or eliminating these complications would have a far-reaching impact both for the individual and for society. Above all, the investigators feel that this is an important patient safety initiative.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Shoulder Instability Iatrogenic Nerve Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intra-op neuromonitoring

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intra-operative neuromonitoring (XLTEK/NATUS EP Protektor)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Device: Intra-operative neuromonitoring A XLTEK/NATUS EP Protektor machine (at MGH) or a Cadwell Cascade Elite neuromonitoring machine (at BWH), both FDA approved for intra-operative neuromonitoring, will deliver the electrical stimulus applied transcranially to stimulate the motor cortex, while motor evoked responses will be recorded from different myotomes from both upper limbs. Also the same equipment will deliver electrical stimulus to stimulate peripherally the median and ulnar nerves at the wrists, with recording of the thalamocortical potentials in the scalp channels.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intra-operative neuromonitoring (XLTEK/NATUS EP Protektor)

Device: Intra-operative neuromonitoring A XLTEK/NATUS EP Protektor machine (at MGH) or a Cadwell Cascade Elite neuromonitoring machine (at BWH), both FDA approved for intra-operative neuromonitoring, will deliver the electrical stimulus applied transcranially to stimulate the motor cortex, while motor evoked responses will be recorded from different myotomes from both upper limbs. Also the same equipment will deliver electrical stimulus to stimulate peripherally the median and ulnar nerves at the wrists, with recording of the thalamocortical potentials in the scalp channels.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients of the two senior surgeons who will undergo the Latarjet procedure for shoulder instability will be considered for inclusion in the study.
* Our patients who have received prior approval from their insurance carrier to cover neuromonitoring during the surgical procedure will be enrolled.

Exclusion Criteria

* Relative contraindications to transcranial electrical stimulation include: history of seizures, significant brain trauma, cerebral edema with mass effect, recent CVA, intracerebral devices (e.g., shunts, aneurysmal clips), skull defect and cardiac pacemaker. Patients with there conditions will be included in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Brigham and Women's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jon JP Warner

Chief, MGH Shoulder Service

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jon JP Warner, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Massachussetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Shah AA, Butler RB, Romanowski J, Goel D, Karadagli D, Warner JJ. Short-term complications of the Latarjet procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Mar 21;94(6):495-501. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01830.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22318222 (View on PubMed)

Nagda SH, Rogers KJ, Sestokas AK, Getz CL, Ramsey ML, Glaser DL, Williams GR Jr. Neer Award 2005: Peripheral nerve function during shoulder arthroplasty using intraoperative nerve monitoring. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007 May-Jun;16(3 Suppl):S2-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.01.016. Epub 2006 Jul 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17493556 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011P000188

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Results of Rotator Cuff Repair
NCT01549912 COMPLETED
Glenohumeral Cortisone Injection
NCT04216017 COMPLETED PHASE2