Interscalene Block Versus Infraclavicular Block Plus Suprascapular Nerve Block

NCT ID: NCT02993939

Last Updated: 2017-05-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-12-31

Study Completion Date

2017-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Despite their reliability and efficacy for shoulder surgery analgesia, above clavicle brachial plexus blocks are related with phrenic nerve palsy and diaphragm paralysis that may not be tolerated in patients with chronic pulmonary disease.

This RCT will compare the classic Interscalene block with combined infraclavicular block plus suprascapular nerve block in patients going for arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Main outcome is static pain in the recovery room measured with NRS. Secondary outcomes are pain at 12 and 24 hrs and incidence of diaphragmatic paralysis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PATIENT RECRUITMENT

With the approval of the Ethics Committee of Hospital Clinico Universidad de Chile, 40 patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery will be recruited. Enrollment will be carried out by an investigator not involved in patient care. Patients' confidentiality will be protected.

STUDY PROTOCOL: GENERAL

All blocks will be performed by one of the coauthors and conducted preoperatively in an induction room. Sedation (2 mg midazolam and 50 μg fentanyl) will be provided for patient comfort.

STUDY PROTOCOL: PERFORMANCE OF THE BLOCK

Both study groups will receive an ultrasound-guided superficial cervical plexus block.

In the ICB-SSB group, suprascapular nerve blocks will be carried out using a previously described technique. For infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks, 20 mL of levobupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5 µg/mL will be injected dorsal to the axillary artery, medial to the coracoid process.

In the ISB group, block will carried out using a previously described technique: 20 mL of levobupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5 µg/mL will be deposited under the prevertebral fascial between the C5 and C6 roots.

STUDY PROTOCOL: GENERAL ANESTHESIA

All patients will undergo standardized general anesthesia

STUDY PROTOCOL: POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA

In the Recovery Room, all patients will receive acetaminophen (usual dose…) and ketoprofen (usual dose…) as well as patient controlled analgesia (morphine bolus = 1 mg; lockout interval = 8 minutes). On the surgical ward, all subjects will continue to receive acetaminophen (usual dise…), celecoxib (usual dose…) as well and patient controlled analgesia (morphine bolus = 1 mg IV; lockout interval = 8 minutes).

STUDY PROTOCOL: OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome will be the pain score in the PACU at 30 30 minutes using a sensorimotor composite scale:

Performance time, sensorimotorSensory function, Onset time

The blinded investigator will also assess the presence of hemidiaphragmatic block at 30 minutes. A 2-6 MHz curvilinear US probe (Sonosite M-Turbo, SonoSite Inc, Bothell, WA, USA) and the M-mode will be employed in all subjects; the liver and spleen will serve as acoustic windows on the right and left side, respectively. Patients will be scanned along the anterior axillary line and the US probe, angled cranially

POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF THE STUDY This study will allow us to determine if ICB-SSB constitutes a viable alternative to ISB.

POTENTIAL SIDE EFFECTS OF THE STUDY Participation in this protocol will not put patients at higher risk for complications since ISB and ICB-SSB are commonly used to provide analgesia for shoulder surgery

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Shoulder Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Interscalene block

Ultrasound guided Brachial plexus block injecting 20 ml of levobupivacaine 0,25% plus epinephrine 5 micrograms per ml, in the Interscalene groove.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Interscalene block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ultrasound guided single shot block above the clavicle

Diaphragm-sparing block

Ultrasound guided combinated infraclavicular-Suprascapular block of the braquial plexus, injecting 20 ml of levobupivacaine 0,25% plus epinephrine 5 micrograms per ml dorsal to the axillary artery in the infraclavicular fossa plus an Ultrasound guided injection of 10 ml of levobupivacaine 0,25% plus epinephrine 5 micrograms per ml in the suprascapular fossa.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Infraclavicular-suprascapular block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Combined block of nerves far away from phrenic nerve

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Interscalene block

Ultrasound guided single shot block above the clavicle

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Infraclavicular-suprascapular block

Combined block of nerves far away from phrenic nerve

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age between 18 and 75 years
* American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 1-3
* body mass index between 20 and 30

Exclusion Criteria

* adults who are unable to give their own consent
* pre-existing neuropathy (assessed by history and physical examination)
* coagulopathy (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. platelets ≤ 100, International Normalized Ratio ≥ 1.4 or prothrombin time ≥ 50)
* obstructive or restrictive pulmonary disease (assessed by history and physical examination)
* renal failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. creatinine ≥ 100)
* hepatic failure (assessed by history and physical examination and, if deemed clinically necessary, by blood work up i.e. transaminases ≥ 100)
* allergy to local anesthetics (LAs)
* pregnancy
* prior surgery in the neck, infraclavicular region or suprascapular fossa
* chronic pain syndromes requiring opioid intake at home
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Chile

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Julian Aliste

MD Clinical Instructor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Clinico Universidad de Chile

Santiago, Metropolitan, Chile

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Chile

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Neal JM, Gerancher JC, Hebl JR, Ilfeld BM, McCartney CJ, Franco CD, Hogan QH. Upper extremity regional anesthesia: essentials of our current understanding, 2008. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Mar-Apr;34(2):134-70. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31819624eb.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19282714 (View on PubMed)

Urmey WF, Talts KH, Sharrock NE. One hundred percent incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis associated with interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia as diagnosed by ultrasonography. Anesth Analg. 1991 Apr;72(4):498-503. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199104000-00014.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 2006740 (View on PubMed)

Martinez J, Sala-Blanch X, Ramos I, Gomar C. Combined infraclavicular plexus block with suprascapular nerve block for humeral head surgery in a patient with respiratory failure: an alternative approach. Anesthesiology. 2003 Mar;98(3):784-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200303000-00031. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12606927 (View on PubMed)

Tran DQ, Dugani S, Finlayson RJ. A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided and landmark-based superficial cervical plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Nov-Dec;35(6):539-43. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181faa11c.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20975470 (View on PubMed)

Chan CW, Peng PW. Suprascapular nerve block: a narrative review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;36(4):358-73. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182204ec0.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21654552 (View on PubMed)

Tran DQ, Bertini P, Zaouter C, Munoz L, Finlayson RJ. A prospective, randomized comparison between single- and double-injection ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Jan-Feb;35(1):16-21. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181c7717c.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20048654 (View on PubMed)

Spence BC, Beach ML, Gallagher JD, Sites BD. Ultrasound-guided interscalene blocks: understanding where to inject the local anaesthetic. Anaesthesia. 2011 Jun;66(6):509-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06712.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21568985 (View on PubMed)

Flohr-Madsen S, Ytrebo LM, Valen K, Wilsgaard T, Klaastad O. A randomised placebo-controlled trial examining the effect on hand supination after the addition of a suprascapular nerve block to infraclavicular brachial plexus blockade. Anaesthesia. 2016 Aug;71(8):938-47. doi: 10.1111/anae.13504.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27396247 (View on PubMed)

Lloyd T, Tang YM, Benson MD, King S. Diaphragmatic paralysis: the use of M mode ultrasound for diagnosis in adults. Spinal Cord. 2006 Aug;44(8):505-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101889. Epub 2005 Dec 6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16331304 (View on PubMed)

Dhir S, Sondekoppam RV, Sharma R, Ganapathy S, Athwal GS. A Comparison of Combined Suprascapular and Axillary Nerve Blocks to Interscalene Nerve Block for Analgesia in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: An Equivalence Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):564-71. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000436.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27380105 (View on PubMed)

Aliste J, Bravo D, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. A randomized comparison between interscalene and combined infraclavicular-suprascapular blocks for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Can J Anaesth. 2018 Mar;65(3):280-287. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-1048-0. Epub 2017 Dec 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29270914 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

853/16

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.