Ultrasound Image Quality of the Brachial Plexus at the Interscalene Space Before and After Shoulder Arthroscopy

NCT ID: NCT03657173

Last Updated: 2019-01-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-06-18

Study Completion Date

2018-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Ultrasound guided interscalene nerve blockade with local anesthesia is a standard regional anesthetic technique for providing postoperative analgesia during shoulder arthroscopy and wide variety of shoulder procedures. There is a paucity of data regarding the effects of shoulder arthroscopy on ultrasound image quality, including the effects of muscle mobilization and the use of large volume irrigation and subsequent tissue absorption, though increased neck circumference and airway edema are known complications of arthroscopic shoulder procedures.

The objective of the study is to determine if there is a difference in ultrasound image quality of the interscalene block anatomy, by Likert scale, pre- versus post-operatively in a cohort of patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy who routinely receive blockade of the brachial plexus for postoperative analgesia. Further, if there are differences in imaging quality, correlations with surgical and patient factors will be studied.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Postoperative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject is undergoing shoulder procedures involving arthroscopy
* Subject has consented to interscalene blockade for postoperative analgesia

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient refusal
* Contraindications to interscalene blockade, including significant pulmonary insufficiency, hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis, brachial plexus or degenerative neuropathy
* Allergy to proposed local anesthetic medication\\
* Severe cervical spine disease.
* BMI \>40 kg/m2
* Neck Circumference \> 50cm
* Failed preoperative interscalene blockade
* Patients known to be currently pregnant or actively breastfeeding
* Patients where English is a language barrier
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bridget P. Pulos

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Panchamia JK, Jagannathan R, Pulos BP, Amundson AW, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Martin DP, Smith HM. The effects of shoulder arthroscopy on ultrasound image quality of the interscalene brachial plexus: a pre-procedure vs post-procedure comparative study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jul 9;21(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01409-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34243720 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18-004131

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Rotator Cuff Pathway
NCT03717753 COMPLETED NA