Facial Analysis to Classify Difficult Intubation

NCT ID: NCT01612949

Last Updated: 2025-04-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

3500 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-05-31

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this project is to develop a computer algorithm that can accurately predict how easy or difficult it is to intubate a patient based upon digital photographs from three different perspectives. Such an application can provide a consistent, quantitative measure of intubation difficulty by analyzing facial features in captured photographs - features which have previously been shown to correlate with how easy or how hard it would be to perform the intubation procedure. This is in contrast to established subjective protocols that also serve to predict intubation difficulty, albeit with lower accuracy. A digital application has the potential to decrease potential complications related to intubation difficulty and increase patient safety.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Both control and experimental cohorts will be recruited in this study. In order to drive clinical acceptance of this technique, the investigators will need to study and then demonstrate applicability to all patients regardless of race or gender. This will require the recruitment of a control population of patients who have been demonstrated at surgery to be easy to intubate. Such patients are in relative abundance. The experimental group will consist of patients who are found at surgery to be difficult to intubate. In addition, a prospective cohort will be recruited without prior knowledge of ease or difficulty of intubation, and subsequent ground truth determined at surgery. Patients are defined as easy to intubate if their anesthetic record described a single attempt with a Macintosh 3 blade resulting in a grade 1 laryngoscopic view (full exposure of the vocal cords). Difficult intubation was defined by at least one of: more than one attempt by an operator with at least one year of anesthesia experience, grade 3 or 4 laryngoscopic view on a 4 point scale, 5 need for a second operator, or non-elective use of an alternative airway device such as a bougie, fiberoptic bronchoscope or intubating laryngeal mask airway.

The primary purpose of the study is to develop algorithms capable of discriminating patients who are likely to be difficult to intubate from those who are likely to be easy to intubate based on facial appearance. The primary analysis is the demonstration of statistical significance in the ability of the derived algorithms to determine successfully whether a subject was easy or difficult to intubate. A secondary analysis is the demonstration of a statistical difference in performance between the derived algorithms versus conventional airway assessment tests.

An ongoing modification of the protocol will allow anesthesia personnel to attempt intubation with a Miller (straight) laryngoscope blade, instead of a Macintosh blade. This secondary outcome was chosen because of the strong preference, and in some cases, better skill, with such a blade. It is possible that different facial features will predict difficulty with this blade than has been predicted to date with a Macintosh blade.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Difficult Intubation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

easy to intubate, model derivation

easy to intubate, model derivation. photographing head and neck

photographing head and neck

Intervention Type OTHER

Taking three photographs of head and neck-one photograph from front, one from left and one fron right. The photographs are analyzed by facial structure software to create face model.

difficult to intubate, model derivation

difficult to intubate, model derivation.photographing head and neck

photographing head and neck

Intervention Type OTHER

Taking three photographs of head and neck-one photograph from front, one from left and one fron right. The photographs are analyzed by facial structure software to create face model.

easy to intubate, model validation

easy to intubate, model validation. photographing head and neck

photographing head and neck

Intervention Type OTHER

Taking three photographs of head and neck-one photograph from front, one from left and one fron right. The photographs are analyzed by facial structure software to create face model.

difficult to intubate, model validation

difficult to intubate, model validation. photographing head and neck

photographing head and neck

Intervention Type OTHER

Taking three photographs of head and neck-one photograph from front, one from left and one fron right. The photographs are analyzed by facial structure software to create face model.

Test

A group of unlabeled subjects (mix of easy and difficult intubations) to test the reproducibility of the derived and validated model(s)

photographing head and neck

Intervention Type OTHER

Taking three photographs of head and neck-one photograph from front, one from left and one fron right. The photographs are analyzed by facial structure software to create face model.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

photographing head and neck

Taking three photographs of head and neck-one photograph from front, one from left and one fron right. The photographs are analyzed by facial structure software to create face model.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients requiring endotracheal intubation
* Patients consenting to acquisition of photographic images of the head and neck

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who had undergone head or neck surgery
* Patients in whom central venous catheters or other interventions that prevent full view of the features of the face in frontal and profile views
* Patients who were neither easy nor difficult to intubate by our criteria
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Scott Segal, MD, MHCM

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Scott Segal, MD, MHCM

Role: CONTACT

(336) 716-7084

Angela Goodson

Role: CONTACT

336-716-4497

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Scott Segal, MD

Role: primary

336-716-4497

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Connor CW, Segal S. Accurate classification of difficult intubation by computerized facial analysis. Anesth Analg. 2011 Jan;112(1):84-93. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31820098d6. Epub 2010 Nov 16.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21081769 (View on PubMed)

Tavolara TE, Gurcan MN, Segal S, Niazi MKK. Identification of difficult to intubate patients from frontal face images using an ensemble of deep learning models. Comput Biol Med. 2021 Sep;136:104737. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104737. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34391000 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB00036442

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.