Comparison of Reduced Cuff-pressure of the Laryngeal Tube Under General Anesthesia
NCT ID: NCT02300337
Last Updated: 2015-01-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-11-30
2015-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Endotracheal Tube Intracuff Pressure and Leak
NCT02376179
Comparison of Two Strategies for Endotracheal Tube Cuff Underinflation Prevention During Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
NCT03330379
Efficiency of a Mechanical Device in Controlling Tracheal Cuff Pressure in Intubated Critically Ill Patients
NCT02109003
Comparison of Endotracheal Intracuff Pressure Between Two Cuff Sealing Methods
NCT03385044
Cuff Leak Test and Airway Obstruction in Mechanically Ventilated ICU
NCT03372707
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The user of this method has only knowledge of the volume (ml), with which the cuff is vented, but not over the cuff pressure (cmH₂O) itself.
Permanently high pressures can cause to a lesions to necrosis in the adjacent tissue, on the other hand, the material of the bulging cuff fits less well the anatomy of the patient, leading to leaks in the breathing circuit.
Studies of pediatric anesthesia show that on 40cmH₂O reduces the volume of the leak in the laryngeal mask airway by reducing the cuff pressure and the ventilation is improved in sequence.
In the proposed study, the volume of leakage at the fill volume specified by the manufacturer (color coding), 60cmH₂O, 50cmH₂O, 40cmH₂O and 30cmH₂O to be captured.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Reduce Cuff Pressure
Cuff Pressure difference between inspiration and expiration is measured.
Reduce Cuff pressure
We reduce the Cuff Pressure from the LTS-D (Laryngeal Tube suction) from 60 to 50 to 40 to 30cmH2O and measure the Delta from Inspiration to Expiration Tidalvolume (Delta Vt). The Delta Vt shows the actual leakage.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Reduce Cuff pressure
We reduce the Cuff Pressure from the LTS-D (Laryngeal Tube suction) from 60 to 50 to 40 to 30cmH2O and measure the Delta from Inspiration to Expiration Tidalvolume (Delta Vt). The Delta Vt shows the actual leakage.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* No concurrent participation in another study
* capacity to consent
* Present written informed consent of the research participant
* Elective surgery under general anesthesia
* Height\> 150cm
Exclusion Criteria
* Existing pregnancy
* Lack of consent
* inability to consent
* emergency patients
* Emergency situations in the context of a Difficult Airway Management
* ASA classification\> 3
* situations where the possibility of accumulated gastric contents
* Indications for intubation with endotracheal tube
* Height \<150cm
* Participation in another study
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marc Kriege
Marc Kriege,MD, Rüdiger Noppens, MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rüdiger Noppens, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University JG, Mainz
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Anesthesiology,Prof. C. Werner, Universitätsmedizin of the JG University
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Janig C, Marquardt S, Dietze T, Nitsche T. Laryngeal tube placement on manikin by laypersons: is there a possibility for 'public access airway management'? Eur J Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;21(1):65-8. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328364a152.
Kriege M, Alflen C, Eisel J, Ott T, Piepho T, Noppens RR. Evaluation of the optimal cuff volume and cuff pressure of the revised laryngeal tube "LTS-D" in surgical patients. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Feb 2;17(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0308-4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
JohannesGU
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.