IOK Treatment Study

NCT ID: NCT01605799

Last Updated: 2016-02-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

33 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-10-31

Study Completion Date

2015-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goals of this project are

* 1\) to evaluate the effectiveness of a CBT treatment module addressing the mental health and functional impact of killing in the war zone,
* 2\) to gather data on Veteran stakeholders' perceptions of acceptability and feasibility of the CBT treatment module, which would be used to further refine the intervention, and
* 3\) to gather data on clinician stakeholders' perceptions of acceptability and feasibility of the CBT treatment module, which would be used to ensure that the module could be easily integrated into EBT for PTSD.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: There is mounting evidence that Veterans from multiple eras who kill in war are at increased risk for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), alcohol abuse, suicide, and functional difficulties after returning home. Despite high rates of exposure to killing and associated maladaptive responses, the military and VA do not routinely assess exposure to killing, which could assist with prevention and treatment efforts. Furthermore, the impact of killing is not currently addressed as a component of evidence-based treatment (EBT) for PTSD. In fact, in the current system, a Veteran can receive PTSD evaluation and evidence-based treatment without ever being asked about killing and its impact. Some researchers have cautioned against using one type of PTSD treatment, one commonly used in the VA, suggesting that it may be harmful for these patients. Consequently, it is possible that failing to directly treat the mental health impact of killing could result in inappropriate treatment, cause harm to Veterans, and cost lives.

Objectives: Our first aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of a CBT treatment module addressing the mental health and functional impact of killing in the war zone, which would be added onto existing EBT for PTSD. Our second aim is to gather data on Veteran stakeholders' perceptions of acceptability and feasibility of the CBT treatment module, which would be used to further refine the intervention. Our third aim is to gather data on clinician stakeholders' perceptions of acceptability and feasibility of the CBT treatment module, which would be used to ensure that the module could be easily integrated into EBT for PTSD.

Methods: The investigators propose a 12-month pilot, cross-sectional Hybrid Type 2 study, given that The investigators will be adding a treatment module to existing EBT for PTSD. The investigators will conduct a randomized, controlled effectiveness trial to better understand if the six-week treatment module addressing the impact of killing has added benefit, compared to PTSD treatment as usual (N = 50). The investigators will employ a concurrent design mixed method study to test the perceptions of Veteran stakeholders who receive the treatment module, obtaining ratings of acceptability and feasibility through self-report measures and interviews. The investigators also will interview clinicians who provide EBT for PTSD, and interviews will be guided by Roger's five intrinsic characteristics, as outlined in his Diffusion of Innovations Theory.

Impact: Through involving Veteran and clinician stakeholders, the main impact of this project will be to obtain information that will assist in revising the CBT treatment module and help prepare for implementing the module in already existing settings, where EBT for PTSD is provided.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

IOK Treatment

Six to eight week treatment lasting one to 1.5 hours addressing maladaptive cognitions related to killing in war.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

IOK Killing Treatment

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The IOK Killing Treatment is based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy theory and principals and target maladaptive cognitions related to killing in war.

Wait list control group

Participants in this group will not receive treatment; however, at the end of 6 weeks, they will be offered the option of receiving treatment.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

IOK Killing Treatment

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The IOK Killing Treatment is based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy theory and principals and target maladaptive cognitions related to killing in war.

Wait list control group

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants in this group will not receive treatment; however, at the end of 6 weeks, they will be offered the option of receiving treatment.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

IOK Killing Treatment

The IOK Killing Treatment is based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy theory and principals and target maladaptive cognitions related to killing in war.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Wait list control group

Participants in this group will not receive treatment; however, at the end of 6 weeks, they will be offered the option of receiving treatment.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Combat Veterans ranging in age from 18-70 years will be recruited to participate in this study. Combat veterans ranging in age from 70 to 90 years will also be considered for enrollment in the study on a case-by-case basis.
* Veterans will need to endorse having taken a life in a war zone context, to meet criteria for PTSD, and to have received some prior treatment for PTSD to be included in the study.
* Participants in current PTSD treatment will not be excluded; however, if receiving medications, they will need to be stabilized on current medications for at least one month.
* If receiving Prolonged Exposure (PE) or Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT), the two treatments the VA recognizes as evidence-based treatment for PTSD, individuals will need to wait two weeks after they have completed the treatment in order to enroll in the study, and new baseline measures will be obtained at that time.

Exclusion Criteria

* Potential participants will only be excluded if they meet current or lifetime criteria for a psychotic disorder.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shira Maguen, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Maguen S, Burkman K. Combat-Related Killing: Expanding Evidence-Based Treatments for PTSD. Cognitive and behavioral practice. 2013 Nov 1; 20(4):476-479.

Reference Type RESULT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RRP 12-237

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Loving-Kindness Meditation for PTSD
NCT01962714 COMPLETED NA