Can Nebivolol Reverse Inappropriate Left Ventricular Mass in Hypertensive Patients?
NCT ID: NCT01605370
Last Updated: 2014-05-19
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
1 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-06-30
2013-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study Evaluating the Effects of Nebivolol on Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients
NCT00200460
A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Nebivolol in Hypertensive Patients
NCT00200473
Effect of Nebivolol on Oxidative Stress and Endothelial Progenitor Cells
NCT01041287
Comparison of Nebivolol and Metoprolol With Exercise and Angiotensin II in Hypertensive Patients
NCT01502787
Evaluation of the Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Metoprolol Versus Nebivolol in Patients With Hypertension
NCT00142584
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Ventricular mass is inappropriate when its amount surpasses the physical need of the ventricle to sustain the elevated workload. Therefore, ventricular mass can be inappropriate even in patients without arterial hypertension or without hypertrophy identified by echocardiography (echo). We can mathematically predict an appropriate amount of mass and observe the actual mass in individual patients based on ventricular workload and wall thickness, respectively, noninvasively evaluated by echo. By comparing the observed ventricular mass to the predicted one, we determine whether its amount is inappropriate. It follows that by therapeutically normalizing blood pressure in hypertension and thus eliminating the elevated workload, then any ventricular hypertrophy represents an inappropriate mass.
Inappropriate ventricular mass is proven to have a detrimental effect on long-term cardiovascular event-free survival, and ventricular hypertrophy is increasingly recognized as a potent risk factor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and all-cause mortality. Ventricular performance is altered in hypertension with inappropriate mass, but this alteration can be subtle enough to escape detection using current echocardiography measures. Hence, patients with hypertension, who have inappropriate left ventricular mass, need to be specifically identified by analysis of the predicted and observed ventricular mass, and the therapeutic goal must include management of elevated blood pressure as well as reversal of the excessive ventricular mass.
In this double-blind prospective study, patients with hypertension and inappropriate ventricular mass will be randomized to therapy with nebivolol or metoprolol to find out whether nebivolol could reverse inappropriate left ventricular mass, thus providing a benefit beyond what is achieved by mere blood pressure reduction alone. If confirmed, this will represent a significant ancillary ability of nebivolol and be a key step towards therapy of inappropriate ventricular mass, which is a so far unmanaged cardiovascular risk and a poor event-free prognostic factor.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Nebivolol
Subjects randomized to this arm will receive Nebivolol 2.5 mg once daily.
Nebivolol
Nebivolol 2.5 mg once daily
Metoprolol succinate
Subjects randomized to this arm will receive metoprolol succinate 50 mg once daily.
Metoprolol succinate
Metoprolol succinate 50 mg once daily
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nebivolol
Nebivolol 2.5 mg once daily
Metoprolol succinate
Metoprolol succinate 50 mg once daily
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presence of phenotype of inappropriate LVM.
Exclusion Criteria
* Reactive airways disease including asthma.
* Diabetes mellitus or hypoglycemia; thyrotoxicosis.
* LV dysfunction (ejection fraction \< 50%) or heart failure.
* Present or previously documented coronary heart disease or angina.
* Acute myocardial infarction, or history of myocardial infarction.
* Severe bradycardia, heart block greater than first degree or sick sinus syndrome (unless a permanent pacemaker is in place).
* Hepatic insufficiency or history of cirrhosis.
* Chronic renal failure or renovascular dysfunction.
* Cerebrovascular dysfunction.
* Peripheral vascular disease.
* Pregnant or nursing women; women of childbearing age will be required to take a pregnancy test at the time of enrollment and use an acceptable method of birth control.
* Poor echo image quality.
30 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Forest Laboratories
INDUSTRY
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marek Belohlavek
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marek Belohlavek, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mayo Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinic Arizona
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
11-007035
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.