Nebivolol Versus Metoprolol: Comparative Effects on Fatigue and Quality of Life
NCT ID: NCT00999102
Last Updated: 2018-10-19
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
37 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-10-31
2011-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A new vasodilating beta-blocker, nebivolol, which is approved by the FDA for treatment of hypertension, appears to be far less associated with fatigue than are most currently available beta-blockers. The purpose of this study is to compare nebivolol with the current best-selling beta-blocker, metoprolol, and determine whether there is a significant difference in side effects including fatigue, reduced exertion tolerance, and reduced quality of life.
In this study, 30 subjects will take each of the 2 study drugs for 8 weeks, consisting of 4 weeks at a lower dose, and 4 weeks at a higher dose. All dosages are FDA-approved for treatment of hypertension. Subjects and investigators will not know which drug is being administered until completion of the study. Subjects will undergo a treadmill stress test and will complete fatigue and quality of life questionnaires after each 4 weeks of treatment. An echocardiogram and non-invasive measurement of aortic blood pressure will be performed after 8 weeks on each drug. Also, blood will be drawn and stored for possible measurement of drug levels, after 4 and 8 weeks on each drug. Results on each drug will then be compared. If nebivolol is found to cause significantly less fatigue, it would be of substantial importance to the many millions of people who are on life-long beta-blocker therapy, and are living with reduced energy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of 2 Beta Blocker Drugs on Peripheral Arterial Disease in Patients With High Blood Pressure
NCT01499134
The Impact of Nebivolol Versus Metoprolol on Quality of Life
NCT01441570
Nebivolol Versus Metoprolol: Sodium Sensitivity
NCT00992056
Evaluation of the Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Metoprolol Versus Nebivolol in Patients With Hypertension
NCT00142584
Effect of Nebivolol on Oxidative Stress and Endothelial Progenitor Cells
NCT01041287
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Methods: a double-blinded crossover trial comparing nebivolol with metoprolol. Experimental procedures: Subjects will undergo electrocardiogram and routine blood testing, unless such tests have been performed within 6 months and are available for review. Subjects entered into the study will receive each of the two study drugs for 8 weeks. Metoprolol succinate will be given at a dose of 50 mg daily for 4 weeks, then 100 mg daily for 4 weeks. For nebivolol, dosage will be 5 mg daily for 4 weeks and 10mg daily for 4 weeks. Identical-appearing pills will be given, and the drugs will be given in randomized order without a placebo run-in period.
At the end of each 4-week treatment period on each drug, subjects will undergo a treadmill stress test (using the standard Cornell protocol), complete Quality of Life and fatigue questionnaires, and have blood drawn and frozen for later analysis for drug levels.
At the end of 8 weeks of treatment on each drug, subjects will undergo echocardiography and applanation tonometry (non-invasive measurement of aortic blood pressure) to assess heart function.
At the end of the study, the blinded subjects will be asked which of the two study drugs they preferred, and the extent to which their energy differed between the two drugs.
-Rationale: Millions of hypertensive patients are on life-long beta-blocker therapy. In many, it reduces cardiac output and increases peripheral resistance to blood flow (1). It is well-established that beta-blockers cause fatigue in many patients and reduce exertion tolerance. Every physician knows this, and tacitly accepts that many patients are living with this unwelcome side effect.
A new beta-blocker, nebivolol, has the standard beta-blocking effects, but also produces blood vessel relaxation (vasodilation), probably through increased secretion of the vasodilator nitric oxide. Studies indicate that nebivolol, unlike most beta-blockers, does not cause constriction of peripheral blood vessels, and is associated with improved heart function (2). Studies suggest that it is also less likely to cause fatigue (3).
Personal experience is consistent with this, as I have observed marked improvement in energy in patients in whom I have prescribed nebivolol in place of a different beta-blocker. The possibility of placebo effect of course cannot be excluded. Nevertheless, the known hemodynamic differences between nebivolol and other beta-blockers, and the positive clinical experience, warrant formal study to determine whether nebivolol is kinder than other beta-blockers in terms of the important side effect of fatigue.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Nebivolol, followed by Metoprolol
Participants first received Nebivolol at a dose of 5 mg daily for 4 weeks, followed by 10 mg daily for another 4 weeks (i.e., weeks 1-8 in total). The participants then received Metoprolol at a dose of 50 mg daily for 4 weeks, followed by 100 mg daily for another 4 weeks (i.e., weeks 9-16 in total).
Metoprolol
Metoprolol 50 mg, Metoprolol 100 mg,
Nebivolol
Nebivolol 5 mg, Nebivolol 10 mg.
Metoprolol, followed by Nebivolol
Participants first received Metoprolol at a dose of 50 mg daily for 4 weeks, followed by 100 mg daily for another 4 weeks (i.e., weeks 1-8 in total). The participants then received Nebivolol at a dose of 5 mg daily for 4 weeks, followed by 10 mg daily for another 4 weeks (i.e., weeks 9-16 in total)
Metoprolol
Metoprolol 50 mg, Metoprolol 100 mg,
Nebivolol
Nebivolol 5 mg, Nebivolol 10 mg.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Metoprolol
Metoprolol 50 mg, Metoprolol 100 mg,
Nebivolol
Nebivolol 5 mg, Nebivolol 10 mg.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Stroke or heart attack within the previous 1 year
* Symptomatic coronary disease within the past year (angina, shortness of breath)
* Clinically significant pulmonary disease (e.g. emphysema or asthma).
* Poorly controlled hypertension (blood pressure above 160 systolic or 100 diastolic)
* Patients with contra-indications to taking a beta-blocker (asthma or bradyarrhythmia)
* History of tachyarrhythmia (abnormal rapid heart rate)
21 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Forest Laboratories
INDUSTRY
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Samuel J Mann, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Weill Cornell Medical College
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0901010162
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.