A Study Examining the Effects of Nebivolol Compared to Atenolol on Endothelial Function

NCT ID: NCT01522950

Last Updated: 2020-07-17

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

76 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-05-31

Study Completion Date

2016-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the efficacy of nebivolol and atenolol at improving small artery elasticity and reducing cardiovascular disease risk in subjects with early vascular disease. Approximately 75 subjects with borderline/elevated blood pressures and impaired endothelial function, as measured by arterial elasticity scores, will be recruited and assigned to treatment groups using a block randomization scheme. Patients will be randomly allocated to nebivolol, atenolol or placebo, and then followed for 9 months.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Rasmussen Disease Score (RDS) test panel is the chosen methodology for this study. The 10 parameters of the RDS were selected because of their ability to quantify early structural and functional abnormalities in the vasculature and left ventricle which appear long before cardiovascular disease is present.

The RDS tests include: large and small artery elasticity (measured by pulse contour analysis), resting blood pressure, mild treadmill exercise test, carotid IMT, left ventricle mass, ECG, retinal vasculature evaluation, as well as quantification of serum NT-proBNP, and microalbuminuria. Quantitative results from these tests are converted into categorical classifications based on values stratified by age and gender when appropriate. The categorical data is scored as follows: normal = 0 points, borderline = 1 point, abnormal = 2 points. Point values from all parameters are summed to create the RDS, with values ranging from 0-20. Scores of 0-2 are classified as normal, 3-5 as early disease, and 6+ as advanced disease. Previous research has shown that the RDS is a powerful predictor of future cardiovascular events.

The small artery elasticity (C2) parameter is of particular interest as it is responsive to changes in NO levels and is an effective and reliable predictor of future hypertension and other cardiovascular events. Changes in C2 will serve as the primary outcome of this study. Similar studies using anti-hypertensive or lipid-lowering interventions have found significant improvements in C2 values.

Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) measurements will also be measured as an index of endothelial function, although this method appears to be less sensitive to functional changes related to NO bioavailability than C2. Utilizing both FMD and C2 will allow comparison with previous studies and take advantage of a large sample size to further examine the relative sensitivity of each method for reliably measuring endothelial dysfunction.

The duration of intervention for this study is 9 months which is the minimum time to adequately detect improvement in left ventricle (LV) mass values. LV mass measurements are a critical component of a comprehensive assessment of cardiovascular health and have improved within this temporal window as a result of anti-hypertensive intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Nebivolol

5 mg, continue for 1 month; dose titration to 10 mg, continue for 8 months. Dose may be returned to initiation levels if side effects occur.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Nebivolol

Intervention Type DRUG

5 mg daily or 10 mg daily

Atenolol

25 mg, continue for 1 month; dose titration to 50 mg, continue for 8 months. Dose may be returned to initiation levels if side effects occur.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

atenolol

Intervention Type DRUG

25 mg daily or 50 mg daily

Placebo

Continue for 1 month; dose titration to "high dose" placebo, continue for 8 months. Dose may be returned to initiation levels if side effects occur.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

one tablet daily

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Nebivolol

5 mg daily or 10 mg daily

Intervention Type DRUG

atenolol

25 mg daily or 50 mg daily

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

one tablet daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* borderline blood pressure (120-145/80-90 mm Hg);
* borderline or abnormal small artery elasticity (C2) as measured by pulse contour analysis;
* treatment-naive for all blood pressure medications including diuretics for at least 30 days prior to baseline visit;
* able to walk on a treadmill for 3 minutes;
* female patients with reproductive potential must use an approved contraceptive method if appropriate (for example, intrauterine device \[IUD\], birth control pills, or barrier device during and for 1 month after the last dose of study drug;
* voluntary written informed consent before performance of any study-related procedure not part of normal medical care, with the understanding that consent may be withdrawn by the subject at any time without prejudice to future medical care.

Exclusion Criteria

* history of intolerance to beta-blockers or clear contraindications to their use; current pharmaceutical treatment of blood pressure;
* known history of cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, unstable angina, uncontrolled arrhythmias, stroke, etc.);
* known history of diabetes; known history of hepatic, renal or gastrointestinal disorder;
* known history of any illness that may cause additional risk (as determined by study investigator);
* pregnant or lactating women \[when used during pregnancy, beta-blockers may cause fetal harm\];
* participation in a concomitant clinical trial.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Forest Laboratories

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Minnesota

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jay N Cohn, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Minnesota Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Duprez DA, Florea N, Duval S, Koukol C, Cohn JN. Effect of nebivolol or atenolol vs. placebo on cardiovascular health in subjects with borderline blood pressure: the EVIDENCE study. J Hum Hypertens. 2017 Dec;32(1):20-25. doi: 10.1038/s41371-017-0019-9. Epub 2017 Nov 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29184167 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CV-2014-20226

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.