Concentration of Antimicrobials in Catheter-lock Solutions
NCT ID: NCT01592032
Last Updated: 2015-02-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
125 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-05-31
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Currently, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Guidelines for treatment and management of CRB, recommends to change the antibiotic solution every 24 hours.
The investigators expect to determine the stability of the concentration of vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, daptomycin and tigecycline used in lock solutions, and thus to assay the optimal timeframe that the concentration of antibiotic used in lock solution keeps its in vivo antimicrobial activity.
Study Hypothesis: An antibiotic lock solution maintains in vivo concentration and antimicrobial activity for at least 10 days after its infusion inside a subcutaneous port catheter.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Antibiotic Treatment for Infections of Short Term In-dwelling Vascular Catheters Due to Gram Positive Bacteria
NCT00037050
Mino-Lok Therapy (MLT) for the Treatment of CRBSI/CLABSI
NCT02901717
Antimicrobial Solution or Saline Solution in Maintaining Catheter Patency and Preventing Catheter-Related Blood Infections in Patients With Malignancies
NCT01101412
Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Vancomycin-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Ethanol Lock Solution for the Curative Treatment of Implantable Venous Access Port Infection Due to Coagulase-negative Staphylococci
NCT02411331
Linezolid in the Treatment of Hemodialysis Patients With Catheter-Related Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infections
NCT00108433
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods: Randomized, open, block allocation according to time of indwelling of the antimicrobial-lock within the ports, unicentric, clinical trial in patients older than 18 years old with a venous port implanted at Clínica Universidad de Navarra. Intevention: Randomization of 5 patients into one of five antimicrobial-lock solution arms for 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient. Any study arm can be stopped at any time from day 1 to day 10, in case of antimicrobial concentration would be less than 1 mg/mL.
At the end of each antimicrobial lock time frame of ports (1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 days), the antimicrobial concentration will be determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and corrected by urea gradient. The cut-off for the median antimicrobial concentration is 1 mg/mL.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Vancomycin antimicrobial-lock
Vancomycin antimicrobial-lock solution. Dosage: 2 mg/mL. Dosage form: liquid in syringe. Frequency: 1. Duration: from 1 to 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient.
Vancomycin antimicrobial-lock solution
Randomization of 5 patients into vancomycin antimicrobial-lock solution arm for 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient. The arm can be stopped any time from day 1 to day 10 in case of antimicrobial concentration less than 1 mg/mL.
Teicoplanin antimicrobial-lock
Teicoplanin antimicrobial-lock solution. Dosage: 10 mg/mL. Dosage form: liquid in syringe. Frequency: 1. Duration: from 1 to 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient.
Teicoplanin antimicrobial-lock solution
Randomization of 5 patients into teicoplanin antimicrobial-lock solution arm for 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient. The arm can be stopped any time from day 1 to day 10 in case of antimicrobial concentration less than 1 mg/mL.
Linezolid antimicrobial-lock
Linezolid antimicrobial-lock solution. Dosage: 1.8 mg/mL. Dosage form: liquid in syringe. Frequency: 1. Duration: from 1 to 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient.
Linezolid antimicrobial-lock solution
Randomization of 5 patients into linezolid antimicrobial-lock solution arm for 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient. The arm can be stopped any time from day 1 to day 10 in case of antimicrobial concentration less than 1 mg/mL.
Daptomycin antimicrobial-lock
Daptomycin antimicrobial-lock solution. Dosage: 5 mg/mL. Dosage form: liquid in syringe. Frequency: 1. Duration: from 1 to 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient.
Daptomycin antimicrobial-lock solution
Randomization of 5 patients into daptomycin antimicrobial-lock solution arm for 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient. The arm can be stopped any time from day 1 to day 10 in case of antimicrobial concentration less than 1 mg/mL.
Tigecycline antimicrobial-lock
Tigecycline antimicrobial-lock solution. Dosage: 4.5 mg/mL. Dosage form: liquid in syringe. Frequency: 1. Duration: from 1 to 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient.
Tigecycline antimicrobial-lock solution
Randomization of 5 patients into tigecycline antimicrobial-lock solution arm for 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient. The arm can be stopped any time from day 1 to day 10 in case of antimicrobial concentration less than 1 mg/mL.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vancomycin antimicrobial-lock solution
Randomization of 5 patients into vancomycin antimicrobial-lock solution arm for 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient. The arm can be stopped any time from day 1 to day 10 in case of antimicrobial concentration less than 1 mg/mL.
Teicoplanin antimicrobial-lock solution
Randomization of 5 patients into teicoplanin antimicrobial-lock solution arm for 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient. The arm can be stopped any time from day 1 to day 10 in case of antimicrobial concentration less than 1 mg/mL.
Linezolid antimicrobial-lock solution
Randomization of 5 patients into linezolid antimicrobial-lock solution arm for 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient. The arm can be stopped any time from day 1 to day 10 in case of antimicrobial concentration less than 1 mg/mL.
Daptomycin antimicrobial-lock solution
Randomization of 5 patients into daptomycin antimicrobial-lock solution arm for 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient. The arm can be stopped any time from day 1 to day 10 in case of antimicrobial concentration less than 1 mg/mL.
Tigecycline antimicrobial-lock solution
Randomization of 5 patients into tigecycline antimicrobial-lock solution arm for 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 days according to HPLC corrected by urea gradient. The arm can be stopped any time from day 1 to day 10 in case of antimicrobial concentration less than 1 mg/mL.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Intravenous access port inserted more than 3 days before informed consent form signing patient. In this case, a blood sample from the catheter will be drawn for blood culture before administration of the antibiotic lock solution.
* Informed Consent Form Signed.
Exclusion Criteria
* Reported allergy or intolerance to the antibiotic employed for study lock solutions.
* Patients receiving oral, intravenous or intramuscular antibiotic treatment at the moment of inclusion in the clinical trial.
* Patients receiving oral, intravenous or subcutaneous anticoagulant treatment, in a higher dose than the one used for venous thrombosis prophylaxis at the moment of inclusion in the clinical trial.
* Patients younger than 18 years old.
* Pregnant women or women in nursing period.
* Personal incapacity to subscribe the informed consent to participate in the clinical trial.
Patient Replacement Criteria:
All patients and/or their legal representatives will be inform that they can leave the clinical trial in whenever they wish to do it, without prejudice to their medical attention.
Also, according to the criteria of the principal investigator, a patient could be separated from the clinical trial. The reasons to separate a patient from the study and replace him/her are:
* Severe adverse reaction that could threat the life of the patient.
* Resolution of the patient or from his/her legal representative to abandon the study.
* No attend to the extraction visit date.
* Development of clinical inconveniences that may indicate to abandon the study in behalf of the patient.
* While antibiotic lock solution is within the port, manipulation or use of the port for administration of any kind of medication or fluid.
* Impossibility to extract 4 ml of the antibiotic lock solution from the port.
* Impossibility to extract 5 ml of peripheral blood sample at the moment of extraction of the antibiotic lock solution.
* Use of any of the prohibited medications during the antibiotic lock solution is inside the port.
* Intentionally wish of the patient in abandoning the study before or after antibiotic lock solution has been administered, or while the antibiotic lock solution is inside the port.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Navarrra Hospital (Clinica Universitaria)
OTHER
Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
José Luis del Pozo
Medical Doctor, Ph. D.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
JOSE L DEL POZO, MD. Ph. D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Clinica Universidad de Navarra
CESAR E BUSTOS, MD.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Clinica Universidad de Navarra
AITZIBER AGUINAGA, Pharm. D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Clinica Universidad de Navarra
JOSE R YUSTE, MD. Ph.D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Clinica Universidad de Navarra
JOSE R AZANZA, MD. Ph.D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Clinica Universidad de Navarra
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clinica Universidad de Navarra
Pamplona, Navarre, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Del Pozo JL, Rodil R, Aguinaga A, Yuste JR, Bustos C, Montero A, Espinosa G, Garcia-Fernandez N. Daptomycin lock therapy for grampositive long-term catheter-related bloodstream infections. Int J Clin Pract. 2012 Mar;66(3):305-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02830.x.
Del Pozo JL, Garcia Cenoz M, Hernaez S, Martinez A, Serrera A, Aguinaga A, Alonso M, Leiva J. Effectiveness of teicoplanin versus vancomycin lock therapy in the treatment of port-related coagulase-negative staphylococci bacteraemia: a prospective case-series analysis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009 Nov;34(5):482-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.06.020. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
del Pozo JL. Role of antibiotic lock therapy for the treatment of catheter-related bloodstream infections. Int J Artif Organs. 2009 Sep;32(9):678-88. doi: 10.1177/039139880903200918.
Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, Craven DE, Flynn P, O'Grady NP, Raad II, Rijnders BJ, Sherertz RJ, Warren DK. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jul 1;49(1):1-45. doi: 10.1086/599376.
del Pozo JL, Patel R. The challenge of treating biofilm-associated bacterial infections. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Aug;82(2):204-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100247. Epub 2007 May 30.
Sherertz RJ, Boger MS, Collins CA, Mason L, Raad II. Comparative in vitro efficacies of various catheter lock solutions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 May;50(5):1865-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.5.1865-1868.2006.
Fennell JP, O'Donohoe M, Cormican M, Lynch M. Linezolid lock prophylaxis of central venous catheter infection. J Med Microbiol. 2008 Apr;57(Pt 4):534-535. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47665-0.
LaPlante KL, Mermel LA. In vitro activity of daptomycin and vancomycin lock solutions on staphylococcal biofilms in a central venous catheter model. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 Aug;22(8):2239-46. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm141. Epub 2007 Apr 1.
Del Pozo JL, Alonso M, Serrera A, Hernaez S, Aguinaga A, Leiva J. Effectiveness of the antibiotic lock therapy for the treatment of port-related enterococci, Gram-negative, or Gram-positive bacilli bloodstream infections. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009 Feb;63(2):208-12. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.10.004. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
Raad I, Hanna H, Jiang Y, Dvorak T, Reitzel R, Chaiban G, Sherertz R, Hachem R. Comparative activities of daptomycin, linezolid, and tigecycline against catheter-related methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus bacteremic isolates embedded in biofilm. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 May;51(5):1656-60. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00350-06. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
Robinson JL, Tawfik G, Saxinger L, Stang L, Etches W, Lee B. Stability of heparin and physical compatibility of heparin/antibiotic solutions in concentrations appropriate for antibiotic lock therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Nov;56(5):951-3. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki311. Epub 2005 Sep 9.
Labthavikul P, Petersen PJ, Bradford PA. In vitro activity of tigecycline against Staphylococcus epidermidis growing in an adherent-cell biofilm model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Dec;47(12):3967-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.12.3967-3969.2003.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2010-023814-29
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CAS110775
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.