Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-05-31
2013-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis I: A soap and water prewash used prior to brushless scrub further decreases bioburden than brushless scrub alone.
Hypothesis II: Brushless scrub is effective in reducing the bioburden measured just after the application of the brushless scrub within 20 seconds of application for both groups.
Exploratory Hypothesis: We will also compare the bioburden measured before and at 1.5 minutes after application of the brushless scrub for both groups.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
An annotated integrative search of the literature was conducted and conflicting information regarding the use of a prewash prior to the brushless scrub was found. This study can help us utilize the brushless scrub to the fullest capacity and prevent surgical site infections.
The time point at which the outcome measure will be assessed at an individual level will be immediately pre-intervention and also 1.5 minutes after the intervention. For example, within 15 seconds prior to brushless scrub, or prewash, a sample swab will be collected and then another sample swab will be obtained 1.5 minutes later for postintervention measure. The study should take approximately 4 months to complete to get an adequate sample size of individuals for statistical power. The data will be aggregated and presented at a staff in-service within 3 months after data collection and analysis is completed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
No Prewash
Level 1: participants will be swabbed, then application of brushless scrub, swabbed again
No interventions assigned to this group
Prewash
Level 2: participants will be swabbed, perform a wash with soap and water for 1 minute, dry, apply brushless scrub, swabbed again
Prewash
The intervention will be the addition of the prewash utilizing non-antimicrobial soap and water.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Prewash
The intervention will be the addition of the prewash utilizing non-antimicrobial soap and water.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
19 Years
62 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Winthrop University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Theresa Criscitelli
Director of Perioperative Education
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Theresa Criscitelli, MS, RN, CNOR
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Winthrop University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Winthrop University Hospital
Mineola, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Heeg P, Ostermeyer C, Kampf G. Comparative review of the test design Tentative Final Monograph (TFM) and EN 12791 for surgical hand disinfectants. J Hosp Infect. 2008 Oct;70 Suppl 1:22-6. doi: 10.1016/S0195-6701(08)60007-9.
Kampf G, Kramer A. Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004 Oct;17(4):863-93, table of contents. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.4.863-893.2004.
Hubner NO, Kampf G, Kamp P, Kohlmann T, Kramer A. Does a preceding hand wash and drying time after surgical hand disinfection influence the efficacy of a propanol-based hand rub? BMC Microbiol. 2006 Jun 22;6:57. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-6-57.
Kampf G, Ostermeyer C. A 1-minute hand wash does not impair the efficacy of a propanol-based hand rub in two consecutive surgical hand disinfection procedures. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009 Nov;28(11):1357-62. doi: 10.1007/s10096-009-0792-7. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
302192-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id