A Trial of High and Low Pressure Level Settings on a Programmable Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Valve for Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
NCT ID: NCT01570257
Last Updated: 2016-08-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
58 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-09-30
2007-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Volumetrics and Proteomics in Shunted Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
NCT04785560
European Study on Prediction of Outcome in Patients With Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
NCT00874198
Study to Evaluate Efficacy of Shunt Operation for Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
NCT00221091
Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the CereVasc® eShunt® System in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
NCT06498960
Assessment of ShuntCheck Performance Characteristics in Asymptomatic Patients With Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
NCT04011566
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Overdrainage can be prevented or treated by implanting an anti-siphon device (ASD) or changing the opening pressure of the valve (OPV). Different ASDs have been developed since the first publication in 1973. They have in common that the lumen of the catheter is closed under influence of a negative hydrostatic pressure at the level of the ASD. The optimal valve setting for treating INPH is still the subject of controversy. The dilemma in INPH patients is that a low OPV might lead to overdrainage-related symptoms. A high valve setting might lead to underdrainage and the patient misses the chance of maximum improvement.
Studies examining whether to use a low or high OPV have been contradictory so far.
After randomization, baseline primary and secondary outcome measure assessments are conducted preoperatively. Within 24 hours of shunting, skull, thoracic, and abdominal X-rays are done to verify device connections and position. Follow-up visits at 1, 3, and 9 months include all primary and secondary outcome assessments. All measurements are done by a research assistant who visits the participating hospitals to prevent inter-observer variation. Study end for each patient is defined as completing the 9 month visit or death, detection of SDE on CT, or shunt removal or revision due to infection or dysfunction.
The PL in Group 1 (control group) is allowed to be increased to a higher setting when an SDE is detected. The patient thereby reaches study end, and the treating physician is free to decide how to manage the PL. The 9-month follow-up is still obtained. The PL in Group 2 is preset at the highest PL and eventually lowered 1 step at each follow-up visit when the modified mini mental state (3MS) or Gait score is not increased ≥ 15% provided that no SDE is visible on a new CT scan. The 15% is considered the minimum percentage to reliably determine improvement.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
control group
These patients receive a shunt with the valve preset and fixed at a Performance level of 1.0, corresponding to an opening/closing pressure of 35-55 mm H2O.
No interventions assigned to this group
Intervention group
These patients receive a shunt with the valve preset at a Performance level (PL) of 2.5, corresponding to an opening/closing pressure of 135-155 mm H2O. The PL is allowed to be lowered until clinical improvement occurs.
lowering of the performance level of an adjustable Strata valve in a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt for treating idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
in the intervention group, the performance level(PL) of the valve of the VP shunt, preset at the highest PL (meaning highest resistance) is lowered stepwise in the follow-up period at 1,3 and 9 months postoperatively after implantation until improvement occurs or signs of overdrainage are encountered on a new CT scan of the brain. In the control group the PL is preset and fixed at the second lowest PL and these patients serve as a control group.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
lowering of the performance level of an adjustable Strata valve in a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt for treating idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
in the intervention group, the performance level(PL) of the valve of the VP shunt, preset at the highest PL (meaning highest resistance) is lowered stepwise in the follow-up period at 1,3 and 9 months postoperatively after implantation until improvement occurs or signs of overdrainage are encountered on a new CT scan of the brain. In the control group the PL is preset and fixed at the second lowest PL and these patients serve as a control group.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* gait disturbance,
* cognitive impairment and
* urinary incontinence.
* Radiological verification of a communicating hydrocephalus.
* Cerebrospinal fluid pressure at lumbar puncture \< 150 mm H2O.
Exclusion Criteria
* Severe comorbidity.
* Age \> 85 years.
* Possibly confounding neurological diseases.
* Recent meningitis or subarachnoid hemorrhage.
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Isala
OTHER
Albert Schweitzer Hospital
OTHER
UMC Utrecht
OTHER
Atrium Medical Center
OTHER
University Medical Center Nijmegen
OTHER
Admiraal de Ruyter Hospital
OTHER
Medtronic
INDUSTRY
Erasmus Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ernst Delwel
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Clemens MF Dirven, Prof. PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Erasmus Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MEC 03.1073
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.