WHO-HPH Recognition Project on Fast-Track Implementation of Clinical Health Promotion

NCT ID: NCT01563575

Last Updated: 2022-06-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

48 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-01-31

Study Completion Date

2018-09-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The project's background is the notion that patient centred clinical health promotion has been shown to significantly improve both outcomes and patient safety. Accordingly, the WHO describes health promotion as a key dimension of quality in hospitals, and the organization has developed standards on the topic in order to help hospital management and staff members to assess and improve the quality of health care and thereby achieve better health for patients, staff, and community. Even so, however, health promotion is still a very implicit part of nearly all quality standards on hospitals. Moreover, assessing hospitals departments' health promotion performance is still quite an unexplored area. On this basis, this project will test a new recognition process that uses the relevant WHO-HPH tools and standards to assess performance, by way of explicit documentation and evaluation of clinical health promotion activity. The project is deigned as a RCT, with a control group that undergoes the recognition process immediately and a control group that continue usual clinical routine. Then, after one year, the control group also begins the recognition process (= delayed start), while the Intervention group (=immediate-start) continues with the recognition process. Doing this allows for a great array of measurements, and hopefully the project will then show whether the recognition process really benefits implementation of health promotion in hospitals and health services, and also, if this really generates better health gains for patients and staff. The outcome measurements will be frequency of health promotion services delivered on smoking, excessive alcohol use, overweight, malnutrition, and physical activity to patients in need. Such services could for instance be motivational counselling and brief interventions, as well as intervention, rehabilitation and after treatment. Physical, mental, and social health status among patients and staff will be measured by short form (SF36).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Smoking Excessive Drinking Lack of Physical Activity Malnutrition Obesity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention Group

fast-track implementation process

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

fast-track implementation process

Intervention Type OTHER

Undergo fast-track implementation process (WHO-HPH recognition Process), including: baseline data collection, quality plan, implementation for one year, follow-up data collection, revision of quality plan, external site visit and data validation

Control Group

Continue usual routine

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

fast-track implementation process

Undergo fast-track implementation process (WHO-HPH recognition Process), including: baseline data collection, quality plan, implementation for one year, follow-up data collection, revision of quality plan, external site visit and data validation

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical hospital departments from university hospitals
* Clinical hospital departments from non-university hospitals

Exclusion Criteria

* Palliative care departments
* Pediatric departments
* Nursing homes
* Non-hospital departments
* Primary care facilities
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

World Health Organization

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

International Network of Health Promoting Hospitals & Health Services (HPH)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

National HPH Network of Montreal, Canada

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

National HPH Network of the Czech Republic

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

National HPH Network of Slovenia

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

National HPH Network of Estonia

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Regional HPH Network of Taiwan

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

National HPH Network of Indonesia

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

National HPH Network of Japan

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

HPH member hospitals in Denmark

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

HPH member hospitals in Croatia

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

HPH member hospitals in Malaysia

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

HPH member hospitals in Thailand

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bispebjerg Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hanne Tonnesen

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hanne Tonnesen, MD DMSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National HPH Network of Montreal, Canada

Montreal, , Canada

Site Status

HPH Members in croatia

Zagreb, , Croatia

Site Status

National HPH Network of the Czech Republic

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

HPH Members in Denmark

Middelfart, , Denmark

Site Status

National HPH Network of the Estonia

Tallinn, , Estonia

Site Status

National HPH Network of Indonesia

Jakarta, , Indonesia

Site Status

National HPH Network of Japan

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

HPH members in Malaysia

George Town, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

Site Status

National HPH Network of Slovenia

Golnik, , Slovenia

Site Status

Regional HPH Network of Taiwan

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

HPH members in Thailand

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada Croatia Czechia Denmark Estonia Indonesia Japan Malaysia Slovenia Taiwan Thailand

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Svane JK, Chiou ST, Groene O, Kalvachova M, Brkic MZ, Fukuba I, Harm T, Farkas J, Ang Y, Andersen MO, Tonnesen H. A WHO-HPH operational program versus usual routines for implementing clinical health promotion: an RCT in health promoting hospitals (HPH). Implement Sci. 2018 Dec 22;13(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0848-0.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30577871 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

WHOHPHRP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PEN Implementation Study
NCT05880784 COMPLETED NA