Comparison of Nasal Positive End Expiratory Pressure Valve to Dental Device as an Alternative Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
NCT ID: NCT01553383
Last Updated: 2013-04-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-02-29
2013-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Blood Pressure and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome
NCT00300872
Validation of a Portable Sleep Device in Patients With Co-existing Medical Illnesses
NCT03930316
Comparison of Two Techniques of Combination Therapy for Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)
NCT04029311
Long Term Efficacy of Education Programme on Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment
NCT01428921
Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) on Systemic Blood Pressure, Coagulability and Carotid Intima-media Thickness in Patients With Sleep Apnea
NCT00300599
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dental device
"Provent" nasal peep valve vs dental device
nasal peep valve "Provent"
application of nasal peep valve vs dental device and cpap
CPAP
continuous positive airway pressure "CPAP" vs nasap peep valve "Provent"
nasal peep valve "Provent"
application of nasal peep valve vs dental device and cpap
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
nasal peep valve "Provent"
application of nasal peep valve vs dental device and cpap
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Not using CPAP for any reasons or patients on dental device but would like to try alternative treatments for OSA.
* Able to sign informed consent and use the PEEP nasal valve.
* Age between 18-65 years old.
* Willing to attend follow up.
Exclusion Criteria
* Unable to sign consent or use PEEP nasal valve.
* Significant or unstable co-morbidities requiring other forms of treatment for OSA as priority.
* Coexisting sleep disordered breathing condition other than OSA requiring more complex treatment. E.g. central sleep apnea, significant Cheyne Stokes respiration or hypoventilation syndrome.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chinese University of Hong Kong
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
To Kin Wang
Associate consultant
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, CUHK
Shatin, , Hong Kong
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CREC2012.037
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.