Evaluation of Functionnal ElectromyoStimulation on Leg In Advanced Chronic Heart Failure After Hospitalisation for Acute Decompensation
NCT ID: NCT01548508
Last Updated: 2017-05-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
46 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-07-31
2014-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Saving Life and Limb: FES for the Elderly With PAD
NCT02384980
Effects of Low-frequency Electrical Stimulation in Patients With Advanced HF
NCT01886430
Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure
NCT02313714
Isolated Resistance Training and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Patients With Femoral Intra Aortic Balloon Pump.
NCT06316349
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Chronic Heart Failure Patient
NCT03728075
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In litterature, Functionnal Electrostimulation (FES) has been tested in stable Chronic Heart Failure (NYHA I to III), far from decompensation. Several authors showed the same improvements than those obtained with conventionnal rehabilitation on aerobic capacities (peak VO2, 6 minutes walking test) and quality of life.
The originality of this study is to test FES soon after acute heart decompensation in ACHF patients. This type of rehabilitation could represent in the future an alternative to conventionnal rehabilitation until the patients could be able to do aerobic exercise.
60 patients will be randomised between two groups, the firsth receiving FES (treatment group), the second receiving skin electrostimulation in the same place without muscular contraction (Sham group). Patient and evaluator do not know what type of stimulation they have. These treatments spread over six weeks, five days per seven. They are began in rehabilitation unit then continued at home.
The principal criteria of judgement of FES efficacy is peak VO2 after the protocol. Secondary criteria are distance to the six minutes walking test, muscular strengh of quadriceps, the muscle mass measured by Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), inflamatory dosage (TNF alpha, IL-1, IL-6, CRP), rest value of Muscle sympathetic nerve activity, score to Minnesota questionnaire and fuctionnal independance.
The attempted results are an significative improvement of aerobic capacity(peak VO2 and six minutes walking test) and the others secondary criteria in FES group compared with Sham group.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Functionnal ElectroStimulation (FES)
Functionnal ElectroStimulation (FES)
Functionnal ElectroStimulation on lower limbs, 1h per day, 5 days per 7, during 6 weeks
SHAM
SHAM
SHAM on lower limbs, 1h per day, 5 days per 7, during 6 weeks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Functionnal ElectroStimulation (FES)
Functionnal ElectroStimulation on lower limbs, 1h per day, 5 days per 7, during 6 weeks
SHAM
SHAM on lower limbs, 1h per day, 5 days per 7, during 6 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Cardiac Ejection Fraction \< 40 %
* peak VO2 \< 16 ml/kg/min,
* optimal drug treatment of CHF,
* hospitalised for acute decompensation but not in intensive care
Exclusion Criteria
* History of stroke with walking disability, dementia.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Foundation for the Future, Paris, France
UNKNOWN
University Hospital, Toulouse
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michel GALINIER, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Toulouse
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universty Hospital Toulouse Cardiology
Toulouse, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Labrunee M, Despas F, Marque P, Guiraud T, Galinier M, Senard JM, Pathak A. Acute electromyostimulation decreases muscle sympathetic nerve activity in patients with advanced chronic heart failure (EMSICA Study). PLoS One. 2013 Nov 12;8(11):e79438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079438. eCollection 2013.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2008-A00330-55
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
0730502
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.