A Study To Evaluate PF-04449913 With Chemotherapy In Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT01546038

Last Updated: 2020-03-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

255 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-06-27

Study Completion Date

2019-03-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a study to evaluate PF-04449913 (an inhibitor of the Hedgehog pathway) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and high-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome in combination with standard agents used to treat these diseases.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm A (Phase 1B)

PF-04449913 in combination with low dose ARA-C (LDAC)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PF-04449913

Intervention Type DRUG

PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28-days.

Low dose ARA-C (LDAC)

Intervention Type DRUG

Low dose ARA-C (LDAC) administered at 20 mg SQ, BID on Days 1 through 10.

Arm B (Phase 1B)

PF-04449913 in combination with Decitabine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PF-04449913

Intervention Type DRUG

PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28 days.

Decitabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Decitabine given at 20 mg/m2 over 1 hour infusion for 5-days

Arm C (Phase 1B)

PF-04449913 in combination with intensive chemotherapy: PF-04449913 administered continuously for 28 days. Daunorubicin given using 60 mg/m2 for 3-days together with cytarabine 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 7 followed by cytarabine 1g/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5 during 2-4 cycles of consolidation therapy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PF-04449913

Intervention Type DRUG

PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28 days

Daunorubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

Daunorubicin given using 60 mg/m2 for 3-days

Cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Cytarabine 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 7

P2 Fit (Phase 2 Single Arm)

PF-04449913 in combination with intensive chemotherapy: PF-04449913 administered continuously for 28 days. Daunorubicin given using 60 mg/m2 for 3-days together with cytarabine 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 7 followed by cytarabine 1g/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5 during 2-4 cycles of consolidation therapy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PF-04449913

Intervention Type DRUG

PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28 days

Daunorubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

Daunorubicin given using 60 mg/m2 for 3-days

Cytarabine

Intervention Type DRUG

Cytarabine 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 7

P2 Unfit (Phase 2 Randomized)

Patients will be randomized 2:1 (low dose ARA-C in combination with PF-04449913: low dose ARA-C alone).

Group Type OTHER

PF-04449913

Intervention Type DRUG

PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28 days (if randomized to receive PF-04449913)

Low dose ARA-C (LDAC)

Intervention Type DRUG

Low dose ARA-C (LDAC) administered at 20 mg SQ, BID on Days 1 through 10.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PF-04449913

PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28-days.

Intervention Type DRUG

Low dose ARA-C (LDAC)

Low dose ARA-C (LDAC) administered at 20 mg SQ, BID on Days 1 through 10.

Intervention Type DRUG

PF-04449913

PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28 days.

Intervention Type DRUG

Decitabine

Decitabine given at 20 mg/m2 over 1 hour infusion for 5-days

Intervention Type DRUG

PF-04449913

PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Daunorubicin

Daunorubicin given using 60 mg/m2 for 3-days

Intervention Type DRUG

Cytarabine

Cytarabine 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 7

Intervention Type DRUG

PF-04449913

PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Daunorubicin

Daunorubicin given using 60 mg/m2 for 3-days

Intervention Type DRUG

Cytarabine

Cytarabine 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 7

Intervention Type DRUG

PF-04449913

PF-04449913 administered orally and continuously for 28 days (if randomized to receive PF-04449913)

Intervention Type DRUG

Low dose ARA-C (LDAC)

Low dose ARA-C (LDAC) administered at 20 mg SQ, BID on Days 1 through 10.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with AML or RAEB 2 High Risk MDS who are newly diagnosed according to the WHO 2008 Classification and previously untreated.
* Patients with AML (arising from an antecedent hematologic disease \[AHD\]) or MDS who may have had one prior regimen with commercially available agents for the treatment of their prior hematologic disease. The patients may not have had a prior therapy for their AML.
* AML patients include de novo AML, AML evolving from MDS or other AHD and AML after previous cytotoxic therapy or radiation (secondary AML)
* For a diagnosis of AML, a bone marrow blast count of 20% or more is required.
* For a diagnosis of high-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome RAEB 2 the patient must have 10-19% bone marrow blasts
* Adequate Organ Function
* ECOG Performance Status 0, 1, or 2

Exclusion Criteria

* AML M3 Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL) or patients with a t(9:22) cytogenetic translocation.
* Patients with known active uncontrolled central nervous system (CNS) leukemia.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pfizer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Pfizer

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center - Investigational Drug Services

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

UC San Diego Medical Center - La Jolla

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Keck Hospital of USC

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

LAC & USC Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center / Investigational Drug Services

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center Drug Information Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

UCLA Drug lnformation/lnvestigational Drugs

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

UCLA Hematology/Oncology Clinic

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

UC San Diego Medical Center - Hillcrest

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

University of Colorado Denver

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

University of Colorado Hospital

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

H.Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Emory University Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Investigational Drug Service, Emory University Clinic

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

The Emory Clinic

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Northwestern Medicine Developmental Therapeutics Institute

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

The University of Chicago Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

The University of Chicago's Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Kansas Clinical Research Center

Fairway, Kansas, United States

Site Status

University of Kansas Hospital

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

University of Kansas Cancer Center and Medical Pavilion

Westwood, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Tufts Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI)

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center Clinical Trials Office

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan Health System

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Siteman Cancer Center - West County

Creve Coeur, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Barnes Jewish Hospital North Campus

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Barnes-Jewish Hospital

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Washington University School of Medicine - Division of Bone Marrow Transplant & Leukemia

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Washington University School of Medicine, Siteman Cancer Center

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Hackensack University Medical Center

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack University Medical Center

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic Cancer Institute

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Centennial Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Sarah Cannon Research Institute

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Tennessee Oncology, PLLC

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Washington-Seattle Cancer Care Alliance

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

University of Washington Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Juravinski Cancer Centre @ Hamilton Health Sciences

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Centre de Sante et de Services Sociaux (CSSS) Champlain - Charles-Le Moyne

Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Universitaetsklinikum Ulm

Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Johann Wolfgang Goethe University

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Medizinische Hochschule Hannover

Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Charite -Universitatsmedizin Berlin - Campus Benjamin Franklin

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Universitaetsklinikum Magdeburg A.oe.R.

Magdeburg, , Germany

Site Status

Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

Universitaetsklinikum Muenster

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Universitaetsklinikum Ulm

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi

Bologna, Province of Bologna, Italy

Site Status

ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Policlinico Universitario "Umberto I" Universita degli Studi "La Sapienza" Sezione di Ematologia

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

A.O. Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino - S.C. Ematologia

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine

Udine, , Italy

Site Status

Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne Gdanskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego

Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Oddzial Hematologii Z pododzialem chemioterapii-Klinika Hematologii Wojewodzkie Wielospecjalistyczne

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Dolnoslaskie Centrum Transplantacji Komorkowych z Krajowym Bankiem Dawcow Szpiku

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio

Seville, Andalusia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol

Badalona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital del Mar

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clinic de Barcelona

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Ramon y Cajal

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada Germany Italy Poland Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Heuser M, Smith BD, Fiedler W, Sekeres MA, Montesinos P, Leber B, Merchant A, Papayannidis C, Perez-Simon JA, Hoang CJ, O'Brien T, Ma WW, Zeremski M, O'Connell A, Chan G, Cortes JE. Clinical benefit of glasdegib plus low-dose cytarabine in patients with de novo and secondary acute myeloid leukemia: long-term analysis of a phase II randomized trial. Ann Hematol. 2021 May;100(5):1181-1194. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04465-4. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33740113 (View on PubMed)

Lin S, Shaik N, Chan G, Cortes JE, Ruiz-Garcia A. An evaluation of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia and the relationship with glasdegib treatment and exposure. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2020 Oct;86(4):451-459. doi: 10.1007/s00280-020-04132-x. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32885274 (View on PubMed)

Cortes JE, Heidel FH, Fiedler W, Smith BD, Robak T, Montesinos P, Candoni A, Leber B, Sekeres MA, Pollyea DA, Ferdinand R, Ma WW, O'Brien T, O'Connell A, Chan G, Heuser M. Survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2020 Jul 14;13(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00929-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32664995 (View on PubMed)

Cortes JE, Heidel FH, Hellmann A, Fiedler W, Smith BD, Robak T, Montesinos P, Pollyea DA, DesJardins P, Ottmann O, Ma WW, Shaik MN, Laird AD, Zeremski M, O'Connell A, Chan G, Heuser M. Randomized comparison of low dose cytarabine with or without glasdegib in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia. 2019 Feb;33(2):379-389. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0312-9. Epub 2018 Dec 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30555165 (View on PubMed)

Cortes JE, Douglas Smith B, Wang ES, Merchant A, Oehler VG, Arellano M, DeAngelo DJ, Pollyea DA, Sekeres MA, Robak T, Ma WW, Zeremski M, Naveed Shaik M, Douglas Laird A, O'Connell A, Chan G, Schroeder MA. Glasdegib in combination with cytarabine and daunorubicin in patients with AML or high-risk MDS: Phase 2 study results. Am J Hematol. 2018 Nov;93(11):1301-1310. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25238. Epub 2018 Sep 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30074259 (View on PubMed)

Savona MR, Pollyea DA, Stock W, Oehler VG, Schroeder MA, Lancet J, McCloskey J, Kantarjian HM, Ma WW, Shaik MN, Laird AD, Zeremski M, O'Connell A, Chan G, Cortes JE. Phase Ib Study of Glasdegib, a Hedgehog Pathway Inhibitor, in Combination with Standard Chemotherapy in Patients with AML or High-Risk MDS. Clin Cancer Res. 2018 May 15;24(10):2294-2303. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2824. Epub 2018 Feb 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29463550 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012-000684-24

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

B1371003

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.