Trial of Decitabine in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

NCT ID: NCT00260832

Last Updated: 2019-09-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

485 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-11-30

Study Completion Date

2010-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the results in older patients who have newly diagnosed or secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and who are to either receive decitabine or patient's choice with the physician's advice of either cytarabine or supportive care medication.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

Subject's choice of treatment with physician's advice. Subjects preselected their preference of supportive care (including IV fluids, nutrition, and antibiotics) or cytarabine. (These represent one intervention.)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cytarabine or Supportive Care

Intervention Type DRUG

Patient's choice with physician's advice of either supportive care (IV fluids, nutrition, and antibiotics as needed) or cytarabine 20 mg/m\^2 subcutaneously once daily for the first 10 consecutive days of each 28 day cycle, until progression or unacceptable toxicity develops. (These represent one intervention.)

B

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dacogen (decitabine) only

Intervention Type DRUG

20mg/m\^2, 1 hour intravenous (IV) for 5 consecutive days of each 28 day cycle. Cycles continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity develops.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cytarabine or Supportive Care

Patient's choice with physician's advice of either supportive care (IV fluids, nutrition, and antibiotics as needed) or cytarabine 20 mg/m\^2 subcutaneously once daily for the first 10 consecutive days of each 28 day cycle, until progression or unacceptable toxicity develops. (These represent one intervention.)

Intervention Type DRUG

Dacogen (decitabine) only

20mg/m\^2, 1 hour intravenous (IV) for 5 consecutive days of each 28 day cycle. Cycles continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity develops.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

decitabine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Must have diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.
2. Must have a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks.
3. Must sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Must not have acute promyelocytic leukemia (M3 classification)
2. Must not have any other active systemic malignancies.
3. Must not have inaspirable bone marrow.
4. Must not have received previous chemotherapy (except hydroxyurea) for any myeloid disorder.
5. Must not have chronic respiratory disease that requires continuous oxygen use.
6. Must not have received any experimental drug within 4 weeks before randomization.
7. Must not be a candidate for a bone marrow or stem cell transplant within 12 weeks after randomization.
8. Must not have known HIV.
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eisai Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eisai Medical Services

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Eisai Global Clinical Development

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lakeland, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orange Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Highland Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Terre Haute, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Sioux City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Grosse Pointe Woods, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Neptune City, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Valhalla, New York, United States

Site Status

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Galveston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

Eau Claire, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Glendale, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Rijeka, , Croatia

Site Status

Zagreb, , Croatia

Site Status

Zalaegerszeg, , Croatia

Site Status

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

České Budějovice, , Czechia

Site Status

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Bobigny, , France

Site Status

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Lille, , France

Site Status

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Győr, , Hungary

Site Status

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Szombathely, , Hungary

Site Status

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Târgu Mureş, , Romania

Site Status

Arkhangelsk, , Russia

Site Status

Astrakhan, , Russia

Site Status

Barnaul, , Russia

Site Status

Izhevsk, , Russia

Site Status

Kirov, , Russia

Site Status

Kransnodar, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Petrozavodsk, , Russia

Site Status

Ryazan, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Samara, , Russia

Site Status

Saratov, , Russia

Site Status

Tyumen, , Russia

Site Status

Volgograd, , Russia

Site Status

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Niš, , Serbia

Site Status

Novi Sad, , Serbia

Site Status

Badalona-Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Girona, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Palma de Mallorca, , Spain

Site Status

Pamplona, , Spain

Site Status

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Changhua, , Taiwan

Site Status

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Tainan City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Sutton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Canada Croatia Czechia France Hungary Mexico Poland Romania Russia Serbia Spain Taiwan United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mayer J, Arthur C, Delaunay J, Mazur G, Thomas XG, Wierzbowska A, Ravandi F, Berrak E, Jones M, Li Y, Kantarjian HM. Multivariate and subgroup analyses of a randomized, multinational, phase 3 trial of decitabine vs treatment choice of supportive care or cytarabine in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia and poor- or intermediate-risk cytogenetics. BMC Cancer. 2014 Feb 6;14:69. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-69.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24498872 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DACO-016

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Efficacy of Decitabine in Clearance of MRD
NCT03021395 WITHDRAWN PHASE1/PHASE2