An Efficacy and Safety Study of Decitabine (DACOGEN) Plus Talacotuzumab (JNJ-56022473; Anti CD123) Versus Decitabine (DACOGEN) Alone in Participants With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy

NCT ID: NCT02472145

Last Updated: 2019-03-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

326 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-08-04

Study Completion Date

2018-01-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of study Part A is to assess the safety of talacotuzumab (formerly CSL362) monotherapy and confirm the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) in participants with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for whom experimental therapy is appropriate. The primary objective of study Part B are to assess complete response (CR) rate and overall survival (OS) in participants with AML who are not eligible for intense induction chemotherapy and who are randomly assigned to receive decitabine plus talacotuzumab at the RP2D or decitabine alone.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a 2-part, open-label, multicenter, Phase 2/3 study conducted in participants with AML who are suitable for experimental therapy (Part A) and in participants with untreated AML who are not eligible for intense induction chemotherapy or hematopoeitic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) (Part B). In Study Part A, the safety, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profile will be assessed to confirm the RP2D of 9 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) talacotuzumab. In Study Part B, participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio into either decitabine + talacotuzumab (arm 1) or decitabine alone (arm 2). Blood and bone marrow sampling will be done in Part A and B for disease assessment, PK, PD, and biomarkers will be collected in all participants. Safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Decitabine plus Talacotuzumab

Part A: For Cycle 1 of Part A, participants will receive talacotuzumab on Day 1. Starting from Cycle 2 of Part A, participants may receive decitabine on Day 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, and talacotuzumab on Day 8 and 22 of a 28-day cycle.

Part B Arm 1: Participants will receive decitabine on Day 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, and talacotuzumab on Day 8 and 22 of a 28-day cycle.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Decitabine 20 mg/m^2

Intervention Type DRUG

Decitabine 20 milligram per square meter (mg/\[m\^2\]) from Day 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of a 28-day cycle.

Talacotuzumab 9 mg/kg

Intervention Type DRUG

Talacotuzumab 9 milligram per kilogram mg/kg on Day 8 and 22 of a 28-day cycle.

Decitabine

Participants in Part B Arm 2 will receive decitabine on Day 1,2, 3, 4 and 5 of a 28-day cycle.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Decitabine 20 mg/m^2

Intervention Type DRUG

Decitabine 20 milligram per square meter (mg/\[m\^2\]) from Day 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of a 28-day cycle.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Decitabine 20 mg/m^2

Decitabine 20 milligram per square meter (mg/\[m\^2\]) from Day 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of a 28-day cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

Talacotuzumab 9 mg/kg

Talacotuzumab 9 milligram per kilogram mg/kg on Day 8 and 22 of a 28-day cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

DACOGEN CSL362

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* De novo or secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (post myelodysplastic syndrome \[MDS\] or myeloproliferative neoplasm \[MPN\] or after leukemogenic chemotherapy) according to WHO 2008 criteria

For Part A:

\- Participants With AML: treatment naive or relapsed for whom experimental therapy is appropriate (as assessed by their treating physician)

For Part B:

* Greater than or equal to (\>=) 75 years of age or \>= 65 up to 75 years of age and have at least one of the following: congestive heart failure or ejection fraction less than or equal to (\<=) 50 percent; creatinine greater than (\>) 2 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL); dialysis or prior renal transplant; documented pulmonary disease with lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) \<= 65 percent of expected, or forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) \<= 65 percent of expected or dyspnea at rest requiring oxygen; eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status of 2; prior or current malignancy that does not require concurrent treatment; unresolved infection; comorbidity that, in the Investigator's opinion, makes the participant unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy and must be documented and approved by the Sponsor before randomization
* Previously untreated AML (except: emergency leukopheresis and/or hydroxyurea during the screening phase to control hyperleukocytosis but must be discontinued at least one day prior to start of study therapy)
* Not eligible for an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
* ECOG Performance Status score of 0, 1 or 2
* A woman must be either: Not of childbearing potential: postmenopausal (more than \[\>\] 45 years of age with amenorrhea for at least 12 months; If, of childbearing potential must be practicing a highly effective method of birth control
* A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative serum (beta-human chorionic gonadotropin \[beta-hCG\]) or urine pregnancy test at screening
* A man who is sexually active with a woman of childbearing potential and has not had a vasectomy must agree to use a barrier method of birth control eg, either condom with spermicidal foam/gel/film/cream/suppository or partner with occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) with spermicidal foam/gel/film/cream/suppository for at least 3 months after last study treatment

Exclusion Criteria

* Acute promyelocytic leukemia with t(15;17), or its molecular equivalent (PML-RARalpha)
* For Part B only: Known leukemic involvement or clinical symptoms of leukemic involvement of the central nervous system
* Participants who received prior treatment with a hypomethylating agent
* For Part A only: Participants who did not recover from all clinically significant toxicities (excluding alopecia and hematologic toxicities) of any previous surgery, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, or chemotherapy to less than or equal to Grade 1
* Any uncontrolled active systemic infection that requires treatment with intravenous (IV) antibiotics
* A history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody positive or tests positive for HIV if tested at screening
* Active systemic hepatitis infection requiring treatment or other clinically active liver disease
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Herston, , Australia

Site Status

Melbourne, , Australia

Site Status

Perth, , Australia

Site Status

South Woodville, , Australia

Site Status

Woolloongabba, , Australia

Site Status

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Hasselt, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Mons, , Belgium

Site Status

Turnhout, , Belgium

Site Status

Wilrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt am Main, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Katowice, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Chelyabinsk, , Russia

Site Status

Dzerzhinsk, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Ryazan, , Russia

Site Status

Samara, , Russia

Site Status

Yekaterinburg, , Russia

Site Status

Busan, , South Korea

Site Status

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Hwasun Gun, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Badalona, Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Pozuelo de Alarcon, Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Örebro, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Chiayi City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Tainan City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Atakum, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Bournemouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cardiff, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Wolverhampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Belgium France Germany Israel Poland Russia South Korea Spain Sweden Taiwan Turkey (Türkiye) United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Peipert JD, Efficace F, Pierson R, Loefgren C, Cella D, He J. Patient-reported outcomes predict overall survival in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. J Geriatr Oncol. 2022 Sep;13(7):935-939. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.09.007. Epub 2021 Sep 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34521609 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

56022473AML2002

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2015-001611-12

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR107273

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Efficacy of Decitabine in Clearance of MRD
NCT03021395 WITHDRAWN PHASE1/PHASE2