Examining Adolescent Assessment, Feedback, Incentive, and Exchange (AFIX) in North Carolina

NCT ID: NCT01544764

Last Updated: 2013-12-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

91 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-04-30

Study Completion Date

2012-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The North Carolina Immunization Branch will evaluate the use of the CDC program to improve adolescent vaccination practices (called Assessment, Feedback, Incentives, and eXchanges, or AFIX). This evaluation is the first of its kind in the nation and may have a profound impact on prevention.

AFIX has four major components: 1) Assessment of a provider's current immunization practices and vaccination levels, 2) Feedback of the assessment results and strategies to improve coverage levels, 3) Incentives to improve coverage levels, and 4) eXchange of information and resources necessary to facilitate improvement.

This program will evaluate the effectiveness of AFIX visits on affecting provider practices to increase adolescent (age 11-18) immunization. Visits include discussion of that practice's immunization rates and strategies for improving rates. The investigators will compare the changes, from baseline to 5 months, in immunization for practices receiving virtual visits (webinars), in-person visits, and no visits (control group). Thirty practices will be randomly assigned to each intervention type. The main outcomes of this study are practice-wide uptake rates of several adolescent vaccines (Tdap, HPV, and MCV4) as well as pre- and post-AFIX visit surveys focusing on recall tactics utilized by each practice. Data will be collected on practices with at least 200 adolescent patients (note: there is no patient-level data collected in this study).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adolescent Health Services Immunization

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine Meningococcal Vaccines Hepatitis B Vaccines Chickenpox Vaccine Papillomavirus Vaccines

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

This arm includes 30 health centers in North Carolina with at least 200 adolescent (age 11-18) patients. Practices in this arm were randomly assigned to receive no AFIX visit.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

AFIX In-Person Visit

This arm includes 30 health centers in North Carolina with at least 200 adolescent (age 11-18) patients. These practices received an in-person AFIX visit from a North Carolina Immunization Branch employee.

Intervention:

Other: Assessment , Feedback, Incentives, and eXchange Program

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Assessment , Feedback, Incentives, and eXchange Program

Intervention Type OTHER

The NC Immunization Branch uses Adolescent AFIX (Assessment, Feedback, Incentives and eXchange) Program, a quality improvement strategy developed by the CDC to improve the immunization practices and vaccination coverage levels of public and private health care providers. It has four main components: 1) Assessment of a provider's current immunization practices and vaccination levels, 2) Feedback of the assessment results and strategies to improve coverage levels, 3) Incentives to improve coverage levels, and 4) eXchange of information and resources necessary to facilitate improvement.

AFIX Webinar Visit

This arm includes 31 health centers in North Carolina with at least 200 adolescent (age 11-18) patients. These practices received a webinar during which a North Carolina Immunization Branch employee completed the components of an AFIX visit.

Intervention:

Other: Assessment , Feedback, Incentives, and eXchange Program

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Assessment , Feedback, Incentives, and eXchange Program

Intervention Type OTHER

The NC Immunization Branch uses Adolescent AFIX (Assessment, Feedback, Incentives and eXchange) Program, a quality improvement strategy developed by the CDC to improve the immunization practices and vaccination coverage levels of public and private health care providers. It has four main components: 1) Assessment of a provider's current immunization practices and vaccination levels, 2) Feedback of the assessment results and strategies to improve coverage levels, 3) Incentives to improve coverage levels, and 4) eXchange of information and resources necessary to facilitate improvement.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Assessment , Feedback, Incentives, and eXchange Program

The NC Immunization Branch uses Adolescent AFIX (Assessment, Feedback, Incentives and eXchange) Program, a quality improvement strategy developed by the CDC to improve the immunization practices and vaccination coverage levels of public and private health care providers. It has four main components: 1) Assessment of a provider's current immunization practices and vaccination levels, 2) Feedback of the assessment results and strategies to improve coverage levels, 3) Incentives to improve coverage levels, and 4) eXchange of information and resources necessary to facilitate improvement.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Pediatric and/or family practices participating in the North Carolina Immunization Program
* A minimum of 200 active adolescent patients
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

North Carolina Division of Public Health

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amanda Dayton, MA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

DPH/WCH/Immunization

Amy Grimshaw, MS, MSW

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

DPH/WCH/Immunization

Noel T Brewer, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cervical Cancer-Free North Carolina

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

North Carolina Immunization Branch

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gilkey MB, Dayton AM, Moss JL, Sparks AC, Grimshaw AH, Bowling JM, Brewer NT. Increasing provision of adolescent vaccines in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2014 Aug;134(2):e346-53. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-4257. Epub 2014 Jul 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25002671 (View on PubMed)

Gilkey MB, Moss JL, Roberts AJ, Dayton AM, Grimshaw AH, Brewer NT. Comparing in-person and webinar delivery of an immunization quality improvement program: a process evaluation of the adolescent AFIX trial. Implement Sci. 2014 Feb 18;9:21. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24533515 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id