Evaluation of the CR Neuromodulation Treatment for Tinnitus
NCT ID: NCT01541969
Last Updated: 2016-08-22
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-08-31
2014-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Trial of Sound-Based Versus Behavioral Therapy for Tinnitus
NCT03022084
Evaluation of Treatment Methods for Clinically Significant Tinnitus
NCT00013390
Acoustic Coordinated Reset (CR®) Neuromodulation for the Treatment of Chronic Tonal Tinnitus ("RESET Real Life")
NCT01435317
Neuro-feedback Therapy for Treating Tinnitus
NCT03773926
The Effect of Tinnitus Retraining Therapy on Subjective and Objective Measures of Chronic Tinnitus
NCT00124800
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CR Neuromodulation
Adaptive NeuroModulation (ANM) T30 CR® Neurostimulator device. Participants receive the intervention according to the manufacturer/funder training given to the study team.
CR Neuromodulation
Ear level device which delivers patterned sound stimulation.
The experimental arm will use the device fitted according to audiologist training given by the manufacturer/funder. An individually specified sound stimulation algorithm is hypothesised to interrupt tinnitus generating activity in the brain. For the first 12 weeks participants will be asked to wear the device every day for 6 hours, and in blocks of time not less than 1 hour. After 12 weeks participants will be unblinded and continue with the same experimental intervention. In weeks 13-36 participants will be asked to wear the device every day for 4 hours, in continuous blocks of at least 1 hour.
Tinnitus masking
Participants will receive the same Adaptive NeuroModulation (ANM) T30 CR® Neurostimulator device, but it will NOT be programmed according to the therapeutic algorithm (0-12 weeks).
Tinnitus masking
The active comparator uses the same ear level device and also delivers patterned sound but the stimulus will be determined according to an algorithm predicted not to break up tinnitus generating activity in the brain. It may have a masking effect. For the first 12 weeks participants will be asked to wear the device every day for 6 hours, and in blocks of time not less than 1 hour. After 12 weeks, the participants will be unblinded and the device algorithm will be reprogrammed in the same way as the experimental intervention. In weeks 13-24 participants will be asked to wear the device for 6 hours per day, in continuous blocks of at least 1 hour. In weeks 25-36 they will be asked to continue using the device every day for 4 hours, in continuous blocks of at least 1 hour.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CR Neuromodulation
Ear level device which delivers patterned sound stimulation.
The experimental arm will use the device fitted according to audiologist training given by the manufacturer/funder. An individually specified sound stimulation algorithm is hypothesised to interrupt tinnitus generating activity in the brain. For the first 12 weeks participants will be asked to wear the device every day for 6 hours, and in blocks of time not less than 1 hour. After 12 weeks participants will be unblinded and continue with the same experimental intervention. In weeks 13-36 participants will be asked to wear the device every day for 4 hours, in continuous blocks of at least 1 hour.
Tinnitus masking
The active comparator uses the same ear level device and also delivers patterned sound but the stimulus will be determined according to an algorithm predicted not to break up tinnitus generating activity in the brain. It may have a masking effect. For the first 12 weeks participants will be asked to wear the device every day for 6 hours, and in blocks of time not less than 1 hour. After 12 weeks, the participants will be unblinded and the device algorithm will be reprogrammed in the same way as the experimental intervention. In weeks 13-24 participants will be asked to wear the device for 6 hours per day, in continuous blocks of at least 1 hour. In weeks 25-36 they will be asked to continue using the device every day for 4 hours, in continuous blocks of at least 1 hour.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Must be able to hear all stimulation tones presented by the device
* Chronic subjective tinnitus for more than 3 months
* Dominant tinnitus frequency measured between 0.2 and 10 kHz
* At least mild tinnitus score on the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory
* Willing to wear the device for 4-6 hours daily during the trial
* Sufficient command of English language to read, understand and complete the questionnaires
* Able and willing to give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Pulsatile tinnitus
* Intermittent tinnitus
* Severe anxiety
* Severe depression
* Catastrophic tinnitus
* Hearing-aids wearers for less than 9 months
* Hearing-aid wearers with audiological adjustments within last 3 months
* Absolute thresholds \> 70 dB on individual frequencies up to 8 kHz (unable to sufficiently hear the stimulus)
* Taking part in another trial during the last 30 days before study start
* The individually tailored training stimulus is uncomfortable or not acceptable to the participant
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Nottingham
OTHER
University College, London
OTHER
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Deborah A Hall, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, Unviersity of Nottingham
Derek J Hoare, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, University of Nottingham
David McAlpine, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University College London, Ear Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University College London Ear Institute
London, , United Kingdom
NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, University of Nottingham
Nottingham, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hoare DJ, Edmondson-Jones M, Gander PE, Hall DA. Agreement and reliability of tinnitus loudness matching and pitch likeness rating. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 5;9(12):e114553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114553. eCollection 2014.
Hoare DJ, Pierzycki RH, Thomas H, McAlpine D, Hall DA. Evaluation of the acoustic coordinated reset (CR(R)) neuromodulation therapy for tinnitus: study protocol for a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Jul 10;14:207. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-207.
Fackrell K, Hall DA, Barry JG, Hoare DJ. Psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI): Assessment in a UK research volunteer population. Hear Res. 2016 May;335:220-235. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
Pierzycki RH, McNamara AJ, Hoare DJ, Hall DA. Whole scalp resting state EEG of oscillatory brain activity shows no parametric relationship with psychoacoustic and psychosocial assessment of tinnitus: A repeated measures study. Hear Res. 2016 Jan;331:101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
Fackrell K, Hall DA, Barry JG, Hoare DJ. Response to Letter: Psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI): Assessment in a UK research volunteer population. Hear Res. 2016 May;335:237-238. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Mar 30. No abstract available.
Hall DA, Pierzycki RH, Thomas H, Greenberg D, Sereda M, Hoare DJ. Systematic Evaluation of the T30 Neurostimulator Treatment for Tinnitus: A Double-Blind Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial with Open-Label Extension. Brain Sci. 2022 Feb 26;12(3):317. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12030317.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Sponsor supported statement about study reporting
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
11IH006
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.