Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-08-31
2011-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The drugs used as recommended by the WHO does not promote pain relief for all patients with cancer pain. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of morphine as the first drug for the treatment of moderate cancer pain by visual analogue scale in patients with advanced disease and / or metastases, as an alternative to the recommendations of the WHO analgesic ladder advocated. Methods: The patients without opioid therapy with more than 18 years, were randomly divided into two groups. G1 patients received medication according to the analgesic ladder, starting treatment with non-opioid in the first step, the second weak opioid and opioid potent in the third, and G2 received morphine as first analgesic. There was evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of initial use of morphine every 2 weeks for 3 months. Results: The study was performed in 63 patients. The groups had similar demographics.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Methadone Associated With Morphine for Cancer Pain
NCT03324815
Epidural Association of Morphine and Ropivacaine for Cancer Pain Treatment
NCT05558397
Switching From Morphine to Oral Methadone Plus Acetaminophen in the Treatment of Cancer Pain
NCT00525967
Morphine for the Treatment of Pain in Patients With Breast Cancer
NCT00003000
Morphine After Radiofrequency Ablation of Painful Bone Metastases in Patients With Cancer
NCT00712712
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There were evaluated: pain intensity every 2 wk. by visual analogue scale (VAS), quality of life every 4 wk. through the brief questionnaire of quality of life of the WHO 19, satisfaction with treatment, physical capacity measured by the index of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 20, and the need for additional analgesics. Adverse effects were recorded. The study was considered completed with the patient's death or three months of follow-up.
To calculate the minimum sample size was used the program BioEstat 2.0. There were used as reference means and standard deviations values of study with a similar method 5. Considering a confidence level of 95% study power of 80% of the minimum sample of 30 patients for each group, totaling 60 patients. For the statistical analysis was used GraphPad Prism ®. There was used the Student t test for age, weight, height, chi-square test for patient satisfaction, need for complementation, and adverse effects, and Mann-Whitney test for pain intensity, quality of life and physical capacity. A p value of ≤ 0,05 was considered significant. The resultas were expressed as mean ± DP.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Morphine, Pain intensity
For cancer pain treatment, World Health Organization recomends tritation of opioids associated with non steroidal antiinflamatory drugs. This study compares the analgesic effect with diferents dosages in 63 patients with cancer pain.
Opioid
10 mg/pill, po, each 6h, during 6m
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Opioid
10 mg/pill, po, each 6h, during 6m
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* cognitive impairment and prior treatment with opioids
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Federal University of São Paulo
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rioko Kimiko Sakata
Pain Clinic Director
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rioko K Sakata, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universidade Federal de São Paulo
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo
São Paulo, , Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CEP1133/07
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.