Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
1174 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-04-16
2017-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Novel Sandwich Technique of Minimally Invasive Keratoplasty for Corneal Perforation
NCT06233409
Corneal Stroma Implantation for the Treatment of Keratoconus
NCT03229239
Clinical Study on the Treatment of Mixed Component Cornea for High Risk Keratoplasty
NCT04490902
Neovascularization Patterns in Corneal Graft Rejection
NCT01695655
In Vitro Study on Donor Corneas Preservation in IRESTORE Storage Medium. A Post Marketing Interventional Study on Device
NCT07134946
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
0-7d Preservation Time Group
Subjects in this arm will receive cornea tissue transplant with cornea tissue preserved for 0 to 7 days prior to transplant.
Cornea tissue transplant
Cornea tissue preserved 0 to 7 days
8-14d Preservation Time Group
Subjects in this arm will receive cornea tissue transplant with cornea tissue preserved for 8 to 14 days prior to transplant.
Cornea tissue transplant
Cornea tissue preserved 8 to 14 days.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cornea tissue transplant
Cornea tissue preserved 0 to 7 days
Cornea tissue transplant
Cornea tissue preserved 8 to 14 days.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Willingness to return for follow-up study visits at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years.
3. Fluent in English or Spanish.
1. Endothelial keratoplasty (EK) is scheduled between 10 and 60 days after enrollment
* The 10-day requirement relates to the need to be able to randomly assign the eye to either intervention group.
* The 60-day requirement relates to the need to have current eligibility and enrollment data at the time of surgery. If surgery is postponed to \>60 days after the initial enrollment visit, a new Baseline Visit and eligibility assessment will have to be performed.
2. Presence of a condition related to endothelial dysfunction which will be treated by EK.
* Eligible indications for EK include:
* Presence of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) meeting at least one of the following:
* Phakic FECD
* Phakic FECD with cataract
* Triple procedure including EK for FECD, cataract extraction and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation (IOL) is allowed
* Aphakic FECD
* Pseudophakic FECD with posterior capsule supported, suture-fixated, or sulcus-supported posterior chamber IOL
* Aphakic or pseudophakic corneal edema with posterior capsule supported, suture-fixated, or sulcus-supported posterior chamber IOL without FECD
Exclusion Criteria
1. Prior EK
2. Indication for surgery that is not suitable for EK (e.g, keratoconus, stromal dystrophies and scars)
3. Presence of a condition that has a very high probability for failure (e.g., failed EK or Penetrating Keratoplasty (PKP), heavily vascularized cornea, uncontrolled uveitis)
4. Other primary endothelial dysfunction conditions including posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy and congenital hereditary corneal dystrophy
5. Anterior chamber IOL in study eye prior to or anticipated during EK
6. Planned intraocular lens exchange of an anterior chamber IOL with a posterior chamber IOL in study eye at time of study EK
7. Pre-operative central sub-epithelial or stromal scarring that the investigator believes is visually significant and could impact post-operative stromal clarity assessment
8. Stromal vascularization that is visually significant (by investigator's judgment)
9. Presence of anterior synechiae (iris to cornea)
10. Peripheral anterior synechiae (iris to angle) in the angle greater than a total of three clock hours
11. Hypotony (Intraocular pressure \<10 mm Hg)
12. Uncontrolled (defined as intraocular pressure \> 25mm Hg) glaucoma with or without prior filtering surgery or shunt or mini-shunt placement.
* A shunt or mini-shunt is any device implanted to lower intraocular pressure through an external route (e.g Ahmed) or internal route (e.g. Glaukos) that is present in the anterior chamber angle or extends into the anterior chamber.
13. Controlled glaucoma with prior shunt or mini-shunt placement for glaucoma
* Note: FECD or pseudophakic/aphakic corneal edema with posterior chamber IOL that also have undergone filtering surgery (without shunt or mini-shunt) in which glaucoma is currently considered under control will be eligible
14. Fellow eye visual acuity \< 20/200 that is not correctable with EK
Eligibility Criteria for Second Study Eye
1. Study participant has already enrolled one eye
3. EK surgery in second eye is not planned within 6 weeks of EK on first study eye
30 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Eye Institute (NEI)
NIH
Jaeb Center for Health Research
OTHER
Case Western Reserve University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jonathan Lass, MD
Charles I Thomas Professor, Dept. of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences,
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jonathan Lass, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Case Western Reserve University
Allison Ayala, MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Keck Medical Center
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Jules Stein Eye Institute
Los Angeles, California, United States
Eye Care of San Diego
San Diego, California, United States
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
Miami, Florida, United States
Center for Sight
Sarasota, Florida, United States
Woolfson Eye Institute
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Eye Consultants of Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
University of Illinois Eye and Eye
Chicago, Illinois, United States
NorthShore University Health System
Glenview, Illinois, United States
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
University of Kentucky Ophthalmology
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Mid-Atlantic Cornea Consultants
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Johns Hopkins/Wilmer Eye Institute
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Eye Consultants of Maryland
Owings Mills, Maryland, United States
Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Michigan/Kellogg Eye Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Verdier Eye Center
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Michigan Cornea Consultants
Southfield, Michigan, United States
Minnesota Eye Consultants
Bloomington, Minnesota, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Mercy Medical Research Institute
Springfield, Missouri, United States
Ophthalmology Associates
St Louis, Missouri, United States
New York Eye and Ear Infirmary
New York, New York, United States
Cornea Consultants of Albany
Slingerlands, New York, United States
Cincinnati Eye Institute
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
University Hospitals Case Medical Center Eye Institute
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Ohio State Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Northeast Ohio Eye Surgeons
Kent, Ohio, United States
Medical Eye Center
Medford, Oregon, United States
Devers Eye Institute
Portland, Oregon, United States
Ophthalmic Partners of PA
Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, United States
Central Pennsylvania Eye Institute
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
Sadeer Hannush, MD
Langhorne, Pennsylvania, United States
Corneal Associates, PC, Wills Eye Institute
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Cornea Associates of Texas
Dallas, Texas, United States
Focal Point Vision
San Antonio, Texas, United States
University of Utah, Moran Eye Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Eye Associates Northwest
Seattle, Washington, United States
Dean Medical Center
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rosenwasser GO, Szczotka-Flynn LB, Ayala AR, Liang W, Aldave AJ, Dunn SP, McCall T, Navarro LC, Pramanik S, Ross KW, Stulting RD, Terry MA, Tu EY, Verdier DD, Kollman C, Gal RL, Beck RW, Lass JH; Cornea Preservation Time Study Group. Effect of Cornea Preservation Time on Success of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec 1;135(12):1401-1409. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.4989.
Lass JH, Benetz BA, Verdier DD, Szczotka-Flynn LB, Ayala AR, Liang W, Aldave AJ, Dunn SP, McCall T, Mian SI, Navarro LC, Patel SV, Pramanik S, Rosenwasser GO, Ross KW, Terry MA, Kollman C, Gal RL, Beck RW; Cornea Preservation Time Study Group. Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss 3 Years After Successful Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in the Cornea Preservation Time Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec 1;135(12):1394-1400. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.4970.
Lass JH, Bailey RJ, Szczotka-Flynn LB, Benetz BA, Soper M, Titus MS, Kollman C, Beck RW; Cornea Preservation Time Study Group. Comparison of Graft Outcomes Reusing Original Intermediate-Term Cold Storage Solution for Entire Corneal Donor Storage Period With Exchanged Fresh Storage Solution After Donor Preparation in the Cornea Preservation Time Study. Cornea. 2022 Dec 1;41(12):1539-1544. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003108. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
Lass JH, Szczotka-Flynn LB, Ayala AR, Benetz BA, Gal RL, Aldave AJ, Corrigan MM, Dunn SP, McCall TL, Pramanik S, Rosenwasser GO, Ross KW, Terry MA, Verdier DD; Writing Committee for the Cornea Preservation Time Study Group. Cornea preservation time study: methods and potential impact on the cornea donor pool in the United States. Cornea. 2015 Jun;34(6):601-8. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000417.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Public website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.