Treatment Study of Vacuum Assisted Closure for Postsurgical Subcutaneous Abdominal Wound Healing Impairments
NCT ID: NCT01528033
Last Updated: 2020-06-25
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
539 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-08-02
2018-06-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Main outcome measure is the time until complete wound closure that sustained for a minimum of 14 days. Furthermore the therapy options will be examined regarding several other clinical, safety, patient reported and economic parameters.
Patients will be assigned equally and by chance to both treatment groups. Study participants as well as the attending doctors and nurses will be informed about the assignment to the respective treatment arm.
The primary outcome measure and some of the secondary parameters like reappearance of the wound and the development of the wound size over time, examined within an active study treatment time of 42 days, will be photographed and analysed under the use of a central computer system. The central analysing personal will not be informed about patient details or therapy allocation.
Patients with at first closed belly wounds with wound healing disorder in the postoperative course after surgery without an opening of the underlying layer of fibrous tissue are eligible to be included in the trial if the diagnosis of a wound healing impairment in the postoperative course is manifested as a wound with spontaneous dehiscence, a wound that requires an active reopening of the suture by the treating physician or a wound that cannot be closed by primary intention and requires further treatment to achieve permanent closure.
Study participants will be selected and enrolled within clinical surgical departments which provide the respective personal, structural and scientific background for the conduction of the trial project.
Trial therapy will be started in-hospital and may be continued in ambulatory care. It is very important to examine the therapy options also in the ambulant care setting thus study participants with good health who are able to continue the specific wound treatment in ambulant should be transferred to the ambulant service as soon as possible.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Vacuum Assisted Wound Closure and Permanent On-lay Mesh-mediated Fascial Traction in Patients With Open Abdomen
NCT05568238
Vacuum Assisted Wound Closure (VAWC) and Mesh Mediated Fascial Traction
NCT00494793
Study to Determine the Utility of Wound Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) Compared to Conventional Saline Dressing Changes
NCT00121537
Randomized Pilot Study Comparing Two Vacuum-wound-dressings for Open Abdomen Treatment
NCT00834314
A Comparison of Incisional Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Conventional Dressings Following Abdominal Surgery
NCT02534116
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Background of the clinical trial project is the decision of the Joint Federal Committee of Germany (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschusses (G-BA)) that Vacuum assisted closure therapy is inadmissible to be a standard benefit of health insurance companies in Germany.
This decision is based on systematic review \& meta-analysis of existing trials performed by Institute for Quality and Economic Efficiency in the Healthcare System (Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG)) which showed an insufficient state of evidence regarding the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of acute and chronic wounds.
This study project compares Vacuum Assisted Closure® and standard conventional wound therapy in the treatment of acute abdominal wounds after surgery without fascial dehiscence and will be conducted in abdominal surgical hospital departments with the required structural, manpower, and scientific qualifications. Patients will be stratified according to hospital and wound size. Trial therapy will be started in-hospital and may be continued in ambulatory care.
The study is designed as a multinational, multicentre, prospective randomized controlled, adaptive design, clinical superiority trial, with blinded photographic analysis of the primary endpoint.
The primary objective is to compare the clinical, safety, and economic outcomes of V.A.C.® Therapy and SCWT in postsurgical abdominal wound healing impairments without fascial dehiscence.
The primary outcome to be observed in this study is time to complete abdominal wound closure where closure is observed at or before day 42 and is confirmed to have been sustained for a period of at least 14 consecutive days. This study design also will allow detailed description of specific covariates to determine their effect on response variables (healing).
This study's hypothesis is that the use of the V.A.C.® Therapy System, when compared to SCWT in the management of post-surgical abdominal wound healing impairments with intact fascia, will result in a decrease in the time to achieve complete wound closure with confirmation after subsequent 14 days.
Using V.A.C.® Therapy is an effective and safe treatment option for hospitals as well as for outpatient care for treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wounds with wound healing impairment in the postoperative course.
Randomisation to treatment arms will be performed at a 1:1 ratio. Randomisation will be performed via a centralized system with an Internet-based tool. To address issues of blinding, wound photo documentation will be obtained during the trial and confirmation of wound closure will be assessed via blinded photographic analysis, which will serve as the method of primary endpoint analysis.
Primary closed abdominal wounds with wound healing disorder in the postoperative course after surgical intervention without fascial dehiscence are eligible to be included in the trial if the diagnosis of a wound healing impairment in the postoperative course is manifested as a wound with spontaneous dehiscence, a wound that requires an active reopening of the suture by the treating physician or a wound that cannot be closed by primary intention and requires further treatment to achieve permanent closure.
During active recruitment phase, the pre-trial estimates indicate approximately 600 patients will be required to yield the target of 552 evaluable participants. Using an adaptive design study sample-size calculations will be re-estimated upon planed interim analysis of study data of 250 patients. Patients will be enrolled from approximately 25 centres in Germany, the United Kingdom, Belgium and the Netherlands.
The evaluation of the primary Endpoint defined as time (number of days) to achieve complete wound closure verified by photo documentation and blinded, computer-based wound quality assessment as well as wound closure confirmation after 14 consecutive days and secondary endpoints including clinical endpoints like recurrences, safety endpoints, patient reported outcome parameters and economic-based outcome measures will provide data regarding efficacy and efficiency of NPWT therapy for the treatment of acute post-surgical abdominal wound healing impairment in hospital as well as in the ambulant setting.
The results of the study will be provided to make a contribution to the final decision of the Joint Federal Committee about NPWT to be a standard benefit of health insurance companies in Germany for inpatient and / or outpatient care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Vacuum Assisted Closure®
Negative pressure wound therapy
Vacuum Assisted Closure®
Vacuum Assisted Closure® (V.A.C.®) Therapy within a maximum study treatment time of 42 days.
VAC® Therapy Systems used within the trial are ActiV.A.C.®, InfoV.A.C.®, V.A.C. Freedom®, V.A.C. Via® and VAC Ulta®. All used systems are equally eligible for the treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wounds and should be used according to availability and local preferences within the trial site.
Systems differ regarding user surface and display and processing of data. For the treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wounds the V.A.C.® Granufoam Dressing (size medium and big) is recommended.
Standard conventional wound therapy
According to institutional clinical standards
Standard conventional wound therapy
Standard conventional wound therapy (SCWT) according to institutional clinical standards within a maximum study treatment time of 42 days
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vacuum Assisted Closure®
Vacuum Assisted Closure® (V.A.C.®) Therapy within a maximum study treatment time of 42 days.
VAC® Therapy Systems used within the trial are ActiV.A.C.®, InfoV.A.C.®, V.A.C. Freedom®, V.A.C. Via® and VAC Ulta®. All used systems are equally eligible for the treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wounds and should be used according to availability and local preferences within the trial site.
Systems differ regarding user surface and display and processing of data. For the treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wounds the V.A.C.® Granufoam Dressing (size medium and big) is recommended.
Standard conventional wound therapy
Standard conventional wound therapy (SCWT) according to institutional clinical standards within a maximum study treatment time of 42 days
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Post-surgical subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment
* Minimum wound size eligible for the application of the randomized treatment- Inclusion, randomization, adequate wound pre-treatment (Debridement) and start of therapy within 48 hours after reopening of the wound, diagnosis for nonclosable wound or in case of spontaneous wound dehiscence
Exclusion Criteria
* Noncompliance with study procedures, visit schedule and follow up
* Pregnancy
* Present or nonclosable defect of the abdominal fascia
* Any pre-existing or ongoing organ system failure, that cannot be stabilized or solved by appropriate medical treatment
* Necrotic tissue with eschar present
* Non-enteric and unexplored fistulas
* Malignancy of the wound
* Use of any other device based on the principle of negative pressure wound therapy on the study wound within ≤ 8 days prior to screening
* Competing therapies or procedures
* Simultaneous participation in other clinical trials
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
KCI Europe Holding B.V.
INDUSTRY
University of Witten/Herdecke
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Doerthe Seidel
Interim Scientific Leader of the Centre for Clinical Trials and Innovation
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Doerthe Seidel
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Witten / Herdecke University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UZ Brussel
Brussels, , Belgium
Department of Abdominal Surgery Gasthuisberg University Hospital
Leuven, , Belgium
Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg (Berlin)
Berlin, , Germany
Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie
Berlin, , Germany
St. Josef-Hospital gGmbH Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Bochum, , Germany
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
Göttingen, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Klinik für Allgemeine Chirurgie, Viszeral-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie
Homburg, , Germany
UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität
Mainz, , Germany
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg Chirurgische Klinik
Mannheim, , Germany
Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar
München, , Germany
Ruppiner Kliniken GmbH
Neuruppin, , Germany
Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, Klinik für Allgemein- und Visceralchirurgie
Potsdam, , Germany
Diakoniekrankenhaus Rotenburg
Rotenburg (Wümme), , Germany
Thüringen-Kliniken "Georgius Agricola" GmbH
Saalfeld, , Germany
GRN-Klinik Sinsheim, Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie
Sinsheim, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Seidel D, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA. Treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment after surgery without fascial dehiscence by vacuum assisted closure (SAWHI-V.A.C.(R)-study) versus standard conventional wound therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Nov 20;14:394. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-394.
Seidel D, Diedrich S, Herrle F, Thielemann H, Marusch F, Schirren R, Talaulicar R, Gehrig T, Lehwald-Tywuschik N, Glanemann M, Bunse J, Huttemann M, Braumann C, Heizmann O, Miserez M, Kronert T, Gretschel S, Lefering R. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Conventional Wound Treatment in Subcutaneous Abdominal Wound Healing Impairment: The SAWHI Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2020 Jun 1;155(6):469-478. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0414.
Seidel D; SAWHI study group. Ambulatory negative pressure wound therapy of subcutaneous abdominal wounds after surgery: results of the SAWHI randomized clinical trial. BMC Surg. 2022 Dec 12;22(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01863-x.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Sponsor
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
00000648
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
VAC2010-56
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.