Advantage of Using Intraoperative Visual Evoked Potentials to Preserve Visual Function During Surgical Procedures Near the Optical Pathways
NCT ID: NCT01517789
Last Updated: 2015-03-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-01-31
2014-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In a preliminary work based on analysis of these publications, we defined technical, anaesthetic and analytical parameters in order to optimise intraoperative visual evoked potentials monitoring. These parameters are special devices used for transpalpebral stimulation, complete intravenous anaesthesia without halogen or nitrous oxide, and pertinent analysis criteria of visual evoked potential (VEP). We suppose that these improvements will increase reliability of intraoperative VEP.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Multifocal ERG and Visual Field Changes After Vitrectomy and ILM Peeling
NCT04281173
The Role of Intravitreal Glucose in Macular Thinning Following Surgery for Retinal Detachment or Epimacular Membrane
NCT02210481
Vitrectomy for Optic Disc Pit Maculopathy
NCT01340703
Preoperative and Intraoperative Factors Related to the Development of Ptosis After Retinal Surgery
NCT01752478
Determine the Effect of Intraocular Pressure (IOP), Optic Nerve Imaging, Venous Congestion in Volunteers Prone Position 5 Hours
NCT00875043
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this study, we assess the predictive value of relevant intraoperative variations of VEP (more than 50% variation of latency and amplitude) on the visual prognosis at six months after surgery The visual assessment consisting of a visual field, a visual acuity, and the performance of pattern transient VEP, will be performed by an ophthalmologist before surgery, and at three and six months after surgery. An electroencephalogram with photostimulatory lighting will be used in pre-operative and will validate the absence of photo-induced epilepsy risk.
During the intervention, VEPs associated to an electroretinogram will be performed by a neurosurgeon trained to the use of these tools by Metrovision company:
* Under general anaesthesia, but before any surgery.
* During the surgery, at predetermined surgical times (while performing the craniotomy or the sphenoid opening, at various times during the perioptic lesion dissection, after the lesion resection, when closing).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients
Visual evoked potentials monitoring during neurosurgery - Vision monitor MonOpera®
Visual assessment (visual field, visual acuity, pattern visual evoked potential) are realised before and after surgery.
Flash and steady state visual evoked potential are measured during the surgical procedure at different times.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Visual evoked potentials monitoring during neurosurgery - Vision monitor MonOpera®
Visual assessment (visual field, visual acuity, pattern visual evoked potential) are realised before and after surgery.
Flash and steady state visual evoked potential are measured during the surgical procedure at different times.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
13 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Bordeaux
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Daniel LAGUERRE, Dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
Paul PEREZ, Dr
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Bordeaux - hôpital Pellegrin
Bordeaux, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CHUBX 2011/09
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.