The Effects of Pre-transplant Dialysis Modality on Post-transplant Events
NCT ID: NCT01513707
Last Updated: 2017-04-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
1040 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2011-12-22
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Subjects will be enrolled consecutively until the number of subjects in peritoneal dialysis group has been 260. It will take 2 years. In this period, the number of subject in hemodialysis group enrolled in this study will be 780. After finishing the observation of all subjects, to balance clinical and demographic baseline characteristics between the two groups, subjects will be selected in each cohort with 1:1 matched using propensity score method. And then primary and secondary endpoints will be compared between two groups.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of Preemptive Living Donor Renal Transplantation on Quality of Life , Occupational Rehabilitation and Societal Participation of Transplant Recipients
NCT02893475
The Effect of Remote Postconditioning on Graft Function in Patients Undergoing Living-related Kidney Transplantation
NCT01363687
Molecular Biological and Moleculargenetic Monitoring of Therapy After Kidney Transplantation
NCT01515605
Treatment of Chronic Active Antibody Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation by Double-Filtration PlasmaPheresis or Plasma Exchange
NCT03436134
Multimorbidity and Cardiovascular Risk Factors After Renal Transplant
NCT07205692
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary objective of this study is:
• To compare the incidence of composite outcomes (delayed graft function, functional delayed graft function, primary nonfunction, biopsy-proven acute rejection) of pre-transplant dialysis modality hemodialysis versus peritoneal in recipients of first renal allografts at 1 year posttransplant.
The secondary objectives of this study are:
* To compare the incidence of delayed graft function and functional delayed graft function of pre-transplant dialysis modality hemodialysis versus peritoneal in recipients of first renal allografts at 1 year posttransplant;
* To compare the incidence of composite outcomes biopsy-proven acute rejection of pre-transplant dialysis modality hemodialysis versus peritoneal in recipients of first renal allografts at 1 year posttransplant;
* To compare the incidence of primary nonfunction of pre-transplant dialysis modality hemodialysis versus peritoneal in recipients of first renal allografts at 1 year posttransplant;
* To evaluate the effect of hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis on graft function in terms of longitudinal change of eGFR calculated with abbreviated MDRD equation at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 48 after renal transplant;
* To compare the incidence and the duration of hospitalization after kidney transplantation of pre-transplant dialysis modality hemodialysis versus peritoneal in recipients of first renal allografts at 1 year posttransplant;
* To compare the graft loss and subject death rate of pre-transplant dialysis modality hemodialysis versus peritoneal in recipients of first renal allografts at 1 year posttransplant.
1.2. Endpoints
Primary endpoint:
* Composite outcome including;
1. Delayed graft function (defined as the need for dialysis in the first week after transplantation)
2. Functional DGF (defined as the absence of a decrease in serum creatinine level by a minimum of 10% per day during 3 consecutive days in the first postoperative week, not including patients in whom acute rejection, calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, or both, developed within the first week
3. Primary nonfunction (defined as the kidney never achieving function after transplantation)
4. Biopsy proven acute rejection (defined as scute rejection, confirmed by allograft biopsy)
Secondary endpoints:
* eGFR (calculated with abbreviated MDRD equation at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 after renal transplant)
* Hospitalization after kidney transplant (any cause, duration)
* Delayed graft function, functional DGF, Primary nonfunction, biopsy proven acute rejection (definition of each endpoint is described above)
* Graft loss (return to long-term dialysis)
* Subject death (any cause)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hemodialysis group
Hemodialysis group
No interventions assigned to this group
peritoneal dialysis group
peritoneal dialysis group
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Between the ages of 20 and 70 years, inclusive.
3. Either female or male adults
4. Subjects must be willing and able to provide written personal information consent with evidence of a personally signed and dated personal information consent document indicating that the subject (or a legally acceptable representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Subjects who are recipients for multiple organ transplant.
3. Subjects scheduled for non-heart beating donor transplantation.
4. Subjects scheduled for transplantation using desensitization (plasmapheresis + Rituximab) process.
5. Subjects with evidence of active infection.
6. Women of childbearing potential who are either pregnant, lactating, planning to become pregnant in the next 12 months. Women of childbearing potential must be willing to agree to contraceptive practices.
20 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
INDUSTRY
Ha Young Oh
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ha Young Oh
professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hayoung Oh
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
South Korea Samsung Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011-12-005
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.