Treatment of Chronic Active Antibody Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation by Double-Filtration PlasmaPheresis or Plasma Exchange
NCT ID: NCT03436134
Last Updated: 2020-03-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
16 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-07-01
2021-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In terms of patient survival and quality of life and also economic reasons, the goal in France is to increase renal transplantation instead of patients on dialysis.
After renal transplant, two main causes of the graft loss after the first years are death of patient with functioning graft, and chronic AntiBody Mediated Rejection (ABMR).
Double Filtration PlasmaPheresis (DFPP) has never been evaluated for this indication.
DFPP makes it possible to treat larger volumes of plasma than plasma exchange, and essentially eliminates higher molecular weights molecules including immunoglobulins comprising DSA (donor-specific alloantibody) but also the C1q involved in the lesions of(ABMR). It is postulated that it will be more effective in treating ABMR than usual plasma exchanges.
A chronic ABMR is the result of the appearance de novo production of anti-Human Leucocyte Antigen antibodies (HLA) against one or more graft antigens (DSA: donor-specific alloantibody).These DSAs will lead to accelerated arteriosclerosis in the graft vessels, which will result in rapidly progressive renal failure, usually associated with a high rate of proteinuria.
Numerous studies have shown that up to 20% of renal transplant patients develop DSA within 5 years of renal transplantation.
Today, no treatment has been shown to be effective in the case of chronic ABMR: the basis of treatment is the reduction/elimination of DSA ( by apheresis for example) and the prevention of its re-synthesis B lymphocytes/plasma cells of the patient (with rituximab for example).
The investigators of this study propose in the context of the active ABMR demonstrated by renal biopsy to evaluate in combination with rituximab, a new apheresis technique double Plasma filtration (DFPP) instead of plasma Exchange.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Kidney Transplant Outcome and Organ Acceptance Practice Pattern: A Nationwide Analyses in the US and France
NCT03723668
Peripheral and Intrarenal B Cell Study in Antibody Mediated Transplant Rejection : Phenotypic and Transcriptional Study, Study of Reactivity
NCT07134491
Use of Predigraft in Kidney Transplant Patients
NCT04969757
Endothelial Microparticules and Antibody Mediated Rejection and Kidney Transplantation: Biomarker of Antibody-mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation
NCT03098238
Identification of Risk Factors Associated With Neoplastic Complications After Renal Transplantation in Nord-Pas de Calais , Normandy and Picardy Regions
NCT02121730
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For both groups, patients will have one session per day, 4 consecutive days then three days without, then one session per day for 4 consecutive days. That's 11 days of treatment in all. The fourth and eighth sessions will be followed by an infusion of Rituximab 375 mg / m2.
At the beginning and at the end of each session, patients will have a blood test to measure the parameters and collection of study biological samples.
DFPP sessions are performed by double filtration technique. A DFPP session lasts about 2 hours for 3.5 L of processed plasma. During the session it is necessary to compensate for 20 grams of albumin.
The plasmapheresis sessions are performed by centrifugation technique. It takes about 20 minutes to prepare the apheresis monitor and circuit. A plasmapheresis session lasts approximately 1h30 for 3.5 L of plasma exchange (replacement with albumin), 2 h for an exchange where the removed plasma is replaced by fresh frozen plasma.
The blood flow rate for plasmapheresis is 80 ml / min, or 50 ml / min a plasma flow rate.
The study includes five follow-up visits following the treatment sessions. A visit 45 days after the start of apheresis sessions, a visit at 3 months and a visit every 3 months for one year.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Plasma Exchange Group
Patients receiving Exchange plasma as a treatment of chronic antibody mediated rejection.
Sessions of conventional apheresis
Patient receiving sessions of Plasma exchange as treatment of chronic antibody mediated rejection.
The plasma exchange uses a single filter to remove whole plasma and the volume is replaced with a matched volume of blood products +/- saline.) 8 sessions plasma exchange.Patients will have one session per day, 4 consecutive days and then three days without, then one session per day for 4 consecutive days. That's 11 days of treatment at all. The fourth and eighth sessions will be followed by an infusion of Rituximab 375 mg / m2.
At the beginning and at the end of each session, the patients will have a blood test to measure the parameters of the routine care and the analyzes, collection of biological samples planned for the study.
Double filtration PlasmaPheresis Group
Patients receiving double filtration plasmapheresis as a treatment of chronic antibody mediated rejection.
Sessions of news apheresis with double filtration
Patient receiving DFPP as treatment of chronic antibody mediated rejection. 8 sessions
A Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) is a variation of plasma exchange. The circuit contains two plasma filters : the first is a standard plasma filter and the second is a high molecular weight filter that primarily removes immunoglobulins. The depleted plasma is returned to the blood circuit and then to the patient.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sessions of conventional apheresis
Patient receiving sessions of Plasma exchange as treatment of chronic antibody mediated rejection.
The plasma exchange uses a single filter to remove whole plasma and the volume is replaced with a matched volume of blood products +/- saline.) 8 sessions plasma exchange.Patients will have one session per day, 4 consecutive days and then three days without, then one session per day for 4 consecutive days. That's 11 days of treatment at all. The fourth and eighth sessions will be followed by an infusion of Rituximab 375 mg / m2.
At the beginning and at the end of each session, the patients will have a blood test to measure the parameters of the routine care and the analyzes, collection of biological samples planned for the study.
Sessions of news apheresis with double filtration
Patient receiving DFPP as treatment of chronic antibody mediated rejection. 8 sessions
A Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) is a variation of plasma exchange. The circuit contains two plasma filters : the first is a standard plasma filter and the second is a high molecular weight filter that primarily removes immunoglobulins. The depleted plasma is returned to the blood circuit and then to the patient.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The presence of one or more DSAs with MFI greater than 1000
* Renal Graft dysfunction with renal biopsy of humoral rejection or chronic active antibody mediated rejection lesions based on the 2017 banff score ( with/without C4d)
* Written informed consent in patients
Exclusion Criteria
* MFI\<1000
* Hemoglobin level\<110 g/l
* No vascular access patients
* Pre terminal histological lesions of chronic ABMR
* Subject in exclusion period of another study
* Pregnant women, parturient or breastfeeding
* Subject under administrative or judicial control
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Grenoble
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lionel Rostaing, PH.MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation/ CHU GRENOBLE
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Grenoble Alpes University Hospital
La Tronche, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Eskandary F, Bond G, Kozakowski N, Regele H, Marinova L, Wahrmann M, Kikic Z, Haslacher H, Rasoul-Rockenschaub S, Kaltenecker CC, Konig F, Hidalgo LG, Oberbauer R, Halloran PF, Bohmig GA. Diagnostic Contribution of Donor-Specific Antibody Characteristics to Uncover Late Silent Antibody-Mediated Rejection-Results of a Cross-Sectional Screening Study. Transplantation. 2017 Mar;101(3):631-641. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001195.
Eskandary F, Wahrmann M, Muhlbacher J, Bohmig GA. Complement inhibition as potential new therapy for antibody-mediated rejection. Transpl Int. 2016 Apr;29(4):392-402. doi: 10.1111/tri.12706. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
Gatault P, Kamar N, Buchler M, Colosio C, Bertrand D, Durrbach A, Albano L, Rivalan J, Le Meur Y, Essig M, Bouvier N, Legendre C, Moulin B, Heng AE, Weestel PF, Sayegh J, Charpentier B, Rostaing L, Thervet E, Lebranchu Y. Reduction of Extended-Release Tacrolimus Dose in Low-Immunological-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients Increases Risk of Rejection and Appearance of Donor-Specific Antibodies: A Randomized Study. Am J Transplant. 2017 May;17(5):1370-1379. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14109. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
Loupy A, Haas M, Solez K, Racusen L, Glotz D, Seron D, Nankivell BJ, Colvin RB, Afrouzian M, Akalin E, Alachkar N, Bagnasco S, Becker JU, Cornell L, Drachenberg C, Dragun D, de Kort H, Gibson IW, Kraus ES, Lefaucheur C, Legendre C, Liapis H, Muthukumar T, Nickeleit V, Orandi B, Park W, Rabant M, Randhawa P, Reed EF, Roufosse C, Seshan SV, Sis B, Singh HK, Schinstock C, Tambur A, Zeevi A, Mengel M. The Banff 2015 Kidney Meeting Report: Current Challenges in Rejection Classification and Prospects for Adopting Molecular Pathology. Am J Transplant. 2017 Jan;17(1):28-41. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14107.
Hanafusa N, Kondo Y, Suzuki M, Nakao A, Noiri E, Fujita T. Double filtration plasmapheresis can decrease factor XIII Activity. Ther Apher Dial. 2007 Jun;11(3):165-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2007.00433.x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
38RC17.246
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.