Endothelial Microparticules and Antibody Mediated Rejection and Kidney Transplantation: Biomarker of Antibody-mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation

NCT ID: NCT03098238

Last Updated: 2022-12-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

249 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-11-30

Study Completion Date

2020-06-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Context and rationale:

Antibody-mediated rejection is the leading cause of long-term renal graft loss. It's due to the production by the recipient of antibodies directed against antigens (belonging or not to the HLA system) present on the surface of the donor specific endothelial cells (DSA), leading to graft failure.

The main difficulty to manage the humoral rejection is the delay of the diagnosis and the treatment to slow the evolution towards fibrosis.

Positivity of anti-HLA antibodies is the main risk factor for the rejection but the only way to make the diagnosis of humoral rejection is to perform a graft biopsy, an invasive process.

Endothelial microparticles (MPE) are small membrane vesicles generated by endothelial cell activation and / or apoptosis processes.

We test the hypothesis that endothelial microparticles are an early diagnostic biomarker of humoral rejection in renal transplantation allowing to detect it at the "subclinical" stage.

Primary and secondary objectives:

The main objective of this study is to estimate the performance of MPE plasma concentration for the diagnosis of humoral rejection in renal transplant patients with DSA. The secondary objective is to investigate by mass spectrometry the MPEs specific to the endothelium of the graft and to evaluate their diagnostic performance in relation to non-specific MEPs

Methodology :

We will conduct a cross-sectional evaluation of a diagnostic method from a collection of biological samples. The gold standard for the diagnosis of humoral rejection is the histological diagnosis on graft biopsy. The new test under study will be the flow cytometric assay of the MPE concentration carried out on plasma taken on the day of the graft biopsy.

Feasibility:

Among the active list of renal transplant patients attending the Montpellier University Hospital, we estimate that we can include the number of subjects required (N = 250) over 18 months. This work will be carried out in a laboratory with all the tools and techniques used, in particular flow cytometry and mass spectrometry, perfectly mastered and realized on dedicated technical platforms

Benefits / Outlook:

find a non-invasive early diagnostic biomarker to detect humoral rejection from the "subclinical" stage in order to set up an adapted treatment as quickly as possible.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Context and rationale:

Antibody-mediated rejection is the leading cause of long-term renal graft loss. It's due to the production by the recipient of antibodies directed against antigens (belonging or not to the HLA system) present on the surface of the donor specific endothelial cells (DSA), the binding of which can activate the renal endothelium and be responsible for inflammation leading to fibrosis and graft destruction.

The main obstacle in the management of the humoral rejection is the delay of the diagnosis and the treatment to slow the evolution towards fibrosis. At the beginning of the process there is no "apparent" dysfunction of the graft (elevation of serum creatinine and / or proteinuria) but only inflammation of the renal parenchyma: this is referred to as "subclinical" humoral rejection. Graft dysfunction occurs only when the inflammation is serious and responsible for irreversible lesions of fibrosis.

New sensitive detection techniques for anti-HLA antibodies allow to detect DSA well before the onset of humoral rejection but the only way to make the diagnosis of humoral rejection is to perform a graft biopsy, an invasive process with a hemorrhagic risk which can not be repeated too frequently.

Endothelial microparticles (MPE) are small membrane vesicles generated by endothelial cell activation and / or apoptosis processes. An increasing level in circulating blood appears today as a endothelial dysfunction in many pathologies. Their role in humoral rejection, a model of endothelial dysfunction, has never been explored.

We wish to test the hypothesis that endothelial microparticles are an early diagnostic biomarker of humoral rejection in renal transplantation allowing to detect it at the "subclinical" stage.

Primary and secondary objectives:

The main objective of this study is to estimate the performance of MPE plasma concentration for the diagnosis of humoral rejection in renal transplant patients with DSA. The secondary objective is to investigate by mass spectrometry the MPEs specific to the endothelium of the graft and to evaluate their diagnostic performance in relation to non-specific MEPs

Methodology :

We will conduct a cross-sectional evaluation of a diagnostic method from a collection of biological samples. The gold standard for the diagnosis of humoral rejection is the histological diagnosis on graft biopsy. The new test under study will be the flow cytometric assay of the MPE concentration carried out on plasma taken on the day of the graft biopsy.

Feasibility:

Among the active list of renal transplant patients attending the Montpellier University Hospital, we estimate that we can include the number of subjects required (N = 250) over 18 months. This work will be carried out in a laboratory with all the tools and techniques used, in particular flow cytometry and mass spectrometry, perfectly mastered and realized on dedicated technical platforms

Benefits / Outlook:

At a time when the shortage of organs is growing and becomes a real public health problem, it becomes essential to better control the management of humoral rejection, the main cause of long-term renal graft loss. One of the key steps in this step is to find a non-invasive early diagnostic biomarker to detect humoral rejection from the "subclinical" stage in order to set up an adapted treatment as quickly as possible.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Renal Transplantation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients without humoral rejection or DSA

Renal transplant patients with systematic kidney biopsy at 3 months and 12 months Patients without humoral rejection or DSA (Donor Specific Antibodies)

Group Type OTHER

Biological sample

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Biological sampling of two citrate tubes (18 ml) during a normal blood

Patient without humoral rejection with a DSA

Patient without humoral rejection with a DSA (Donor Specific Antibodies)Patients with a graft biopsy for a donor-specific anti-HLA antibody

Group Type OTHER

Biological sample

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Biological sampling of two citrate tubes (18 ml) during a normal blood

Patients with humoral rejection

Patients with humoral rejection

Group Type OTHER

Biological sample

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Biological sampling of two citrate tubes (18 ml) during a normal blood

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Biological sample

Biological sampling of two citrate tubes (18 ml) during a normal blood

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age greater than or equal to 18 years at time of inclusion
* Renal transplant patients monitored at Montpellier University Hospital
* With a recent or planned realization of a graft biopsy
* Patients with DSA (s) detected by Single Antigen Bead Assay (SAB, LabScreen Single Antigen, One Lambda Kit) with an average fluorescence intensity\> 500 IU Or Patients without DSA transplanted to a year with a systematic biopsy aspiration.

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal to participate in or to undergo the examination
* Major protected by guardianship
* History of treated humoral rejection
* Incompatible graft ABO
* Multi-organ transplantation
* Cardiovascular disease active (myocardial infarction \<3 months, arteriopathy obliterating lower limbs stage III or IV)
* Sepsis in progress
* Evolving Cancers
* Lupus nephropathy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Montpellier

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Moglie LE QUINTREC DONNETTE

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University Hospital, Montpellier

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Uhmontpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UF 9746

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

RECHMPL16_0263

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id