Identifying and Overcoming Barriers to Diabetes Management in the Elderly: An Intervention Study
NCT ID: NCT01480804
Last Updated: 2014-03-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
48 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-11-30
2012-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Identifying and Overcoming Barriers to Diabetes Management in the Elderly: A Cost-effective Intervention Study
NCT01486290
Breaking Down Barriers to Diabetes Self-Care
NCT00142922
Coaching and Education for Diabetes Distress
NCT03617146
The Effect of a Coordinated Inpatient Diabetes Education Program in the Outpatient Setting
NCT00657800
Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Behavioral Change Intervention for People With Type 2 Diabetes and Diabetes Distress
NCT05941000
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Geriatric diabetes team intervention group
The subjects in this group underwent evaluation for barriers to self care by a diabetes educators well versed with age specific barriers. After consideration of patients clinical, functional, and psychosocial background a geriatric diabetes team devised strategy to help patients cope respective barriers. A care manager then implemented the coping strategies by educating patients and caregivers. She also made home visits to assess any safety issues not know to clinic based geriatric team. She helped the patients and caregivers with all aspects of care coordination. Patients in this group received phone contact from care managers as many times as needed over the six month intervention period.
Intervention for age specific barriers to self care
The intervention included developing strategies to help patients cope with their barriers to self care. The intervention were implemented by care manager over 6 month period in person and by phone calls. During the six to twelve month period subjects did not have any contact with study staff or care manager.
Attention Control Group
The subjects in the group received similar, in person, contact as the intervention group. An educator, separate from the one involved in the intervention team, called patents in this group for a total of eleven time within the first six months. The phone calls were forces toward general discussion without any diabetes related advice.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intervention for age specific barriers to self care
The intervention included developing strategies to help patients cope with their barriers to self care. The intervention were implemented by care manager over 6 month period in person and by phone calls. During the six to twelve month period subjects did not have any contact with study staff or care manager.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes
* Seen at Joslin Clinic or Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center for at least one year
* HbA1c 8% X 2 in past 6 months without fluctuation of more than 0.5% (i.e. stable poor control)
* No major change in medications in past 3 months, e.g. addition of insulin or another hypoglycemic agent
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who live more than 25 miles from Joslin Clinic/ Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
* Patients who live in an institutional setting, e.g. nursing home, group home, etc
* Patients who are not able to complete outcome assessments,(e.g. poor vision, diminished mental capacity/severe cognitive decline, unable to speak/read/write English, etc)
* Patients will be excluded from participation in Study Aim 3 if they have a history of orthostatic hypotension, TIA, or vertebral basilar insufficiency
69 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
United States Department of Defense
FED
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
OTHER
Joslin Diabetes Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Medha Munshi
Director of Geriactric Diabetes Clinic
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Medha N Munshi, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Joslin Diabetes Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Beth Isreal Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Joslin Diabetes Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Makimattila S, Malmberg-Ceder K, Hakkinen AM, Vuori K, Salonen O, Summanen P, Yki-Jarvinen H, Kaste M, Heikkinen S, Lundbom N, Roine RO. Brain metabolic alterations in patients with type 1 diabetes-hyperglycemia-induced injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2004 Dec;24(12):1393-9. doi: 10.1097/01.WCB.0000143700.15489.B2.
Norris SL, Nichols PJ, Caspersen CJ, Glasgow RE, Engelgau MM, Jack L, Isham G, Snyder SR, Carande-Kulis VG, Garfield S, Briss P, McCulloch D. The effectiveness of disease and case management for people with diabetes. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2002 May;22(4 Suppl):15-38. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00423-3.
Fordyce M, Bardole D, Romer L, Soghikian K, Fireman B. Senior Team Assessment and Referral Program--STAR. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1997 Nov-Dec;10(6):398-406.
Munshi M, Grande L, Hayes M, Ayres D, Suhl E, Capelson R, Lin S, Milberg W, Weinger K. Cognitive dysfunction is associated with poor diabetes control in older adults. Diabetes Care. 2006 Aug;29(8):1794-9. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0506.
Harris MI, Flegal KM, Cowie CC, Eberhardt MS, Goldstein DE, Little RR, Wiedmeyer HM, Byrd-Holt DD. Prevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance in U.S. adults. The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Diabetes Care. 1998 Apr;21(4):518-24. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.4.518.
Blaum CS, Ofstedal MB, Langa KM, Wray LA. Functional status and health outcomes in older americans with diabetes mellitus. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Jun;51(6):745-53. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.51256.x.
Bertoni AG, Kirk JK, Goff DC Jr, Wagenknecht LE. Excess mortality related to diabetes mellitus in elderly Medicare beneficiaries. Ann Epidemiol. 2004 May;14(5):362-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2003.09.004.
Economic consequences of diabetes mellitus in the U.S. in 1997. American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 1998 Feb;21(2):296-309. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.2.296.
Brown AF, Mangione CM, Saliba D, Sarkisian CA; California Healthcare Foundation/American Geriatrics Society Panel on Improving Care for Elders with Diabetes. Guidelines for improving the care of the older person with diabetes mellitus. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 May;51(5 Suppl Guidelines):S265-80. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.51.5s.1.x. No abstract available.
Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Recommendations for healthcare system and self-management education interventions to reduce morbidity and mortality from diabetes. Am J Prev Med. 2002 May;22(4 Suppl):10-4. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00422-1. No abstract available.
Baird TA, Parsons MW, Barber PA, Butcher KS, Desmond PM, Tress BM, Colman PG, Jerums G, Chambers BR, Davis SM. The influence of diabetes mellitus and hyperglycaemia on stroke incidence and outcome. J Clin Neurosci. 2002 Nov;9(6):618-26. doi: 10.1054/jocn.2002.1081.
Fulesdi B, Limburg M, Bereczki D, Kaplar M, Molnar C, Kappelmayer J, Neuwirth G, Csiba L. Cerebrovascular reactivity and reserve capacity in type II diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Complications. 1999 Jul-Aug;13(4):191-9. doi: 10.1016/s1056-8727(99)00044-6.
Griffith DN, Saimbi S, Lewis C, Tolfree S, Betteridge DJ. Abnormal cerebrovascular carbon dioxide reactivity in people with diabetes. Diabet Med. 1987 May-Jun;4(3):217-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1987.tb00865.x.
Kadoi Y, Hinohara H, Kunimoto F, Saito S, Ide M, Hiraoka H, Kawahara F, Goto F. Diabetic patients have an impaired cerebral vasodilatory response to hypercapnia under propofol anesthesia. Stroke. 2003 Oct;34(10):2399-403. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000090471.28672.65. Epub 2003 Sep 4.
Jimenez-Bonilla JF, Carril JM, Quirce R, Gomez-Barquin R, Amado JA, Gutierrez-Mendiguchia C. Assessment of cerebral blood flow in diabetic patients with no clinical history of neurological disease. Nucl Med Commun. 1996 Sep;17(9):790-4. doi: 10.1097/00006231-199609000-00009.
MacLeod KM, Gold AE, Ebmeier KP, Hepburn DA, Deary IJ, Goodwin GM, Frier BM. The effects of acute hypoglycemia on relative cerebral blood flow distribution in patients with type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes and impaired hypoglycemia awareness. Metabolism. 1996 Aug;45(8):974-80. doi: 10.1016/s0026-0495(96)90266-8.
KATZ S, FORD AB, MOSKOWITZ RW, JACKSON BA, JAFFE MW. STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION. JAMA. 1963 Sep 21;185:914-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016. No abstract available.
Bean JF, Kiely DK, Leveille SG, Herman S, Huynh C, Fielding R, Frontera W. The 6-minute walk test in mobility-limited elders: what is being measured? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002 Nov;57(11):M751-6. doi: 10.1093/gerona/57.11.m751.
Lord SR, Menz HB. Physiologic, psychologic, and health predictors of 6-minute walk performance in older people. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Jul;83(7):907-11. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.33227.
Bautmans I, Lambert M, Mets T. The six-minute walk test in community dwelling elderly: influence of health status. BMC Geriatr. 2004 Jul 23;4:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-4-6.
Montorio I, Izal M. The Geriatric Depression Scale: a review of its development and utility. Int Psychogeriatr. 1996 Spring;8(1):103-12. doi: 10.1017/s1041610296002505.
Welch G, Weinger K, Anderson B, Polonsky WH. Responsiveness of the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) questionnaire. Diabet Med. 2003 Jan;20(1):69-72. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.00832.x.
Tiecks FP, Lam AM, Aaslid R, Newell DW. Comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation measurements. Stroke. 1995 Jun;26(6):1014-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.26.6.1014.
Panerai RB. Assessment of cerebral pressure autoregulation in humans--a review of measurement methods. Physiol Meas. 1998 Aug;19(3):305-38. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/19/3/001.
Aaslid R, Newell DW, Stooss R, Sorteberg W, Lindegaard KF. Assessment of cerebral autoregulation dynamics from simultaneous arterial and venous transcranial Doppler recordings in humans. Stroke. 1991 Sep;22(9):1148-54. doi: 10.1161/01.str.22.9.1148.
Zhang R, Zuckerman JH, Giller CA, Levine BD. Transfer function analysis of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in humans. Am J Physiol. 1998 Jan;274(1 Pt 2):H233-41. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1998.274.1.h233.
Panerai RB, Dawson SL, Potter JF. Linear and nonlinear analysis of human dynamic cerebral autoregulation. Am J Physiol. 1999 Sep;277(3):H1089-99. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1999.277.3.H1089.
Lipsitz LA, Mukai S, Hamner J, Gagnon M, Babikian V. Dynamic regulation of middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity in aging and hypertension. Stroke. 2000 Aug;31(8):1897-903. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.8.1897.
Benarroch EE, S.P., Low PA, The Valsalva Manuever. In Clinical Autonomic Disroders: Evaluation and Management, L.P. editor, Editor. 1993, Little Brown and company: Boston. p. 209-215.
Rutan GH, Hermanson B, Bild DE, Kittner SJ, LaBaw F, Tell GS. Orthostatic hypotension in older adults. The Cardiovascular Health Study. CHS Collaborative Research Group. Hypertension. 1992 Jun;19(6 Pt 1):508-19. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.19.6.508.
Low, P.A., Laboratory Evaluation of Autonomic Function. In Clinical Autonomic Disorders, P.A. Low, Editor. 1997, LIppincott-Raven: Philadelphia. p. 179-208.
Novak V, Chowdhary A, Farrar B, Nagaraja H, Braun J, Kanard R, Novak P, Slivka A. Altered cerebral vasoregulation in hypertension and stroke. Neurology. 2003 May 27;60(10):1657-63. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000068023.14587.06.
Greenfield JC Jr, Rembert JC, Tindall GT. Transient changes in cerebral vascular resistance during the Valsalva maneuver in man. Stroke. 1984 Jan-Feb;15(1):76-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.15.1.76.
Werner C, Kochs E, Hoffman WE, Blanc IF, Schulte am Esch J. Cerebral blood flow and cerebral blood flow velocity during angiotensin-induced arterial hypertension in dogs. Can J Anaesth. 1993 Aug;40(8):755-60. doi: 10.1007/BF03009772.
Munshi MN, Segal AR, Suhl E, Ryan C, Sternthal A, Giusti J, Lee Y, Fitzgerald S, Staum E, Bonsignor P, DesRochers L, McCartney R, Weinger K. Assessment of barriers to improve diabetes management in older adults: a randomized controlled study. Diabetes Care. 2013 Mar;36(3):543-9. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1303. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
06-15
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.