Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
30 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2011-11-30
2012-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective: The primary objective of this study is to investigate the potential of the photonic needle to discriminate between correct and incorrect placement of the needle tip in the target area of the procedure (M4 - tissue), as confirmed by contrast-enhanced fluoroscopy. The secondary objectives are to investigate the differences in the optical signals obtained with the photonic needle at a set of different pre-defined positions (M1, M2 and M3) encountered along the needle trajectory during above-mentioned procedures, and to detect potential intravascular positioning of the needle-tip at the target point (M4 - blood), Study design: this is a single blind observational study. Study population: Patients who have radicular pain on lumbar level, for example caused by disc herniation, and/or lateral recessus stenosis and/or radiculopathy eci.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study parameters are: 1) successfully acquired diffuse reflectance spectra obtained at measurement point M4: midforaminal, halfway the foramen (the target treatment location) as encountered during image-guided intraforaminal injections on lumbar level, 2) confirmation of target area with fluoroscopy and injection of contrast fluid (gold standard), 3) "Certainty score" on a 3-point scale (1 = uncertain, 2 = certain, 3 = very certain) will be provided by the physician. The type of tissue present at the needle tip will be based on the information available from imaging .
The secondary study parameters are: 1) successfully acquired diffuse reflectance spectra obtained at measurement points M1-M3: M1 in muscle, M2 extra-foraminal, M3 foraminal at a distance 1/3 of the diameter of the foramen from the entrance of the foramen, as encountered during image-guided intraforaminal injections on lumbar level, 2) successfully acquired diffuse reflectance spectra obtained at measurement point M4, in case of a vascular puncture (M4-blood), 3) confirmation images by ultrasound imaging at location M1 as described above, 4) confirmation images by fluoroscopy at locations M2 and M3, 5) digital subtraction angiography images after contrast injection at location M4, confirming vascular penetration (gold standard for vessel puncture), 6) "Certainty score" on a 3-point scale (1 = uncertain, 2 = certain, 3 = very certain) provided by the physician for assignment of the type of tissue present at the needle tip, based on the information available from imaging at M1 and at M4.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Phase I Study Evaluating The Safety And Efficacy of a Device for Collection of Electrical Bioimpedance Data
NCT00746915
Regeneration of Acutely Injured Nerves With Temporary Electrical Stimulation
NCT05721261
Peripheral Nerve Activation Sensitivity
NCT07160413
Cryoablation for Phantom Limb Pain
NCT02366832
Percutaneous High Frequency Alternating Current Stimulation in Healthy Volunteers
NCT04346719
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients' age is 18 - 80 years
* Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Photodynamic therapy used before
* Inability to give informed consent
* Contrast fluid allergy
* Any operation on the spine at the side of intervention
* Coagulation disorders / disturbance
* Infections at the level of intervention
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Philips Healthcare
INDUSTRY
Maastricht University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Maarten van Kleef, prof. Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Maastricht University Medical Center
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MEC 11-1-005
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.