Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) Versus PFNA Augmentation

NCT ID: NCT01473082

Last Updated: 2020-08-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

251 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-02-29

Study Completion Date

2016-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether patients with trochanteric fractures being treated with a Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) and augmentation can better be mobilized than patients without augmentation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

To avoid the pain-causing relative movement between implant and bone, surgical techniques and devices allowing augmentation of the femoral head have recently been developed. Biomechanical studies showed that augmentation leads to a better axial stability and pull-out strength. In clinical practice, this might facilitate early mobilization and full weight-bearing with less pain. The purpose of this study is therefore to evaluate whether patients with trochanteric fractures being treated with a PFNA and augmentation can better be mobilized than patients without augmentation. In particular, it will be measured whether patients with a PFNA Augmentation can walk faster than the non-augmented patients, measured with the Timed up and Go test.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Fractures Closed Fracture of Hip

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PFNA

Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA Synthes)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PFNA (Synthes)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA)

PFNA Augmentation

Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation PFNA Augmentation (Synthes) with Traumacem V+ Synthes

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PFNA Augmentation (Synthes)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) Augmentation (with Traumacem V+)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PFNA Augmentation (Synthes)

Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) Augmentation (with Traumacem V+)

Intervention Type DEVICE

PFNA (Synthes)

Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

PFNA Augmentation (Synthes) length 240 mm PFNA Augmentation (Synthes) small length 200 mm PFNA Augmentation (Synthes) xs length 170 mm PFNA Augmentation (Synthes) long lengths 300-420 mm PFNA length 240 mm PFNA small length 200 mm PFNA xs length 170 mm PFNA long lengths 300-420 mm

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 75 years and older
* Closed unstable trochanteric fracture: AO 31 - A2 and A3
* Low energy trauma (e.g.fall from standing height)
* Definitive fracture fixation within 72 hrs. after admission
* Indication for PFNA fixation (with or without augmentation)
* Ability to walk independently (walking aids are allowed) prior to injury
* Signed written informed consent and agreement to attend the planned FUs
* Able to understand and read country national language at an elementary level

Exclusion Criteria

* Pathologic fracture
* Polytrauma
* Any additional fracture
* Open fracture
* Recent history of substance abuse (ie, recreational drugs, alcohol) that would preclude reliable assessment
* Active malignancy defined as history of invasive malignancy, except if the patient has received treatment and displayed no clinical signs and symptoms for at least five years
* ASA class V and VI
* Any implant at the same hip
* Hemiplegia
* Patients with legal guardian
* Patients who have participated in any other device or drug related clinical trial that could influence the results of the present study within the previous month
* Fractures and injuries opening into the articulation and vascular structure
* Infection
* Patients with clotting disorders
* Patients with severe cardiac and / or pulmonary insufficiency
* Patients with known hypersensitivity or allergy to any of the components of Traumacem V+ cement (Polymethyl methacrylate / acrylate, zirconium dioxide, hydroxyapatite,benzoyl peroxide, methyl methacrylate,hydroquinone, N,N-dimethyl-p-toluidine)
* Perforation of the femoral head into the joint with the guide wire used for the PFNA blade
* Risk of potential leakage into the joint identified by using contrast fluid (PFNA Augmentation group only)
* Intraoperative decision to use implants other than PFNA
Minimum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing Documentation

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andreas Faeh

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation, Davos, Switzerland

Christian Kammerlander, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medical University of Innsbruck

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

KUL Univ. Ziekenhuizen Leuven

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

BGU Tübingen

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

University of Ulm

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Sophien und Hufeland Klinikum GmbH

Weimar, , Germany

Site Status

Hadassah Medical Organization

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Sykehuset i Vestfold HF Tønsberg

Tønsberg, , Norway

Site Status

Cantonal Hospital Lucerne

Lucerne, , Switzerland

Site Status

City Hospital Waid

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Belgium Germany Israel Norway Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kammerlander C, Hem ES, Klopfer T, Gebhard F, Sermon A, Dietrich M, Bach O, Weil Y, Babst R, Blauth M. Cement augmentation of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) - A multicentre randomized controlled trial. Injury. 2018 Aug;49(8):1436-1444. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.04.022. Epub 2018 Apr 22.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29724590 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PFNA augmented

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.