Transepithelial Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Keratoconus and Corneal Ectasia

NCT ID: NCT01464268

Last Updated: 2023-02-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

160 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-11-30

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) has been proposed as an effective method of reducing progression of both keratoconus and corneal ectasia after surgery, as well as possibly decreasing the steepness of the cornea in these pathologies. During previous studies of the CXL procedure, the surface epithelial cells have been removed. Transepithelial crosslinking in which the epithelium is not removed has been proposed to offer a number of advantages over traditional crosslinking including an increased safety profile by reducing the risk for infection as no epithelial barrier will be broken, faster visual recovery and improved patient comfort in the early postoperative healing period.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The objective of this study is to investigate the difference between two regimens of transepithelial crosslinking. The study will compare two riboflavin dosing regimens during the crosslinking procedure. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking performed with riboflavin 0.1% for reducing corneal curvature. Safety and efficacy outcomes will then be compared between the treatment groups. In particular, we will compare the two groups with regard to their efficacy in reducing corneal curvature. Secondary outcomes will include visual acuity. Safety assessments will include a tabulation of adverse events, patient symptoms, loss of visual acuity, changes in endothelial cell density, slit lamp examination of the cornea and lens, and contact lens tolerance for contact lens wearers

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Keratoconus Corneal Ectasia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Riboflavin drops every minute

Administration of riboflavin every 2 minutes for the duration of UV exposure.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Riboflavin

Intervention Type DRUG

Administration of riboflavin every 1 minute for the duration of UV exposure.

Riboflavin drops every 2 minutes

Administration of riboflavin every 1 minute for the duration of UV exposure.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Riboflavin

Intervention Type DRUG

Administration of riboflavin every 2 minutes for the duration of UV exposure.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Riboflavin

Administration of riboflavin every 2 minutes for the duration of UV exposure.

Intervention Type DRUG

Riboflavin

Administration of riboflavin every 1 minute for the duration of UV exposure.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Riboflavin without dextran Riboflavin without Dextran

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years of age or older
* A diagnosis of keratoconus or a diagnosis of corneal ectasia after corneal refractive surgery
* Vision with contact lenses or glasses is worse than 20/20
* Corneal thickness greater than 375 microns at the thinnest point

Exclusion Criteria

* Eyes classified as either normal, atypical normal, or keratoconus suspect on the severity grading scheme.
* Corneal pachymetry ≤ 350 microns at the thinnest point measured by Pentacam in the eye(s) to be treated.
* Previous ocular condition (other than refractive error) in the eye(s) to be treated that may predispose the eye for future complications
* Clinically significant corneal scarring in the CXL treatment zone
* Pregnancy (including plan to become pregnant) or lactation during the course of the study
* A known sensitivity to study medications
* Patients with nystagmus or any other condition that would prevent a steady gaze during the CXL treatment or other diagnostic tests.
* Patients with a current condition that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with or prolong epithelial healing.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cornea and Laser Eye Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peter Hersh, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cornea and Laser Eye Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cornea and Laser Eye Institute

Teaneck, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hersh PS, Greenstein SA, Fry KL. Corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: One-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jan;37(1):149-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.030.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21183110 (View on PubMed)

Davis SA, Bovelle R, Han G, Kwagyan J. Corneal collagen cross-linking for bacterial infectious keratitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 17;6(6):CD013001. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013001.pub2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32557558 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CLEI-EpiCXL

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Lacripep for Corneal Wound Healing Study
NCT06854393 RECRUITING PHASE2