Daptomycin + Meropenem Versus Ceftazidime in the Treatment of Nosocomial Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

NCT ID: NCT01455246

Last Updated: 2014-10-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-10-31

Study Completion Date

2014-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Nosocomial spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is frequently caused by multi drug resistant bacteria. Standard treatment of SBP could be ineffective. The aim of the study is to compare daptomycin + meropenem vs ceftazidime in the treatment of nosocomial SBP.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a well known complication in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites. Nosocomial SBP is defined as SBP that occurs after 48 hours of hospitalization. It has been shown that patients with nosocomial SBP have a worse prognosis than patients with community-acquired SBP. It has also been shown that nosocomial SBP is frequently caused by multi drug resistant bacteria such as extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing enterobacteria or meticillin - resistant staphylococcus aureus. Currently the empirical treatment of SBP is the use of third generation cephalosporins or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. In patients affected by nosocomial SBP these treatment could be ineffective. Up to now an empirical approach with a broader spectrum strategy (such as an association between meropenem and daptomycin) has never been compared to standard therapy in the treatment of nosocomial SBP. Thus, the aim of the study is to compare daptomycin + meropenem vs ceftazidime in the treatment of nosocomial SBP in patients with cirrhosis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cirrhosis Ascites Nosocomial Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Daptomycin + Meropenem

30 patients with cirrhosis and nosocomial SBP

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Daptomycin + Meropenem

Intervention Type DRUG

Daptomycin will be administered at the dose of 6 mg/kg every 24 hours and 6 mg/kg every 48 hours for an estimated creatinine clearance (CKD-EPI) of \> 30 ml/min and \< 30 ml/min respectively. Meropenem will be administered at the dose of 1 g t.i.d., 1 g b.i.d., 0.5 g every 24 hours for an estimated creatinine clearance of \>50 ml/min, 10-50 ml/min, and \< 10 ml/min respectively. The treatment will go on for 7 days. In the patients without response to treatment after 48 hours will be added a rescue therapy with fluconazole. In patients in which cultures shown a bacterial species resistant to therapy, daptomycin and meropenem will be discontinued and replaced by a therapy based on antibiotic susceptibility of isolated species.

Ceftazidime

30 patients with cirrhosis and nosocomial SBP

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ceftazidime

Intervention Type DRUG

Ceftazidime will be administered at the dose of 2 g t.i.d, 2 g b.i.d and 2 g at every 24 hours by intravenous infusion for an estimated creatinine clearance (CKD-EPI) of \>50 ml/min, 10-50 ml/min, and \< 10 ml/min respectively. The treatment will go on for 7 days. In the patients without response to treatment after 48 hours, or in which cultures shown a bacterial species resistant to therapy, ceftazidime will be discontinued and replaced by a rescue therapy with meropenem and daptomycin as provided for the experimental arm

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Daptomycin + Meropenem

Daptomycin will be administered at the dose of 6 mg/kg every 24 hours and 6 mg/kg every 48 hours for an estimated creatinine clearance (CKD-EPI) of \> 30 ml/min and \< 30 ml/min respectively. Meropenem will be administered at the dose of 1 g t.i.d., 1 g b.i.d., 0.5 g every 24 hours for an estimated creatinine clearance of \>50 ml/min, 10-50 ml/min, and \< 10 ml/min respectively. The treatment will go on for 7 days. In the patients without response to treatment after 48 hours will be added a rescue therapy with fluconazole. In patients in which cultures shown a bacterial species resistant to therapy, daptomycin and meropenem will be discontinued and replaced by a therapy based on antibiotic susceptibility of isolated species.

Intervention Type DRUG

Ceftazidime

Ceftazidime will be administered at the dose of 2 g t.i.d, 2 g b.i.d and 2 g at every 24 hours by intravenous infusion for an estimated creatinine clearance (CKD-EPI) of \>50 ml/min, 10-50 ml/min, and \< 10 ml/min respectively. The treatment will go on for 7 days. In the patients without response to treatment after 48 hours, or in which cultures shown a bacterial species resistant to therapy, ceftazidime will be discontinued and replaced by a rescue therapy with meropenem and daptomycin as provided for the experimental arm

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites
* Meets all criteria for nosocomial SBP as outlined below

* Ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear cells count \>250/mm3
* Onset of signs and symptoms of infection after 72 hours of hospitalization

Exclusion Criteria

* Hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria
* Abdominal surgery within 4 weeks
* Evidence of secondary peritonitis, pancreatitis or peritoneal carcinomatosis
* Significant heart or respiratory failure
* Allergy to ceftazidime, meropenem or daptomycin
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Padova

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Paolo Angeli, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dept. of Clinical and Experimenatl Medicine, University of Padova, Italy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dept. of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Padova

Padua, PD, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rimola A, Garcia-Tsao G, Navasa M, Piddock LJ, Planas R, Bernard B, Inadomi JM. Diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a consensus document. International Ascites Club. J Hepatol. 2000 Jan;32(1):142-53. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(00)80201-9. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10673079 (View on PubMed)

Fasolato S, Angeli P, Dallagnese L, Maresio G, Zola E, Mazza E, Salinas F, Dona S, Fagiuoli S, Sticca A, Zanus G, Cillo U, Frasson I, Destro C, Gatta A. Renal failure and bacterial infections in patients with cirrhosis: epidemiology and clinical features. Hepatology. 2007 Jan;45(1):223-9. doi: 10.1002/hep.21443.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17187409 (View on PubMed)

Angeli P, Guarda S, Fasolato S, Miola E, Craighero R, Piccolo F, Antona C, Brollo L, Franchin M, Cillo U, Merkel C, Gatta A. Switch therapy with ciprofloxacin vs. intravenous ceftazidime in the treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with cirrhosis: similar efficacy at lower cost. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Jan 1;23(1):75-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02706.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16393283 (View on PubMed)

Cheong HS, Kang CI, Lee JA, Moon SY, Joung MK, Chung DR, Koh KC, Lee NY, Song JH, Peck KR. Clinical significance and outcome of nosocomial acquisition of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with liver cirrhosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 May 1;48(9):1230-6. doi: 10.1086/597585.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19302016 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010-019625-34

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2059P

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.