Rifaximin as a Prophylaxis of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Comparison With Ciprofloxacin

NCT ID: NCT06234046

Last Updated: 2024-01-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-05-28

Study Completion Date

2023-12-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this Randomized controlled trial is to assessment the efficacy of Rifaximin as a prophylaxis of SBP in comparison with ciprofloxacin in Egyptian patients.

This randomized controlled trial included 80 Egyptian patients diagnosed with cirrhotic liver disease and ascites just recovered from SBP attack grouped into two groups as; Group (1) included 40 cases received Rifaximin as 550 mg twice daily dose for a six-months period and group (2) included 40 cases received Ciprofloxacin as 750 mg once weekly dose for a six-months period.

All patients of the two groups were followed up for recurrence of SBP for 6 months. The study endpoints would be SBP, death, compliance failure, or liver transplantation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This randomized controlled trial included 80 Egyptian patients diagnosed with cirrhotic liver disease and ascites just recovered from SBP attack grouped into two groups as;

* Group (1) included 40 cases received Rifaximin as 550 mg twice daily dose for a six-months period.
* Group (2) included 40 cases received Ciprofloxacin as 750 mg once weekly dose for a six-months period.

The included cases were collected from hepatology outpatient clinic and inpatient department at Ain shams University hospital between May 2023 and November 2023 after the scientific ethical committee approval. A written consent was obtained from the included cases.

Cases with metastatic HCC, patients with drug allergy from Ciprofloxacin or Rifaximin, those having ascites secondary to other causes rather than liver cirrhosis, those having gastroenterology malignancy, patients on immunotherapy, and HIV patients were all excluded from the trial. Before starting the trial, the all cases were diagnosed as SBP with ascitic fluid sample with polymorphonuclear cell count more than 250 cells /µL and received medical treatment of SBP according to EASL guidelines for treatment of SBP.

All patients of the two groups were followed up for recurrence of SBP for 6 months. The study endpoints would be SBP, death, compliance failure, or liver transplantation.

All included patients went through a comprehensive medical history, full physical assessment as well as full laboratory examination including; CBC, liver profile (ALT, AST, ALP, GGT, total \& direct bilirubin, serum albumin, serum total proteins), kidney function tests (S.creat, BUN), ascitic fluid sample was taken from every patients at the starting of the trial to make sure the recovery from the previous SBP attack (AFS1) and another sample was taken once the patient was suspected to have another attack of SBP or after 6 months of treatment (AFS2). The ascitic samples were subjected to analysis of the differential cell count and measurement of ascitic albumin, glucose, total proteins and LDH, culture and sensitivity were assessed. The Child-Pugh's score were assessed, and pelvi-abdominal ultrasound were done for all patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This randomized controlled trial was performed on two groups of Egyptian patients diagnosed with cirrhotic liver disease and ascites just recovered from SBP attack, group (1) included 40 patients were administered Rifaximin as 550 mg twice daily dosage for six months and group (2)included 40 patients were administered Ciprofloxacin as 750 mg once weekly dose for 6 months. All patients of the two groups were followed up for recurrence of SBP for 6 months.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

no masking

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

group (1)

Group (1) included 40 cases received Rifaximin as 550 mg twice daily dose for a six-months period.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rifaximin 550Mg Tab

Intervention Type DRUG

group (1) received Rifaximin as 550 mg twice daily dosage for six months.

ascitic fluid sample

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

aspiration of ascitic fluid sample and analysis for differential cell count

group (2)

Group (2) included 40 cases received Ciprofloxacin as 750 mg once weekly dose for a six-months period.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ciprofloxacin 750 MG

Intervention Type DRUG

group (2) received Ciprofloxacin 750 mg tab mg once weekly dosage for six months.

ascitic fluid sample

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

aspiration of ascitic fluid sample and analysis for differential cell count

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Rifaximin 550Mg Tab

group (1) received Rifaximin as 550 mg twice daily dosage for six months.

Intervention Type DRUG

Ciprofloxacin 750 MG

group (2) received Ciprofloxacin 750 mg tab mg once weekly dosage for six months.

Intervention Type DRUG

ascitic fluid sample

aspiration of ascitic fluid sample and analysis for differential cell count

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

gastrobiotic Cipro aspiration of ascitic fluid

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* cirrhotic liver disease patients with ascites just recovered from SBP attack.
* Must be able to swallow tablets

Exclusion Criteria

* Cases with metastatic HCC.
* patients with drug allergy from Ciprofloxacin or Rifaximin.
* those having ascites secondary to other causes rather than liver cirrhosis.
* those having gastroenterology malignancy.
* patients on immunotherapy.
* HIV patients.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ain Shams University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mostafa Elfors

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FMASU R140/2023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id