Hydrogel Endovascular Aneurysm Treatment Trial

NCT ID: NCT01407952

Last Updated: 2019-06-27

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

600 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-04-30

Study Completion Date

2018-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This research study is being done to test the effectiveness of a new generation FDA approved device for treating aneurysms compared to the current standard device for endovascular aneurysm treatment which is bare platinum coils. Endovascular procedures are a form of minimally invasive surgery, which is performed on blood vessels. The technique involves the introduction of a catheter which is a long, thin, flexible, hollow plastic tube through the skin into a large blood vessel. Typically the chosen blood vessel is the femoral artery found near the groin. The catheter is then maneuvered through the body to the location of the aneurysm in the brain using image guidance. Coils are delivered into the aneurysm through the catheters. Once the coils are delivered in the aneurysm, they are detached from the catheter. This is repeated until enough coils fill the aneurysm, blocking the blood flow to the aneurysm. The body responds by forming blood clots around the coil(s), which helps block the flow of blood into the aneurysm and keeps the vessel from rupturing or leaking. This study will compare the study device to the standard bare platinum coil to see which is better at preventing future rupturing or leaking. The study device is called the HydroCoil Embolization System and this study is a post-market clinical trial.

About 600 subjects from multiple institutions will take part in this study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Your part in this study will last up to 24 months and will involve 6 visits (1 baseline visit before your surgery, the surgical procedure and 4 follow-up visits). These visits will occur at the same time as the visits you would receive as standard of care after your surgery.

If you are in this study, you will be placed in one of two study groups by chance using a process similar to the flip of a coin. This process is called randomization. Neither you nor the study staff will select the group you will be in. One group, the control group, will have their aneurysm treated by the bare platinum coils during their endovascular procedure. The other group, the study group will receive coils from the HydroCoil Embolization System. Both groups will receive the same standard of care and follow-up, but during the surgery different types of coils will be used.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cerebral Aneurysm

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

HydroCoil Embolic System

Aneurysm treatment using the HydroCoil Embolization System (21 CFR 882.5950)

Group Type OTHER

HydroCoil Embolic System

Intervention Type DEVICE

HydroCoil Embolic System

Control

Aneurysm treatment using bare platinum coil(s)

Group Type OTHER

Control (bare platinum coils)

Intervention Type DEVICE

bare platinum coils

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HydroCoil Embolic System

HydroCoil Embolic System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Control (bare platinum coils)

bare platinum coils

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

MicroVention, Inc

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Candidates for this study must meet the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:

1. Patient is between 18 and 75 years of age (inclusive).
2. Patient has a documented untreated intracranial saccular aneurysm 3-14 mm diameter angiographic lumen, ruptured or unruptured, suitable for embolization with coils.
3. Patients presenting with a HUNT and HESS Grade 0-3 or improving to such a grade before treatment
4. Any type of bare platinum coils and HydroCoil ® Coils are treatment options (all shapes allowed).
5. Patient or next of kin or person with appropriate power of attorney has provided written informed consent.
6. Patient is willing and available for study follow-up visits
7. Patient has not been previously entered into this Study

Exclusion Criteria

Candidates will be ineligible for enrollment in the study if any of the following conditions apply:

1. Inability to obtain informed consent
2. Patient is \< 18 or \> 75 years old
3. Target aneurysm is not saccular in nature (mycotic, fusiform, dissecting).
4. Target aneurysm is \> 14 mm maximum luminal dimension, \< 3 mm maximum luminal dimension
5. Target aneurysm has been previously clipped or coiled
6. Target aneurysm is in the physician's estimate unlikely to be successfully treated by endovascular techniques.
7. Patient has known hypersensitivity to platinum, nickel, stainless steel or structurally related compounds found in HydroCoil®, HydroSoft®, HydroFrame® Coils and/or bare platinum coils.
8. Baseline Hunt and Hess scale 4 or 5 for ruptured aneurysms
9. Intended use of a flow diverting stent (e.g. pipeline)
10. Subject has concurrent intracranial pathology, e.g.

* Moyamoya
* Vasculitis documented by biopsy results
* AVMs
* AV fistulas
* Significant atherosclerotic disease (i.e. symptomatic and or \>50% narrowing of the parent arteries necessary to traverse in order to coil the target aneurysm)
* Intracranial Hematoma (unrelated to the target aneurysm)
* Brain tumors
* Vascular tortuosity and other conditions preventing access to target aneurysm
11. Subject has serious co-morbidities that could confound the study results:

* Uncontrolled hypertension
* Uncorrectable coagulation abnormality
* Contraindications for heparin, aspirin or clopidogrel
* Uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus
* Organ failure of kidney, liver, heart, or lung
* Myocardial infarction within the past 6 months
* Cancer likely to cause death within 2 years or less.
12. Subject history indicates high risk of non-compliance (e.g., substance abuse, psychosocial issues, etc.)
13. Subject has a known history contraindicating contrast dye or iodine that cannot be pre-medicated prior to coiling procedure (vs. sensitivity which can be safely controlled by antihistamine, steroid, etc.). Medical clearance will be needed for this issue.
14. Patients who are unable to complete scheduled follow up assessments at the enrolling center due to limited life expectancy (\<2 years), co-morbidities or geographical considerations
15. Subject is currently breast feeding, pregnant or plans to become pregnant in the next 2 years.
16. Major surgical procedure or trauma within 30 days prior to randomization
17. The patient is currently enrolled in another clinical study (device or drug).
18. More than one aneurysm needing treatment at the same time.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

MicroVention, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Northwestern University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bernard Bendok

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bernard R Bendok, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St. Joseph's Hospital

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Mercy General Hospital

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Kaiser Permanente Sacramento

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Christiana Hospital

Newark, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Lyerly Neurosurgery

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Baptist Cardiac and Vascular Institute

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Queens Medical Center

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Advocate Health

Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Louisville

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Norton Healthcare

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

University of Maryland

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Consulting Radiologists, LTD

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Washington University

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Capital Health Regional Medical Center

Trenton, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albany Medical College

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Columbia University

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

SUNY Stony Brook

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Site Status

SUNY Upstate Medical University

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

East Carolina University

Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma University Health Sciences Center

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Kaiser Permanente NW

Clackamas, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Oregon Health and Science University

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

UPMC Hamot

Erie, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Thomas Jefferson University

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Rhode Island Hospital

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Methodist Hospital Research Institute

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Virginia

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

MultiCare Health System

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

West Virginia University

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Dalhousie Univerisity

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton Health/McMaster Univeristy

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

CHUM Research Centre

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

McGill Universtiy

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

University of Saskatchewan

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

CHU de Quebec

Québec, , Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bendok BR, Abi-Aad KR, Ward JD, Kniss JF, Kwasny MJ, Rahme RJ, Aoun SG, El Ahmadieh TY, El Tecle NE, Zammar SG, Aoun RJN, Patra DP, Ansari SA, Raymond J, Woo HH, Fiorella D, Dabus G, Milot G, Delgado Almandoz JE, Scott JA, DeNardo AJ, Dashti SR; HEAT Study Investigators. The Hydrogel Endovascular Aneurysm Treatment Trial (HEAT): A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Second-Generation Hydrogel Coil. Neurosurgery. 2020 May 1;86(5):615-624. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa006.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32078692 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HEAT_protocol1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.